Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 2000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (likely the GF104 or GF106). It offers the same amount of shaders like the GeForce GTX 460M, but only a 128 Bit memory bus for DDR3 memory. The slow DDR3 memory in particular could be a bottleneck to the GPU

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

The shader/CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 2000M should offer high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 2000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia, NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 2000M supports Nvidia Optimus. The implementation of the technology into specific notebook models is dependent on the laptop vendor.

The Quadro 2000M is specified at 55 Watt TDP and is therefore best suited for 15.6" or greater laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5010M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (GF100 chip). Therefore, the 5010M is closely related to the  consumer GeForce GTX 480M. The Quadro 5010M is the successor to the Quadro 5000M and also offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards with similar specifications.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi architecture, the 5010M should offer higher levels of performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 5010M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro, the 5010M supports Nvidia Optimus. Note, however, that whether this feature is integrated or not depends on the notebook manufacturer.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5010M is specified at 100 Watt TDP. As a result, only very large laptops, such as the Clevo D901F, are able to house this high-end card.

At the time of arrival (Feb. 2011), the Quadro 5010M succeeds the older Quadrio FX 5000M as the fastest professional workstation graphic card for laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro 2000MNVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermiN12E-Q5
ArchitectureFermiFermi
Pipelines192 - unified384 - unified
Core Speed550 MHz450 MHz
Shader Speed1100 MHz900 MHz
Memory Speed900 MHz1300 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5 ECC
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption55 Watt100 Watt
technology40 nm40 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32OpenGl 4.1, ECC Memory, FP64 IEEE 754
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 22.02.2011
Transistors3 Billion
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-mobi...

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1416     avg: 1422     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1428 Points
min: 3032     avg: 3066     median: 3066 (6%)     max: 3100 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1259     avg: 1261     median: 1261 (2%)     max: 1263 Points
2693 Points (4%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6608     avg: 6634     median: 6633.5 (2%)     max: 6659 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
12991 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5391     avg: 5411     median: 5410.5 (4%)     max: 5430 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
11047 Points (7%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
52873 Points (28%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
21287 Points (24%)
24769 Points (28%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
3DMark 06
min: 11575     avg: 11659     median: 11656 (17%)     max: 11747 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 18617     avg: 19544     median: 19036 (28%)     max: 20979 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 14.1     avg: 17     median: 17 (3%)     max: 19.8 fps
41.7 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 19.28     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (14%)     max: 19.32 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 34.9     avg: 38.2     median: 38.2 (27%)     max: 41.4 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 22.13     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (37%)     max: 22.52 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 37.6     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (67%)     max: 41.9 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 32.8     avg: 33.1     median: 33.1 (40%)     max: 33.4 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 37.93     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (56%)     max: 54.2 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 9.45     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (40%)     max: 9.83 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 7.99     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (37%)     max: 9.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 45.28     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (34%)     max: 45.96 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 53.6     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (55%)     max: 91.1 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 40.8     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (45%)     max: 42.93 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 40.01     avg: 47.5     median: 47.5 (51%)     max: 54.9 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 17.84     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (9%)     max: 17.96 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 36.73     avg: 37.9     median: 37.9 (18%)     max: 39.1 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 27.08     avg: 27.4     median: 27.4 (33%)     max: 27.69 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 33.89     avg: 38.2     median: 38.1 (46%)     max: 42.4 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
7.5 Points (95%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
7.5 Points (95%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
5671 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
6620 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 38.3     avg: 38.4     median: 38.4 (14%)     max: 38.44 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 65.1     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (25%)     max: 69.9 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 2000M → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 163% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
105.4 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
35.3 fps  fps
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
81.6 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
28.2 fps  fps
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
86.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
75  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
71.7  fps
146%
Quadro 5010M:
105  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
41.7  fps
175%
Quadro 5010M:
72.8  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
92  fps
292%
Quadro 5010M:
268.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
59  fps
275%
Quadro 5010M:
162.3  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
92  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
71  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
59.1  fps
147%
Quadro 5010M:
86.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
35.1  fps
148%
Quadro 5010M:
51.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
165 243 ~ 204 fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
82  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
45  fps
219%
Quadro 5010M:
98.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
23 37 ~ 30 fps
176%
Quadro 5010M:
52.7  fps
high 1600x900
Quadro 5010M:
37.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
14.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
64.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
46.9  fps
190%
Quadro 5010M:
88.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
22.8  fps
199%
Quadro 5010M:
45.3  fps
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
200.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
74.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
59.5  fps
157%
Quadro 5010M:
93.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
37.6  fps
166%
Quadro 5010M:
62.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
64.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
41.9  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
120.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
73.3  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
108.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
67  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
62  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 2000M:
36 43 ~ 40 fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
269  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
93  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 2000M:
47.9  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 2000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 191%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 172%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 04. 14:45:35

#0 checking url part for id 2435 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2429 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:27:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.042s ... 0.042s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.048s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.048s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 2435 +0.026s ... 0.074s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#27 got single benchmarks 2435 +0.007s ... 0.081s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 2429 +0s ... 0.082s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#32 got single benchmarks 2429 +0.005s ... 0.088s

#33 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.088s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.089s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.093s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.095s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.096s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.096s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.097s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.098s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.099s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.099s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.1s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.101s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.102s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.102s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.103s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.103s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.105s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.106s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.107s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#103 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.109s

#104 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.109s

#105 Got 53 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.115s

#106 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.116s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#139 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.119s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.121s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.122s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.123s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.124s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.125s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.125s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.128s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.132s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.133s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.134s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#193 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.134s

#194 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.134s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.044s ... 0.178s

#196 return log +0.002s ... 0.18s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)