NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

► remove

The NVIDIA Quadro 2000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (likely the GF104 or GF106). It offers the same amount of shaders like the GeForce GTX 460M, but only a 128 Bit memory bus for DDR3 memory. The slow DDR3 memory in particular could be a bottleneck to the GPU

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

The shader/CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 2000M should offer high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 2000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia, NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 2000M supports Nvidia Optimus. The implementation of the technology into specific notebook models is dependent on the laptop vendor.

The Quadro 2000M is specified at 55 Watt TDP and is therefore best suited for 15.6" or greater laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M1200

The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M1200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M. The Quadro M1200M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M1000M (950M based).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The performance of the Quadro M1200 is on a level to the previous generation M2000M which is also based on the 960M. In games it is comparable to the GTX 960M although the driver support is not optimized for gaming.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M1200 is rated for the same TGP of 45 Watt (32.5 Watt TDP) and therefore a bit lower than the M2000M with 55 Watt TGP.

NVIDIA Quadro 2000MNVIDIA Quadro M1200
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermiN17P-Q1
ArchitectureFermiMaxwell
Cores192 - unified640 - unified
Core550 MHz991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Shader1100 MHz
Memory900 MHz5000 MHz
Bus128 Bit128 Bit
MemoryDDR3GDDR5
Max. Memory2048 MB4096 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 11, 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), 5.0
Technology40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Size1/32/3
Introduced22.02.2011 13.01.2017
Transistors1870 Million
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1290 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
240298 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
42129 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12632     avg: 14705     median: 13600 (18%)     max: 17884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 26860     avg: 27557     median: 27557 (14%)     max: 28254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3759     avg: 3846     median: 3878 (12%)     max: 3900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4118     avg: 4142     median: 4141.5 (10%)     max: 4165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
63463 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1416     avg: 1422     median: 1421 (4%)     max: 1428 Points
min: 5513     avg: 5515     median: 5514.5 (14%)     max: 5516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1259     avg: 1261     median: 1261 (2%)     max: 1263 Points
min: 5105     avg: 5310     median: 5310 (9%)     max: 5515 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
21287 Points (31%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
27.7 fps (15%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
30.1 fps (10%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.9 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 14.1     avg: 17     median: 17 (3%)     max: 19.8 fps
28.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1200
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 656     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (8%)     max: 979 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 852     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (8%)     max: 1562 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
388 (1%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 74.8     avg: 87.5     median: 87.5 (19%)     max: 100.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 2000M → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1200 → 231% n=13

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
79  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
34  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
12  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
88.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
49.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
28.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
23.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
9.9  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
74  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
63  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
35  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M1200:
11  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
73.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
26.3 29 fps ~ 28 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
13 fps  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M1200:
93.3  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
50.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
26.2  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M1200:
189 224.7 ~ 207 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
130.8 137 ~ 134 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M1200:
113.1 125 ~ 119 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M1200:
42.6 47 ~ 45 fps
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
86.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
75  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
71.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
41.7  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
92  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
59  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
92  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
71  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
59.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
35.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
165 243 ~ 204 fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
82  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
45  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
23 37 ~ 30 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
64.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
46.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
22.8  fps
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
200.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
74.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
59.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
37.6  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
62  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 2000M:
36 43 ~ 40 fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
269  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
93  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 2000M:
47.9  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 2000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)