Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably GF104 like the GeForce GTX 470M). Compared to the 5010M, the 3000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 3000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 3000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

As the GeForce GTX 470M, the Quadro 3000M is specified at 75 Watt TDP and therefore only suited for large laptops with 17 inch displays.

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5010M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (GF100 chip). Therefore, the 5010M is closely related to the  consumer GeForce GTX 480M. The Quadro 5010M is the successor to the Quadro 5000M and also offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards with similar specifications.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi architecture, the 5010M should offer higher levels of performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 5010M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro, the 5010M supports Nvidia Optimus. Note, however, that whether this feature is integrated or not depends on the notebook manufacturer.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5010M is specified at 100 Watt TDP. As a result, only very large laptops, such as the Clevo D901F, are able to house this high-end card.

At the time of arrival (Feb. 2011), the Quadro 5010M succeeds the older Quadrio FX 5000M as the fastest professional workstation graphic card for laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 1000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably the same chip like the consumer GeForce GT 540M). Compared to the 5010M, the 1000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations. According to the clock rates, the Quadro 1000M should be positioned between the GT 540M and 550M.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 1000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 1000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 1000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

The Quadro 1000M is specified at 45 Watt TDP and therefore suited for 15.6" laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro 3000MNVIDIA Quadro 5010MNVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermiN12E-Q5Fermi
ArchitectureFermiFermiFermi
Pipelines240 - unified384 - unified96 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz450 MHz700 MHz
Shader Speed900 MHz900 MHz1400 MHz
Memory Speed625 MHz1300 MHz900 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5 ECCDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB4 GB2048 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption75 Watt100 Watt45 Watt
technology40 nm40 nm40 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32OpenGl 4.1, ECC Memory, FP64 IEEE 754OpenGl 4.1, FP32
Notebook Sizelargelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 22.02.2011 22.02.2011
Transistors3 Billion
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1742 Points (2%)
min: 3032     avg: 3066     median: 3066 (4%)     max: 3100 Points
1064 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1539 Points (1%)
2693 Points (2%)
943 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
7941 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
12991 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
4566 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 6604     avg: 6661     median: 6660.5 (4%)     max: 6717 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
11047 Points (6%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3679 Points (2%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
40779 Points (42%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
52873 Points (28%)
21603 Points (11%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
24769 Points (27%)
16583 Points (18%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark 06
min: 14054     avg: 14221     median: 14220.5 (19%)     max: 14387 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 18617     avg: 19544     median: 19036 (25%)     max: 20979 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
min: 7827     avg: 8312     median: 8509 (11%)     max: 8599 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
41.7 fps (8%)
10.1 fps (2%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
20.4 fps (12%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 34.9     avg: 38.2     median: 38.2 (23%)     max: 41.4 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
13.3 fps (8%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
22.9 fps (13%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 37.6     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (23%)     max: 41.9 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
16.2 fps (9%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.1 fps (23%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 37.93     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (35%)     max: 54.2 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
25 fps (19%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
7.6 fps (9%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 7.99     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (10%)     max: 9.7 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
8.3 fps (10%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 53.6     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (55%)     max: 91.1 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
33.5 fps (25%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 40.01     avg: 47.5     median: 47.5 (51%)     max: 54.9 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
36 fps (39%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 36.73     avg: 37.9     median: 37.9 (18%)     max: 39.1 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
11.2 fps (5%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
24.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 33.89     avg: 38.2     median: 38.1 (20%)     max: 42.4 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
15 fps (8%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
6.6 Points (84%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
6.6 Points (84%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6519 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
6620 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
6771 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 45.4     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (16%)     max: 45.65 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 65.1     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (23%)     max: 69.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
26.2 fps (9%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 158% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 73% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
Quadro 1000M:
140.5  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
54  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
105.4  fps
Quadro 1000M:
34.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
35.3  fps
Quadro 1000M:
12.7  fps
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
81.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
28.2  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
105  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
72.8  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
Quadro 1000M:
450  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
192  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
206.2  fps
130%
Quadro 5010M:
268.6  fps
64%
Quadro 1000M:
132  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
127.3  fps
127%
Quadro 5010M:
162.3  fps
57%
Quadro 1000M:
73  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro 1000M:
64.2  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
50.3  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
86.6  fps
Quadro 1000M:
41.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
51.9  fps
Quadro 1000M:
25.1  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
98.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
52.7  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
53.8  fps
high 1600x900
Quadro 5010M:
37.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
11.5  fps
127%
Quadro 5010M:
14.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
88.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
45.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
93.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
62.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
66.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
39.6  fps
162%
Quadro 5010M:
64.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
30.4  fps
138%
Quadro 5010M:
41.9  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
120.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
73.3  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
104.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
70.9  fps
153%
Quadro 5010M:
108.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
43.3  fps
155%
Quadro 5010M:
67  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
113.5  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
71.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
40  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
187.6  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 3000M:
52.4  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
Quadro 1000M:
121  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro 1000M:
100  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 1000M:
53.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 142%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 152%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 61%

NVIDIA Quadro 1000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt 3140.55434.5512.68
Fifa 1145019213273
Mafia 264.250.341.525.1
Trackmania Nations Forever12110053.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
3

2

1

2
1
1
2
1
1






NVIDIA Quadro 5010Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt 3105.435.3
Crysis 281.628.2
Call of Duty: Black Ops10572.8
Fifa 11268.6162.3
Mafia 286.651.9
StarCraft 298.452.7
Metro 203337.914.6
Battlefield: Bad Company 288.945.3
CoD Modern Warfare 293.462.5
Risen64.341.9
Resident Evil 5120.673.3
Need for Speed Shift108.567
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1
9
2
2
5
4
1






NVIDIA Quadro 3000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 11206.2127.3
Metro 203353.811.5
Risen66.739.630.4
Need for Speed Shift104.870.943.3
Colin McRae: DIRT 2113.571.440
Anno 1404187.652.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



1

1
3

1
2
1
1
4

1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 18. 14:33:12

#0 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2429 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2437 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.161s ... 0.162s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.162s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.162s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.038s ... 0.2s

#9 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.008s ... 0.208s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2429 +0.002s ... 0.21s

#11 got single benchmarks 2429 +0.008s ... 0.218s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2437 +0.002s ... 0.219s

#13 got single benchmarks 2437 +0.009s ... 0.228s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.228s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.24s ... 0.468s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.468s

#17 Got 54 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.473s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.473s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s ... 0.484s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.035s ... 0.519s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.519s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.521s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)