NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro 5000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture. Therefore, the 5000M likely shares many similarities to the GeForce GTX 480M which offers more CUDA cores. The Quadro is the first mobile GPU that offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.
The Quadro series also offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
The shader/CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 5000M should offer higher performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.
Furthermore, the Quadro 5000M is compatible with Nvidia 3D Vision Pro for stereoscopic viewing.
Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5000M is specified at 100 Watt TDP and is therefore usually reserved for large laptops with ample cooling, such as the Clevo D901F .
At the time of arrival (mid 2010), the Quadro 5000M was the fastest professional workstation graphics card for laptops and is the successor to the old G92b-based GeForce FX 3800M . Compared to desktop Quadro cards, the mobile Quadro 5000M offers less shader cores and likely a lower core clock rate as well.
NVIDIA Quadro M620 ► remove from comparison
The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M620 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M , for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The older Quadro M1000M offers very similar specs (same amount of shader cores and also based on the same chip but more graphics memory), but was intended for the Skylake generation. The M620 is intended for the Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
Due to the smaller amount of memory, the Quadro M620 should be slightly slower than the older Quadro M1000M. However, the exact clock speeds are not known up to now. In early benchmarks we have, the M1000M is about 9 % faster than the M620 in SPECviewperf 12.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M620 can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M620 is rated for a 30 Watt TGP including the board and memory components (21.2 Watt TDP), which is 10 Watt lower than the M1000M (which offers more memory). Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M3000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with 1024 of the 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M . The Quadro M3000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K3100M (Kepler-based). The M3000M usually comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 102.4 GB/s of the K5100M).
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
As the exact clock speed of the M3000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is the mid-range model of the mobile Quadro line in 2015 and based on the same chip as the GeForce GTX 965M. Therefore, it should be clearly faster than the old Quadro K3100M.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M3000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M3000M is rated at the same TGP of 75 Watt as the K3100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater and 25 Watt less than the M4000M and M5000M.
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M NVIDIA Quadro M620 NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Quadro M Series Codename Fermi Architecture Fermi Maxwell Maxwell Pipelines 320 - unified 512 - unified 1024 - unified Core Speed 405 MHz 1018 MHz 1050 MHz Shader Speed 810 MHz Memory Speed 1200 MHz 5012 MHz 5000 MHz Memory Bus Width 256 Bit 128 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB 4 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 100 Watt 30 Watt 75 Watt Transistors 3 Billion 5.2 Billion technology 40 nm 28 nm 28 nm Features OpenGL 4.1, DirectX 11, DirectCompute, OpenCL, CUDA, AXE, Error-Correction-Codes (ECC)-Memory, IEEE-Double-Precision-Floating-Point, PowerMizer 9.0 Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 27.07.2010 13.01.2017 02.10.2015 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M620
1.4 pt (4%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M3000M
3 pt (9%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
968 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
862 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11481 avg: 13620 median: 13620 (15%) max: 15759 Points
min: 19732 avg: 21408 median: 21407.5 (23%) max: 23083 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 20980 avg: 22120 median: 22119.5 (6%) max: 23259 Points
min: 38539 avg: 44603 median: 44602.5 (12%) max: 50666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2694 avg: 2914 median: 2989 (5%) max: 3059 Points
min: 5835 avg: 5972 median: 5971.5 (11%) max: 6108 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2867 avg: 3067 median: 3130 (4%) max: 3204 Points
min: 6415 avg: 6537 median: 6536.5 (7%) max: 6658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
163099 Points (20%)
min: 42957 avg: 84310 median: 84309.5 (10%) max: 125662 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4015 avg: 4118 median: 4140 (6%) max: 4200 Points
min: 8493 avg: 8540 median: 8539.5 (12%) max: 8586 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3676 avg: 3761 median: 3801 (3%) max: 3805 Points
min: 8264 avg: 8289 median: 8288.5 (7%) max: 8313 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 7700 avg: 7767 median: 7766.5 (2%) max: 7833 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M620
17237 Points (5%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
27405 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
7015 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M620
15307 Points (9%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
27921 Points (16%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
41650 Points (22%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value HP EliteBook 8740w 820QM Quadro 5000M 405/810 / 1200 MHz 2 GB 16 GB 41650
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
18903 Points (21%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value HP EliteBook 8740w 820QM Quadro 5000M 405/810 / 1200 MHz 2 GB 16 GB 18903
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
12967 Points (17%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 HP Elitebook 8740w (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 740QM Quadro 5000M 16 GB 12967
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
24751 Points (33%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 26746 avg: 27321 median: 27320.5 (36%) max: 27895 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
13127 Points (17%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 HP EliteBook 8740w (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768) 820QM Quadro 5000M 405/810 / 1200 MHz 2 GB 16 GB 13127
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 15.6 avg: 16.5 median: 16.5 (5%) max: 17.4 fps
min: 37.8 avg: 38.2 median: 38.2 (13%) max: 38.5 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 79.3 avg: 80 median: 80 (26%) max: 80.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 43.4 avg: 59.8 median: 59.8 (27%) max: 76.2 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
56.6 fps (11%)
min: 112.7 avg: 114.5 median: 114.5 (22%) max: 116.2 fps
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 28.13 avg: 28.6 median: 28.6 (17%) max: 29 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
37.9 fps (23%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 49.91 avg: 55.8 median: 50 (30%) max: 67.4 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 25.96 avg: 26.4 median: 26.4 (15%) max: 26.82 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
40.4 fps (23%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 41.16 avg: 50.2 median: 53 (30%) max: 56.3 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 29.99 avg: 30.1 median: 30.1 (23%) max: 30.2 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
50.1 fps (38%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 35.28 avg: 45.1 median: 48 (37%) max: 52 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 6.4 avg: 6.6 median: 6.6 (8%) max: 6.71 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
20.2 fps (24%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 16.08 avg: 19.5 median: 20 (24%) max: 22.46 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 43.9 avg: 44.6 median: 44.6 (34%) max: 45.2 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
55.4 fps (42%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 57 avg: 66.9 median: 57.8 (44%) max: 86 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 31.9 avg: 33.3 median: 33.3 (36%) max: 34.7 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
54.8 fps (59%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 35.34 avg: 47.4 median: 51.9 (56%) max: 55 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 28.6 avg: 29 median: 29 (14%) max: 29.3 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
32.6 fps (16%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 59 avg: 59.2 median: 59.1 (28%) max: 59.5 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 25.1 avg: 26.9 median: 26.9 (14%) max: 28.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
51.5 fps (27%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 43.12 avg: 49.5 median: 52 (27%) max: 53.4 fps
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 55.3 avg: 57.6 median: 56.3 (14%) max: 62.5 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 52.3 avg: 76.4 median: 84.8 (21%) max: 92 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 25.96 avg: 27.5 median: 27.8 (4%) max: 28.2 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 39.84 avg: 52.5 median: 52 (8%) max: 65.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 15.8 avg: 18.8 median: 20.2 (4%) max: 20.3 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 37 avg: 40.2 median: 39.8 (9%) max: 43.81 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 10.34 avg: 11 median: 10.9 (3%) max: 11.6 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 17.46 avg: 20.6 median: 22 (6%) max: 22.34 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 22.94 avg: 24.9 median: 25.2 (7%) max: 26.5 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 23.08 avg: 44.8 median: 50.4 (14%) max: 61 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.22 avg: 0.5 median: 0.6 (1%) max: 0.67 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 4.68 avg: 4.8 median: 4.8 (4%) max: 4.85 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 33.8 avg: 34.5 median: 34.4 (14%) max: 35.26 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 42.17 avg: 57.7 median: 64.8 (26%) max: 66 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 29.42 avg: 31.7 median: 32.1 (5%) max: 33.32 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 45.24 avg: 66.7 median: 77 (13%) max: 77.9 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 17.3 avg: 24.9 median: 24.9 (4%) max: 32.47 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
59.6 fps (16%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
46.8 fps (5%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
16.2 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
5.2 fps (1%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
39.7 fps (5%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
0.6 fps (0%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
35.6 fps (5%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
40.7 fps (5%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
16.6 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M620 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6851 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 4455 avg: 5650 median: 5649.5 (4%) max: 6844 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
32.7 fps (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
72.4 fps (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 42.4 avg: 71.1 median: 71.1 (25%) max: 99.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 82.7 avg: 95.3 median: 95.3 (6%) max: 107.8 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 68 avg: 92.1 median: 92.1 (5%) max: 116.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
65.2 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
97.8 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
133.5 fps (8%)
249.9 fps (15%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232.3 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 482 avg: 658 median: 658 (3%) max: 834 Samples/s
min: 1258 avg: 1273 median: 1273 (6%) max: 1288 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 718 avg: 1079 median: 1079 (2%) max: 1440 Samples/s
min: 2234 avg: 2261 median: 2261 (4%) max: 2288 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2530 Points (3%)
4737 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
58.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5000M → 100% n=12 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 184% n=12 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M3000M → 225% n=12
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro M620:
127.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
44.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
31.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
15.7 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
59.2 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
60.4 ~ 60 fps
Quadro M620:
25.2 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
46.3 ~ 36 fps
Quadro M620:
18.7 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
25.2 ~ 22 fps
Quadro M620:
13.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
19.5 ~ 17 fps
Quadro M620:
55.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
62.2 ~ 59 fps
Quadro M620:
31.1 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
36.6 ~ 34 fps
Quadro M620:
17.8 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
20.4 ~ 19 fps
Quadro M620:
14.4 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M620:
4.9 [X] HP ZBook x2 G4-2ZC12EA Intel Core i7-8650U 1.9GHz
Quadro M620
fps
Quadro M3000M:
179 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
123 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
58 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
21 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
122 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
120 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
94 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
87 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
69 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
45 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
200 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
125 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
68 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
54 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
380 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
186 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
151 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
81 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
349 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
271 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
217 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
40 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
66 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
66 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
57 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
Quadro M3000M:
25 [X] SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz
Quadro M3000M
fps
NVIDIA Quadro M620 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rocket League 127.1 44.9 31.9 15.7 Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III 70.3 18.7 Doom 60 36 22 17 Rise of the Tomb Raider 59 34 19 14.4 4.9 Star Wars Battlefront 110.6 64.3 28.92 24.37 The Witcher 3 53.9 32.83 18.62 10 Dirt Rally 249 118.5 62 28.2 Total War: Rome II 190.5 139.6 114.4 17.8 Company of Heroes 2 51.7 44.4 27.1 11.7 GRID 2 192.8 147.4 126 39.1 BioShock Infinite 176.4 105.6 92.3 35.6 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 3 5 1 5 3 2 5 1 3 1 7 2 2
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rise of the Tomb Raider 114.9 69.9 40.2 33.4 Rainbow Six Siege 146.8 76.8 54.5 23.8 Just Cause 3 85.6 50.4 43.7 17.8 Star Wars Battlefront 124.5 59.4 50.9 17.8 Anno 2205 179 123 58 21 The Witcher 3 122.7 74 42 22 14.1 Dirt Rally 108.6 89.6 53.6 39.2 GTA V 136.1 69.1 29.7 35.3 F1 2014 122 122 122 120 Ryse: Son of Rome 94 87 69 45 Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 200 125 68 54 GRID: Autosport 380 186 151 81 Thief 88.6 77.4 43.1 Total War: Rome II 349 271 217 40 Company of Heroes 2 66 66 57 25 Metro: Last Light 124.5 82.9 44.6 BioShock Infinite 226.3 179 165 70 Tomb Raider 255.1 185 82.1 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 7 7 11 6 7 5 4 10 3 1 4 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 29. 12:46:18
#0 checking url part for id 1939 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 7708 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 6507 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.102s ... 0.103s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.103s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.103s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1939 +0.03s ... 0.133s
#9 got single benchmarks 1939 +0.007s ... 0.14s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7708 +0.014s ... 0.155s
#11 got single benchmarks 7708 +0.014s ... 0.169s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 6507 +0.014s ... 0.182s
#13 got single benchmarks 6507 +0.01s ... 0.192s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.192s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.323s ... 0.515s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.515s
#17 Got 126 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.526s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.526s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 0.538s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.037s ... 0.575s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.575s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.577s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)