NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro 5010M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (GF100 chip). Therefore, the 5010M is closely related to the consumer GeForce GTX 480M . The Quadro 5010M is the successor to the Quadro 5000M and also offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards with similar specifications.
The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi architecture, the 5010M should offer higher levels of performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.
Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 5010M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called 3D Vision Pro .
To automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro, the 5010M supports Nvidia Optimus . Note, however, that whether this feature is integrated or not depends on the notebook manufacturer.
Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5010M is specified at 100 Watt TDP . As a result, only very large laptops, such as the Clevo D901F , are able to house this high-end card.
At the time of arrival (Feb. 2011), the Quadro 5010M succeeds the older Quadrio FX 5000M as the fastest professional workstation graphic card for laptops.
NVIDIA Quadro M620 ► remove from comparison
The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M620 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M , for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The older Quadro M1000M offers very similar specs (same amount of shader cores and also based on the same chip but more graphics memory), but was intended for the Skylake generation. The M620 is intended for the Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
Due to the smaller amount of memory, the Quadro M620 should be slightly slower than the older Quadro M1000M. However, the exact clock speeds are not known up to now. In early benchmarks we have, the M1000M is about 9 % faster than the M620 in SPECviewperf 12.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M620 can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M620 is rated for a 30 Watt TGP including the board and memory components (21.2 Watt TDP), which is 10 Watt lower than the M1000M (which offers more memory). Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably GF104 like the GeForce GTX 470M). Compared to the 5010M, the 3000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.
The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 3000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations .
Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.
To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 3000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).
As the GeForce GTX 470M, the Quadro 3000M is specified at 75 Watt TDP and therefore only suited for large laptops with 17 inch displays.
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M NVIDIA Quadro M620 NVIDIA Quadro 3000M Quadro M Series Codename N12E-Q5 Fermi Architecture Fermi Maxwell Fermi Pipelines 384 - unified 512 - unified 240 - unified Core Speed 450 MHz 1018 MHz 450 MHz Shader Speed 900 MHz 900 MHz Memory Speed 1300 MHz 5012 MHz 625 MHz Memory Bus Width 256 Bit 128 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 ECC GDDR5 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 2048 MB 2048 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 Power Consumption 100 Watt 30 Watt 75 Watt Transistors 3 Billion technology 40 nm 28 nm 40 nm Features OpenGl 4.1, ECC Memory, FP64 IEEE 754 Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus OpenGl 4.1, FP32 Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 22.02.2011 13.01.2017 22.02.2011 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.de
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M620
1.4 pt (4%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
968 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
862 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11481 avg: 13620 median: 13620 (15%) max: 15759 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 20980 avg: 22120 median: 22119.5 (6%) max: 23259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2694 avg: 2914 median: 2989 (5%) max: 3059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2867 avg: 3067 median: 3130 (4%) max: 3204 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
163099 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3032 avg: 3066 median: 3066 (4%) max: 3100 Points
min: 4015 avg: 4118 median: 4140 (6%) max: 4200 Points
1742 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2693 Points (2%)
min: 3676 avg: 3761 median: 3801 (3%) max: 3805 Points
1539 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12991 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M620
17237 Points (5%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
7941 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
11047 Points (6%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M620
15307 Points (9%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 6604 avg: 6661 median: 6660.5 (4%) max: 6717 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
52873 Points (28%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
24769 Points (27%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 18617 avg: 19544 median: 19036 (25%) max: 20979 Points
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 SCHENKER XIRIOS W710 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024)X5670 Quadro 5010M 450 / 1300 MHz 4 GB 24 GB 18617 Eurocom Panther 3.0 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 990X EE Quadro 5010M 4 GB 12 GB 19036 Schenker X7200 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 990X EE Quadro 5010M 12 GB 20979
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
24751 Points (33%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 14054 avg: 14221 median: 14220.5 (19%) max: 14387 Points
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 2630QM Quadro 3000M 2 GB 4 GB 14054 Dell Precision M6600 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 2720QM Quadro 3000M 8 GB 14387
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 15.6 avg: 16.5 median: 16.5 (5%) max: 17.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
41.7 fps (8%)
56.6 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 34.9 avg: 38.2 median: 38.2 (23%) max: 41.4 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
37.9 fps (23%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
20.4 fps (12%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 37.6 avg: 39.8 median: 39.8 (23%) max: 41.9 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
40.4 fps (23%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
22.9 fps (13%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 37.93 avg: 46.1 median: 46.1 (35%) max: 54.2 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
50.1 fps (38%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
30.1 fps (23%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 7.99 avg: 8.8 median: 8.8 (10%) max: 9.7 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
20.2 fps (24%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
7.6 fps (9%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 53.6 avg: 72.4 median: 72.4 (55%) max: 91.1 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
55.4 fps (42%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 40.01 avg: 47.5 median: 47.5 (51%) max: 54.9 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
54.8 fps (59%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 36.73 avg: 37.9 median: 37.9 (18%) max: 39.1 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
32.6 fps (16%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 33.89 avg: 38.2 median: 38.1 (20%) max: 42.4 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
51.5 fps (27%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
24.6 fps (13%)
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 55.3 avg: 57.6 median: 56.3 (14%) max: 62.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 25.96 avg: 27.5 median: 27.8 (4%) max: 28.2 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 15.8 avg: 18.8 median: 20.2 (4%) max: 20.3 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 10.34 avg: 11 median: 10.9 (3%) max: 11.6 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 22.94 avg: 24.9 median: 25.2 (7%) max: 26.5 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.22 avg: 0.5 median: 0.6 (1%) max: 0.67 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 33.8 avg: 34.5 median: 34.4 (14%) max: 35.26 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 29.42 avg: 31.7 median: 32.1 (5%) max: 33.32 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 17.3 avg: 24.9 median: 24.9 (4%) max: 32.47 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
59.6 fps (16%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
46.8 fps (5%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
16.2 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
5.2 fps (1%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
39.7 fps (5%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
0.6 fps (0%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
35.6 fps (5%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
40.7 fps (5%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
16.6 fps (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6620 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
6851 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
6519 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 65.1 avg: 67.5 median: 67.5 (23%) max: 69.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
72.4 fps (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 45.4 avg: 45.5 median: 45.5 (16%) max: 45.65 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 82.7 avg: 95.3 median: 95.3 (6%) max: 107.8 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
65.2 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
97.8 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
133.5 fps (8%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232.3 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 482 avg: 658 median: 658 (3%) max: 834 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 718 avg: 1079 median: 1079 (2%) max: 1440 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2530 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
58.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 100% n=15 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 123% n=15 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 66% n=15
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro M620:
127.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
44.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
31.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
15.7 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
59.2 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
60.4 ~ 60 fps
Quadro M620:
25.2 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
46.3 ~ 36 fps
Quadro M620:
18.7 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
25.2 ~ 22 fps
Quadro M620:
13.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
19.5 ~ 17 fps
Quadro M620:
55.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
62.2 ~ 59 fps
Quadro M620:
31.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
36.6 ~ 34 fps
Quadro M620:
17.8 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
20.4 ~ 19 fps
Quadro M620:
14.4 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
4.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
105.4 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
35.3 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
81.6 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
28.2 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
105 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
72.8 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
268.6 fps
77%
Quadro 3000M:
206.2 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
162.3 fps
78%
Quadro 3000M:
127.3 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
86.6 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
51.9 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
98.4 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
52.7 fps
Quadro 3000M:
53.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
37.9 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
14.6 fps
79%
Quadro 3000M:
11.5 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
88.9 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
45.3 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
93.4 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
62.5 fps
Quadro 3000M:
66.7 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
64.3 fps
62%
Quadro 3000M:
39.6 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
41.9 fps
73%
Quadro 3000M:
30.4 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
120.6 fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
73.3 fps
Quadro 3000M:
104.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
100%
Quadro 5010M:
108.5 fps
65%
Quadro 3000M:
70.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
65%
Quadro 3000M:
43.3 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
113.5 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
71.4 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
40 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
187.6 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
52.4 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 71% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 66%
NVIDIA Quadro M620 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rocket League 127.1 44.9 31.9 15.7 Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III 70.3 18.7 Doom 60 36 22 17 Rise of the Tomb Raider 59 34 19 14.4 4.9 Star Wars Battlefront 110.6 64.3 28.92 24.37 The Witcher 3 53.9 32.83 18.62 10 Dirt Rally 249 118.5 62 28.2 Total War: Rome II 190.5 139.6 114.4 17.8 Company of Heroes 2 51.7 44.4 27.1 11.7 GRID 2 192.8 147.4 126 39.1 BioShock Infinite 176.4 105.6 92.3 35.6 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 3 5 1 5 3 2 5 1 3 1 7 2 2
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Dirt 3 105.4 35.3 Crysis 2 81.6 28.2 Call of Duty: Black Ops 105 72.8 Fifa 11 268.6 162.3 Mafia 2 86.6 51.9 StarCraft 2 98.4 52.7 Metro 2033 37.9 14.6 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 88.9 45.3 CoD Modern Warfare 2 93.4 62.5 Risen 64.3 41.9 Resident Evil 5 120.6 73.3 Need for Speed Shift 108.5 67 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 9 2 2 5 4 1
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fifa 11 206.2 127.3 Metro 2033 53.8 11.5 Risen 66.7 39.6 30.4 Need for Speed Shift 104.8 70.9 43.3 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 113.5 71.4 40 Anno 1404 187.6 52.4 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 4 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 19. 18:00:57
#0 checking url part for id 2429 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 7708 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.183s ... 0.185s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.185s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.185s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2429 +0.046s ... 0.231s
#9 got single benchmarks 2429 +0.012s ... 0.242s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7708 +0.024s ... 0.267s
#11 got single benchmarks 7708 +0.022s ... 0.289s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.002s ... 0.291s
#13 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.01s ... 0.301s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.301s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.481s ... 0.782s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.782s
#17 Got 89 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.796s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.796s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.02s ... 0.815s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.062s ... 0.878s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.878s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.88s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)