NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5010M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (GF100 chip). Therefore, the 5010M is closely related to the  consumer GeForce GTX 480M. The Quadro 5010M is the successor to the Quadro 5000M and also offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards with similar specifications.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi architecture, the 5010M should offer higher levels of performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 5010M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro, the 5010M supports Nvidia Optimus. Note, however, that whether this feature is integrated or not depends on the notebook manufacturer.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5010M is specified at 100 Watt TDP. As a result, only very large laptops, such as the Clevo D901F, are able to house this high-end card.

At the time of arrival (Feb. 2011), the Quadro 5010M succeeds the older Quadrio FX 5000M as the fastest professional workstation graphic card for laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M2200

The Nvidia Quadro M2200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built most likely on the GM206 chip with 1024 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (second generation). The Quadro M2200M is built for the Intel Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The maximum core clock of the Quadro M2200 is 1038 MHz. The performance is between the old Quadro M2000M and Quadro M3000M, but generally closer to the latter (sometimes even on par). It is not surprising that the gaming performance is comparable to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (Ti) and it is just behind the new GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2200 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M2200 is rated at a TGP of 55 Watt (39.1 Watt TDP) – similar to the previous Quadro M2000M – and therefore best suited for 15-inch laptops and up.

NVIDIA Quadro 5010MNVIDIA Quadro M2200
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 (compare) 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M (compare) 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M (compare) 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M (compare) 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 (compare) 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M (compare) 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M (compare) 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 (compare) 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M (compare) 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 (compare) 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M (compare) 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M (compare) 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M (compare) 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M (compare) 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M (compare) 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M (compare) 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 (compare) 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M (compare) 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M (compare) 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M (compare) 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 (compare) 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M (compare) 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M (compare) 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 (compare) 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M (compare) 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 (compare) 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M (compare) 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M (compare) 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M (compare) 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M (compare) 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M (compare) 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M (compare) 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN12E-Q5N17P-Q3
ArchitectureFermiMaxwell
384 - 1024 -
Core450 MHz694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz
Shader900 MHz
Memory1300 MHz5508 MHz
Bus256 Bit128 Bit
MemoryGDDR5 ECCGDDR5
Max. Memory4096 MB4096 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 11, 5.0DirectX 12_1, 5.0
Transistors3000 Million4940 Million
Technology40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, ECC Memory, FP64 IEEE 754Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Size
Introduced22.02.2011 13.01.2017
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-mobi...http://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (13%)     max: 1920 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (12%)     max: 1750 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (54%)     max: 298148 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (31%)     max: 22003 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (19%)     max: 37841 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (18%)     max: 5275 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (14%)     max: 5869 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (26%)     max: 263022 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 3032     avg: 3066     median: 3066 (8%)     max: 3100 points
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (20%)     max: 7709 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
2693 points (5%)
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (14%)     max: 7425 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
52873 Points (28%)
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
24769 Points (47%)
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (17%)     max: 28.1 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
41.7 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
7.5 points (95%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
7.5 points (95%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Ref. Match 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
219 fps (35%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
59.9 fps (16%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
111 fps (25%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
60 fps (23%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (25%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (19%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
4332 Points (15%)
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
68.5 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
89.2 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 120%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
Quadro M2200:
»
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
Quadro M2200:
»
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
Quadro M2200:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
Quadro M2200:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
Quadro M2200:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
Quadro M2200:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
18 fps 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
Quadro M2200:
»
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
Quadro M2200:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
Quadro M2200:
»
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
Quadro M2200:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps
Quadro M2200:
»
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
105.4 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
35.3 fps  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
81.6 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
28.2 fps  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
105  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
72.8  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
268.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
162.3  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
86.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
51.9  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
98.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
52.7  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
high 1600x900
100%
Quadro 5010M:
37.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
14.6  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
88.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
45.3  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
93.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
62.5  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Risen

Risen

2009
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
64.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
41.9  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
120.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
73.3  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
108.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
67  fps
Quadro 5010M:
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 100%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.11
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)