Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is the version of 7900 GS video card for notebooks, which is optimized for CAD and professional 3D-applications. Technically, it has the same or similar chip (G71 architecture), but with other Bios and support for professional drivers.

The gaming performance is clearly worse than the 7900 GS (because of the application optimizing). Nonetheless, the most modded drivers can be used, so the Quadro FX 1500M is more a 7900 GS (for the operating system).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

► remove from comparison

This is a highend workstation graphic chip (for CAD and 3D programs optimized) with DirectX 10 and good OpenGL support - probably based on the GeForce 8700M GT graphic card. It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, earthscientists and other professional 3D applications. Certified drivers grant thecorrect and faster (compared to 8700M) representation of professional programs (CAD, CCD, visualisation software).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M is a professional middle class graphics card for mobile workstations (about 15"). It is based on the GeForce GT 330M graphics card with slower clock rates and therefore is a DirectX 10.1 chip that is produced in 40nm. 

Due to a special BIOS and professional drivers, the FX 880M should perform noticeably better than a 330M in professional applications (like CAD, DCC, Rendering). Another advantage for professional users are the certified drivers that should ensure a bug free experience with the most common professional applications. Futhermore, the Quadro FX drivers contain profiles for these applications to ensure the best settings (similar to the game profiles in GeForce cards).

The Quadro FX 880M is also based on the GT216 core in 40nm. The shaders are based on the desktop GTX 200 architecture and therefore a bit improved compared to the previous generation cards.

Without load, the Quadro FX 880M is able to downclock to 135 / 270 / 135 MHz (chip / shader / memory clock).

The gaming performance of the FX 880M should be beyond the GT 330M, because of the different drivers. Gamers should choose a GeForce card because of the better game support.

The chip supports Optimus for automatic switching between dedicated and integrated graphics card (e.g. in the new Core i5 CPUs). Still Optimus was for example not integrated in the Lenovo Thinkpad W510.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1600MNVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG71GLMNB8P-GLMN10P-GLM
ArchitectureG7xG8xGT2xx
Pipelines20 / 7 Pixel- / Vertexshader32 - unified48 - unified
Core Speed375 MHz625 MHz550 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz800 MHz790 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3GDDR3, DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB512 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Power Consumption20 Watt50 Watt35 Watt
Transistors278 Million289 Million
technology90 nm80 nm40 nm
Features90nmPureVideo, video scaling, LCDs with 1920x1200 pixel, PCI-Express, connection for ext. graphic card
Notebook Sizelargelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement18.04.2006 01.06.2007 07.01.2010
InformationPCI-E, 90nmCG shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit precision of the graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PCI-E inferface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full screen antialiasing
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/page/nb_chipset.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Shader Speed1250 MHz1210 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 2558     avg: 2643     median: 2638.5 (2%)     max: 2735 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2128     avg: 2203     median: 2149.5 (2%)     max: 2385 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
26279 Points (27%)
min: 27822     avg: 32843     median: 35198 (37%)     max: 35509 Points
min: 28169     avg: 32291     median: 33331 (35%)     max: 34331 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 14650     avg: 15283     median: 15283 (8%)     max: 15916 Points
min: 15060     avg: 16009     median: 15915 (8%)     max: 17144 Points
min: 18796     avg: 18980     median: 19002 (10%)     max: 19137 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6386     avg: 6666     median: 6400 (9%)     max: 7212 Points
min: 9344     avg: 9963     median: 9873 (14%)     max: 10375 Points
min: 13154     avg: 13217     median: 13185 (18%)     max: 13298 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
min: 3900     avg: 3903     median: 3903 (6%)     max: 3906 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
min: 4535     avg: 4623     median: 4622.5 (7%)     max: 4710 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
4074 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
min: 4798     avg: 4916     median: 4915.5 (7%)     max: 5033 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 6366     avg: 6401     median: 6378 (10%)     max: 6473 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
3DMark 06
5608 Points (8%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
3DMark 06
6392 Points (10%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
47.8 Points (99%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
47.6 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
60.1 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
58 Points (86%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
24.4 Points (63%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 9.18     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (7%)     max: 10.27 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 11.04     avg: 11.2     median: 11.2 (19%)     max: 11.32 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 7.56     avg: 16     median: 16 (19%)     max: 24.45 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 4.28     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (22%)     max: 6.21 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.94     avg: 8     median: 8 (6%)     max: 9.09 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 9.81     avg: 23.8     median: 23.8 (26%)     max: 37.84 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 10     avg: 10.3     median: 10.3 (5%)     max: 10.59 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 8.63     avg: 12.3     median: 12.3 (15%)     max: 15.92 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3899     avg: 4670     median: 4885 (21%)     max: 5226 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
min: 4809     avg: 4886     median: 4846 (21%)     max: 5002 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 15.84     avg: 16     median: 16 (6%)     max: 16.14 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 128% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 153% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
129.2  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 880M:
90.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 880M:
50.4  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
155  fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro FX 880M:
42  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 880M:
29  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 880M:
12  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
58.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro FX 880M:
30.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 880M:
16.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 880M:
9.7  fps
low 800x600
Quadro FX 880M:
124.1  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
42.2  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 880M:
35.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 880M:
21  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 880M:
75.4  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
29.8 33.4 ~ 32 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 880M:
18.2 20.6 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 880M:
12.7  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 880M:
79.3  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
45.7 47.8 ~ 47 fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 880M:
20 39 ~ 30 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 880M:
12.8  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
59.7 60 131 147.3 ~ 100 fps
ultra 1280x1024
Quadro FX 880M:
19 19.1 20.5 23 ~ 20 fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 880M:
179.6  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
65.9  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 880M:
42.3  fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
Quadro FX 880M:
93.3  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
32.4  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
48.7  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 880M:
28.9  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
Quadro FX 880M:
225.7  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
60  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 880M:
59.9  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
29.9  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 880M:
28.2  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
83.2 84.2 ~ 84 fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
31.5 33.3 ~ 32 fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.6 14.4 15.9 ~ 15 fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
12.7 72.2 73.1 ~ 53 fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
23.5 29.6 ~ 27 fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.2 15.6 ~ 14 fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
36 37 ~ 37 fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
21 23 ~ 22 fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
259  fps
182%
Quadro FX 1600M:
444 476 493 ~ 471 fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
143  fps
113%
Quadro FX 1600M:
153 162 167 ~ 161 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
63  fps
90%
Quadro FX 1600M:
56 56 59 ~ 57 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
114.5  fps
146%
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.8 173.6 ~ 167 fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.6  fps
149%
Quadro FX 1600M:
164.3 174 ~ 169 fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.9  fps
143%
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.6 165 ~ 163 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
109.3  fps
118%
Quadro FX 1600M:
129.1 129.2 ~ 129 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
380.7  fps
144%
Quadro FX 1600M:
549  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 136%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 90%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.17
log 27. 05:23:23

#0 checking url part for id 7 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 183 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1621 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.052s ... 0.053s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.054s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.054s

#40 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.054s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 7 +0.042s ... 0.096s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#43 got single benchmarks 7 +0.006s ... 0.103s

#44 getting avg benchmarks for device 183 +0s ... 0.103s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.104s

#46 got single benchmarks 183 +0.006s ... 0.11s

#47 getting avg benchmarks for device 1621 +0s ... 0.11s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.111s

#49 got single benchmarks 1621 +0.01s ... 0.121s

#50 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.121s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.122s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#133 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.133s

#134 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.133s

#135 Got 91 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.14s

#136 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.14s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.14s

#148 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.141s

#149 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.142s

#150 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.142s

#151 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.142s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.143s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.143s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.144s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.144s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.144s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.144s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.145s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.145s

#166 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.145s

#168 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#169 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.145s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.145s

#173 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.146s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#179 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#183 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.147s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.147s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.148s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.149s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.149s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.15s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#201 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.151s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#208 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.151s

#211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.152s

#215 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#221 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#224 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#225 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#226 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.153s

#227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#229 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#238 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.154s

#239 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.154s

#240 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.154s

#241 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.154s

#242 return log +0s ... 0.154s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)