Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5010M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (GF100 chip). Therefore, the 5010M is closely related to the  consumer GeForce GTX 480M. The Quadro 5010M is the successor to the Quadro 5000M and also offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards with similar specifications.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi architecture, the 5010M should offer higher levels of performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 5010M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro, the 5010M supports Nvidia Optimus. Note, however, that whether this feature is integrated or not depends on the notebook manufacturer.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5010M is specified at 100 Watt TDP. As a result, only very large laptops, such as the Clevo D901F, are able to house this high-end card.

At the time of arrival (Feb. 2011), the Quadro 5010M succeeds the older Quadrio FX 5000M as the fastest professional workstation graphic card for laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200

The Nvidia Quadro M2200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built most likely on the GM206 chip with 1024 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (second generation). The Quadro M2200M is built for the Intel Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The maximum core clock of the Quadro M2200 is 1038 MHz. The performance is between the old Quadro M2000M and Quadro M3000M, but generally closer to the latter (sometimes even on par). It is not surprising that the gaming performance is comparable to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (Ti) and it is just behind the new GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2200 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M2200 is rated at a TGP of 55 Watt (39.1 Watt TDP) – similar to the previous Quadro M2000M – and therefore best suited for 15-inch laptops and up.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro 5010MNVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN12E-Q5N17P-Q3
ArchitectureFermiMaxwell
Pipelines384 - unified1024 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed900 MHz
Memory Speed1300 MHz5508 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5 ECCGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption100 Watt55 Watt
Transistors3 Billion4.9 Billion
technology40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, ECC Memory, FP64 IEEE 754Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.7 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -98%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
2.18 -18%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M
2.3 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2.31 -13%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
2.33 -12%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2.34 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
2.39 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
2.41 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
2.52 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
2.57 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
2.66
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
2.71 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
2.76 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
2.78 5%
AMD Radeon 760M
2.8 5%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.88 8%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.88 8%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.98 12%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
3 13%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
3.07 15%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
21.1 693%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 1152%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (5%)     max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (33%)     max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (22%)     max: 22003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (10%)     max: 37841 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (9%)     max: 5275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (7%)     max: 5869 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (23%)     max: 263022 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3032     avg: 3066     median: 3066 (4%)     max: 3100 Points
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (11%)     max: 7709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2693 Points (2%)
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (6%)     max: 7425 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12991 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
11047 Points (6%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
24915 Points (14%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
52873 Points (28%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
24769 Points (27%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
3DMark 06
min: 18617     avg: 19544     median: 19036 (25%)     max: 20979 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 26834     avg: 28150     median: 28149.5 (37%)     max: 29465 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (9%)     max: 28.1 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
41.7 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 34.9     avg: 38.2     median: 38.2 (23%)     max: 41.4 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.26     avg: 48.9     median: 48.9 (29%)     max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 37.6     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (23%)     max: 41.9 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 49.11     avg: 51     median: 51 (29%)     max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 37.93     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (35%)     max: 54.2 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 42.66     avg: 49.7     median: 49.7 (38%)     max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 7.99     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (10%)     max: 9.7 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 16.23     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (23%)     max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 53.6     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (55%)     max: 91.1 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 56.6     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (43%)     max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 40.01     avg: 47.5     median: 47.5 (51%)     max: 54.9 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 47.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (57%)     max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 36.73     avg: 37.9     median: 37.9 (18%)     max: 39.1 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 55.7     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (27%)     max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 33.89     avg: 38.2     median: 38.1 (20%)     max: 42.4 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.49     avg: 50.6     median: 50.6 (27%)     max: 52.7 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 85.3     avg: 90.3     median: 86.2 (21%)     max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 57.7     avg: 58.3     median: 58.1 (9%)     max: 59 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 31.14     avg: 32.2     median: 32.8 (7%)     max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 20.34     avg: 23.6     median: 24.6 (6%)     max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 46.93     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (13%)     max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.28     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (5%)     max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 68.2     avg: 69.3     median: 68.5 (27%)     max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71.4     avg: 72.2     median: 72 (12%)     max: 73.2 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6620 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 65.1     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (23%)     max: 69.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
88.6 fps (31%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.9     avg: 107.4     median: 103.9 (6%)     max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
110.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
163.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219.1 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (6%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (4%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.5 dB(A) (63%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 158% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Ghost Recon Wildlands

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
Rainbow Six Siege

Rainbow Six Siege

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
Star Wars Battlefront

Star Wars Battlefront

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
18 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
Battlefield 4

Battlefield 4

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
BioShock Infinite

BioShock Infinite

2013
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
105.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
35.3  fps
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
81.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
28.2  fps
Call of Duty: Black Ops

Call of Duty: Black Ops

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
105  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
72.8  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
268.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
162.3  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
86.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
51.9  fps
StarCraft 2

StarCraft 2

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
98.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
52.7  fps
Metro 2033

Metro 2033

2010
high 1600x900
100%
Quadro 5010M:
37.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
14.6  fps
Battlefield: Bad Company 2

Battlefield: Bad Company 2

2010
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
88.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
45.3  fps
CoD Modern Warfare 2

CoD Modern Warfare 2

2009
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
93.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
62.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
64.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
41.9  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
120.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
73.3  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 5010M:
108.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 5010M:
67  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro M2200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ghost Recon Wildlands83.437.133.717.6
For Honor7854513714.6
Battlefield 1139.4105.347.142
Rise of the Tomb Raider12671403413.7
Rainbow Six Siege214.2131.270.452.4
Star Wars Battlefront148.811956.448.2
The Witcher 311166351912.7
Thief108.888.674.839.6
Battlefield 4171.5148.3115.947.8
BioShock Infinite25017615258
Tomb Raider381.4238.8149.370.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4
7
2
5
4
6
3
2		2
8
1



3


NVIDIA Quadro 5010Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt 3105.435.3
Crysis 281.628.2
Call of Duty: Black Ops10572.8
Fifa 11268.6162.3
Mafia 286.651.9
StarCraft 298.452.7
Metro 203337.914.6
Battlefield: Bad Company 288.945.3
CoD Modern Warfare 293.462.5
Risen64.341.9
Resident Evil 5120.673.3
Need for Speed Shift108.567
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1
9
2		2
5
4
1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 09:25:43

#0 checking url part for id 2429 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.122s ... 0.123s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.123s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.123s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2429 +0.027s ... 0.15s

#8 got single benchmarks 2429 +0.01s ... 0.16s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.022s ... 0.183s

#10 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.024s ... 0.207s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.207s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.284s ... 0.492s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.492s

#14 Got 92 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.505s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.505s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.018s ... 0.523s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.053s ... 0.576s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.576s

#19 return log +0.047s ... 0.623s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)