Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably GF104 like the GeForce GTX 470M). Compared to the 5010M, the 3000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 3000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 3000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

As the GeForce GTX 470M, the Quadro 3000M is specified at 75 Watt TDP and therefore only suited for large laptops with 17 inch displays.

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

The Nvidia Quadro M3000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with 1024 of the 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M. The Quadro M3000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K3100M (Kepler-based). The M3000M usually comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 102.4 GB/s of the K5100M). 

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

As the exact clock speed of the M3000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is the mid-range model of the mobile Quadro line in 2015 and based on the same chip as the GeForce GTX 965M. Therefore, it should be clearly faster than the old Quadro K3100M.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M3000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M3000M is rated at the same TGP of 75 Watt as the K3100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater and 25 Watt less than the M4000M and M5000M.

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 1000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably the same chip like the consumer GeForce GT 540M). Compared to the 5010M, the 1000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations. According to the clock rates, the Quadro 1000M should be positioned between the GT 540M and 550M.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 1000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 1000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 1000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

The Quadro 1000M is specified at 45 Watt TDP and therefore suited for 15.6" laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro 3000MNVIDIA Quadro M3000MNVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermiFermi
ArchitectureFermiMaxwellFermi
Pipelines240 - unified1024 - unified96 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz1050 MHz700 MHz
Shader Speed900 MHz1400 MHz
Memory Speed625 MHz5000 MHz900 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB4 GB2048 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption75 Watt75 Watt45 Watt
technology40 nm28 nm40 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOpenGl 4.1, FP32
Notebook Sizelargelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 02.10.2015 22.02.2011
Transistors5.2 Billion
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M3000M
3 pt (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 19732     avg: 21408     median: 21407.5 (23%)     max: 23083 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38539     avg: 44603     median: 44602.5 (12%)     max: 50666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5835     avg: 5972     median: 5971.5 (11%)     max: 6108 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 6415     avg: 6537     median: 6536.5 (7%)     max: 6658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 42957     avg: 84310     median: 84309.5 (10%)     max: 125662 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1742 Points (2%)
min: 8493     avg: 8540     median: 8539.5 (12%)     max: 8586 Points
1064 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1539 Points (1%)
min: 8264     avg: 8289     median: 8288.5 (7%)     max: 8313 Points
943 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
7941 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
27405 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
4566 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 6604     avg: 6661     median: 6660.5 (4%)     max: 6717 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
27921 Points (16%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3679 Points (2%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
40779 Points (42%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
21603 Points (11%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
16583 Points (18%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark 06
min: 14054     avg: 14221     median: 14220.5 (19%)     max: 14387 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 26746     avg: 27321     median: 27320.5 (36%)     max: 27895 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
min: 7827     avg: 8312     median: 8509 (11%)     max: 8599 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 37.8     avg: 38.2     median: 38.2 (13%)     max: 38.5 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 79.3     avg: 80     median: 80 (26%)     max: 80.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 43.4     avg: 59.8     median: 59.8 (27%)     max: 76.2 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 112.7     avg: 114.5     median: 114.5 (22%)     max: 116.2 fps
10.1 fps (2%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
20.4 fps (12%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 49.91     avg: 55.8     median: 50 (30%)     max: 67.4 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
13.3 fps (8%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
22.9 fps (13%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 41.16     avg: 50.2     median: 53 (30%)     max: 56.3 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
16.2 fps (9%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.1 fps (23%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 35.28     avg: 45.1     median: 48 (37%)     max: 52 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
25 fps (19%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
7.6 fps (9%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 16.08     avg: 19.5     median: 20 (24%)     max: 22.46 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
8.3 fps (10%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 57     avg: 66.9     median: 57.8 (44%)     max: 86 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
33.5 fps (25%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 35.34     avg: 47.4     median: 51.9 (56%)     max: 55 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
36 fps (39%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 59     avg: 59.2     median: 59.1 (28%)     max: 59.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
11.2 fps (5%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
24.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 43.12     avg: 49.5     median: 52 (27%)     max: 53.4 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
15 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 52.3     avg: 76.4     median: 84.8 (21%)     max: 92 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 39.84     avg: 52.5     median: 52 (8%)     max: 65.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 37     avg: 40.2     median: 39.8 (9%)     max: 43.81 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 17.46     avg: 20.6     median: 22 (6%)     max: 22.34 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 23.08     avg: 44.8     median: 50.4 (14%)     max: 61 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.68     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (4%)     max: 4.85 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 42.17     avg: 57.7     median: 64.8 (26%)     max: 66 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 45.24     avg: 66.7     median: 77 (13%)     max: 77.9 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6519 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 4455     avg: 5650     median: 5649.5 (4%)     max: 6844 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
6771 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 45.4     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (16%)     max: 45.65 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
min: 42.4     avg: 71.1     median: 71.1 (25%)     max: 99.7 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
26.2 fps (9%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 68     avg: 92.1     median: 92.1 (5%)     max: 116.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
249.9 fps (15%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1258     avg: 1273     median: 1273 (6%)     max: 1288 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2234     avg: 2261     median: 2261 (4%)     max: 2288 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4737 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M3000M → 263% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 73% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
114.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
69.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
40.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
33.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
146.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
76.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
54.5  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
23.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
85.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
50.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
43.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
17.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
124.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
59.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
50.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
17.8  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
179  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
123  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
58  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
21  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
122.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
73.1 74.6 ~ 74 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
40.9 42.4 ~ 42 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
22.1 22.5 ~ 22 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
14.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
108.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
89.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
53.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
39.2  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
136.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
69.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
29.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M3000M:
35.3  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
122  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
122  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
122  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
120  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
94  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
87  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
69  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
45  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M3000M:
200  fps
med. 1344x756
Quadro M3000M:
125  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
68  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
54  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
380  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
186  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
151  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
81  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
77.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
43.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
349  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
271  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
217  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
40  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M3000M:
66  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
66  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
25  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
124.5  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
82.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
44.6  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M3000M:
226.3  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
176 182.7 ~ 179 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
163.8 166.7 ~ 165 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
69.7 69.8 ~ 70 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
255.1  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M3000M:
185  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M3000M:
82.1  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
Quadro 1000M:
140.5  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
54  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 1000M:
34.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 1000M:
12.7  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
Quadro 1000M:
450  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
192  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
206.2  fps
64%
Quadro 1000M:
132  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
127.3  fps
57%
Quadro 1000M:
73  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro 1000M:
64.2  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
50.3  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 1000M:
41.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 1000M:
25.1  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
53.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
11.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
66.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
39.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
30.4  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
104.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
70.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
43.3  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
113.5  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
71.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
40  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
187.6  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 3000M:
52.4  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
Quadro 1000M:
121  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
100  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 1000M:
53.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 61%

NVIDIA Quadro M3000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Rise of the Tomb Raider114.969.940.233.4
Rainbow Six Siege146.876.854.523.8
Just Cause 385.650.443.717.8
Star Wars Battlefront124.559.450.917.8
Anno 22051791235821
The Witcher 3122.774422214.1
Dirt Rally108.689.653.639.2
GTA V136.169.129.735.3
F1 2014122122122120
Ryse: Son of Rome94876945
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor2001256854
GRID: Autosport38018615181
Thief88.677.443.1
Total War: Rome II34927121740
Company of Heroes 266665725
Metro: Last Light124.582.944.6
BioShock Infinite226.317916570
Tomb Raider255.118582.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
7


7
11

6
7
5
4
10
3
1



4
2

NVIDIA Quadro 1000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt 3140.55434.5512.68
Fifa 1145019213273
Mafia 264.250.341.525.1
Trackmania Nations Forever12110053.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
3

2

1

2
1
1
2
1
1






NVIDIA Quadro 3000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 11206.2127.3
Metro 203353.811.5
Risen66.739.630.4
Need for Speed Shift104.870.943.3
Colin McRae: DIRT 2113.571.440
Anno 1404187.652.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



1

1
3

1
2
1
1
4

1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 28. 10:15:36

#0 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6507 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2437 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.236s ... 0.237s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.237s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.237s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.047s ... 0.284s

#9 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.01s ... 0.293s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6507 +0.021s ... 0.315s

#11 got single benchmarks 6507 +0.015s ... 0.33s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2437 +0.002s ... 0.332s

#13 got single benchmarks 2437 +0.014s ... 0.346s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.346s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.38s ... 0.727s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.727s

#17 Got 106 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.741s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.741s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.017s ... 0.758s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.062s ... 0.82s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.82s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.822s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)