, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

The NVIDIA Quadro 4000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (or more specifically, probably the GF104). Unlike the 5010M, the 4000M does not support ECC memory and dual-precision (DP) floating point calculations.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications such as CAD or DCC. As a result, multiple scientific or business disciplines can make use of the workstation GPU. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than consumer-oriented GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering or DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 4000M should offer higher performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 4000M is compatible with 3D Vision Pro, a new software solution by Nvidia for stereoscopic output.

The 4000M supports Nvidia Optimus in order to automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro for power-saving purposes. Whether or not this feature is supported on a laptop, however, is dependent on the laptop manufacturer.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 4000M is specified at 100 Watt TDP and is therefore only found in large laptops such as the Clevo D901F.

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably GF104 like the GeForce GTX 470M). Compared to the 5010M, the 3000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 3000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 3000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

As the GeForce GTX 470M, the Quadro 3000M is specified at 75 Watt TDP and therefore only suited for large laptops with 17 inch displays.

NVIDIA Quadro M620

► remove from comparison

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M620 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M, for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The older Quadro M1000M offers very similar specs (same amount of shader cores and also based on the same chip but more graphics memory), but was intended for the Skylake generation. The M620 is intended for the Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

Due to the smaller amount of memory, the Quadro M620 should be slightly slower than the older Quadro M1000M. However, the exact clock speeds are not known up to now. In early benchmarks we have, the M1000M is about 9 % faster than the M620 in SPECviewperf 12.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M620 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M620 is rated for a 30 Watt TGP including the board and memory components (21.2 Watt TDP), which is 10 Watt lower than the M1000M (which offers more memory). Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.

NVIDIA Quadro 4000MNVIDIA Quadro 3000MNVIDIA Quadro M620
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermiFermi
ArchitectureFermiFermiMaxwell
Pipelines336 - unified240 - unified512 - unified
Core Speed475 MHz450 MHz1018 MHz
Shader Speed950 MHz900 MHz
Memory Speed1200 MHz625 MHz5012 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB2048 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynonono
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
technology40 nm40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32OpenGl 4.1, FP32Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelargelarge
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 22.02.2011 13.01.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-mobi...http://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M620
15.8 pt (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
968 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
862 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11481     avg: 13620     median: 13620 (18%)     max: 15759 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 20980     avg: 22120     median: 22119.5 (11%)     max: 23259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2694     avg: 2914     median: 2989 (8%)     max: 3059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2867     avg: 3067     median: 3130 (6%)     max: 3204 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
163099 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2229     avg: 2335     median: 2334.5 (6%)     max: 2440 Points
1742 Points (4%)
min: 4015     avg: 4118     median: 4140 (10%)     max: 4200 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2025     avg: 2092     median: 2092 (4%)     max: 2159 Points
1539 Points (3%)
min: 3676     avg: 3761     median: 3801 (6%)     max: 3805 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
10722 Points (10%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
7941 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M620
17237 Points (17%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
9184 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 6604     avg: 6661     median: 6660.5 (6%)     max: 6717 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M620
15307 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
3DMark 06
17727 Points (33%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 14054     avg: 14221     median: 14220.5 (26%)     max: 14387 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
24751 Points (46%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 15.6     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (8%)     max: 17.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
31.4 fps (6%)
56.6 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
26.4 fps (19%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
20.4 fps (15%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
37.9 fps (27%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
29.2 fps (49%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
22.9 fps (38%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
40.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
39.1 fps (47%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
30.1 fps (36%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
50.1 fps (61%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
10.6 fps (44%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
7.6 fps (32%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
20.2 fps (84%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
51.4 fps (39%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
55.4 fps (42%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
42.1 fps (45%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
54.9 fps (59%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
24.9 fps (12%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
32.6 fps (16%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
36.5 fps (44%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
24.6 fps (30%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
51.5 fps (63%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 55.3     avg: 57.6     median: 56.3 (24%)     max: 62.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 25.96     avg: 27.5     median: 27.8 (10%)     max: 28.2 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 15.8     avg: 18.8     median: 20.2 (8%)     max: 20.3 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 10.34     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (10%)     max: 11.6 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 22.94     avg: 24.9     median: 25.2 (11%)     max: 26.5 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.22     avg: 0.5     median: 0.6 (2%)     max: 0.67 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 33.8     avg: 34.5     median: 34.4 (20%)     max: 35.26 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 29.42     avg: 31.7     median: 32.1 (11%)     max: 33.32 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 17.3     avg: 24.9     median: 24.9 (8%)     max: 32.47 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
59.6 fps (27%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
46.8 fps (9%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
16.2 fps (7%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
5.2 fps (3%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
39.7 fps (8%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
0.6 fps (1%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
35.6 fps (10%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
40.7 fps (9%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
16.6 fps (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.1 Points (90%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.1 Points (90%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6638 (31%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
6519 (31%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
6851 (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
46 fps (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 45.4     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (19%)     max: 45.65 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
72.4 fps (31%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 82.74     avg: 95.3     median: 95.3 (27%)     max: 107.84 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232 fps (2%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
60 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
134 fps (15%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
60 fps (16%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
65.2 fps (15%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
58.6 fps (22%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 482     avg: 658     median: 658 (7%)     max: 834 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 718     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (3%)     max: 1440 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2530 (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.8 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
58.8 Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 4000M → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 79% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 146% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
127.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
44.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
31.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M620:
15.7  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
70.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.7  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
59.2 60.4 ~ 60 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
25.2 46.3 ~ 36 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.7 25.2 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
13.9 19.5 ~ 17 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
55.1 62.2 ~ 59 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
31.1 36.6 ~ 34 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
17.8 20.4 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
14.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M620:
4.9  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
110.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
64.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
28.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
24.4  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
53.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
10 fps  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
249  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
118.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
62.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
28.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
190.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
139.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
114.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
17.8  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
51.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
44.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
27.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
11.7  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
192.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
147.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
126  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
39.1  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
176.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
105.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
92.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
35.6  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
Quadro 3000M:
206.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 3000M:
127.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 4000M:
180  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro 4000M:
112  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 4000M:
79  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 4000M:
71  fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro 3000M:
53.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 3000M:
11.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro 3000M:
66.7  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 3000M:
39.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 3000M:
30.4  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro 3000M:
104.8  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 3000M:
70.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 3000M:
43.3  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro 3000M:
113.5  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 3000M:
71.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 3000M:
40  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 4000M:
173  fps
108%
Quadro 3000M:
187.6  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 4000M:
62  fps
85%
Quadro 3000M:
52.4  fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 4000M:
279  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 4000M:
165  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 4000M:
79  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 4000M:
188  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 4000M:
148  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 4000M:
117  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 4000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 96%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 85%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.16
log 17. 02:02:21

#0 checking url part for id 2431 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7708 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:20:49 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2431 +0.035s ... 0.082s

#9 got single benchmarks 2431 +0.007s ... 0.088s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0s ... 0.089s

#11 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.005s ... 0.094s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7708 +0.004s ... 0.098s

#13 got single benchmarks 7708 +0.01s ... 0.108s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.108s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.138s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.138s

#17 Got 77 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.145s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.145s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.147s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.013s ... 0.16s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.16s

#22 return log +0.001s ... 0.161s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)