NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro 1000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably the same chip like the consumer GeForce GT 540M ). Compared to the 5010M, the 1000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations. According to the clock rates, the Quadro 1000M should be positioned between the GT 540M and 550M.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.
The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 1000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations .
Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 1000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.
To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 1000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).
The Quadro 1000M is specified at 45 Watt TDP and therefore suited for 15.6" laptops.
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro 4000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (or more specifically, probably the GF104). Unlike the 5010M, the 4000M does not support ECC memory and dual-precision (DP) floating point calculations.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications such as CAD or DCC. As a result, multiple scientific or business disciplines can make use of the workstation GPU. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than consumer-oriented GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering or DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 4000M should offer higher performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.
Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 4000M is compatible with 3D Vision Pro, a new software solution by Nvidia for stereoscopic output.
The 4000M supports Nvidia Optimus in order to automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro for power-saving purposes. Whether or not this feature is supported on a laptop, however, is dependent on the laptop manufacturer.
Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 4000M is specified at 100 Watt TDP and is therefore only found in large laptops such as the Clevo D901F .
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M ► remove from comparison
The 28 nm Nvidia Quadro M2000M is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a (first generation) Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM07 chip with 640 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M or 950M . The Quadro M2000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is the successor to the Kepler-based Quadro K2100M . The M2000M typically comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective at 80 GB/s compared to 48 GB/s on the K2100M).
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
As the exact clock speed of the M2000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, we do know that it is a mid-range model from the mobile 2015 Quadro line based on the same chip as the GeForce GTX 960M or 950M. Therefore, it should be faster than the old Quadro K2100M.
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M2000M can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M2000M is rated for the same TGP of 55 Watt as the K2100M, including the board and memory components. Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and larger.
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M NVIDIA Quadro 4000M NVIDIA Quadro M2000M Quadro M Series Codename Fermi Fermi Architecture Fermi Fermi Maxwell Pipelines 96 - unified 336 - unified 640 - unified Core Speed 700 MHz 475 MHz 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz Shader Speed 1400 MHz 950 MHz Memory Speed 900 MHz 1200 MHz 5000 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 256 Bit 128 Bit Memory Type DDR3 GDDR5 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB 4 GB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 Power Consumption 45 Watt 100 Watt 55 Watt technology 40 nm 40 nm 28 nm Features OpenGl 4.1, FP32 OpenGl 4.1, FP32 Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus Notebook Size medium sized large large Date of Announcement 22.02.2011 22.02.2011 02.10.2015 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.com Transistors 1.9 Billion
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2000M
1.9 pt (6%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 107575 avg: 110819 median: 111917 (14%) max: 112966 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 16337 avg: 17599 median: 17603.5 (19%) max: 18273 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 26669 avg: 29145 median: 29795 (8%) max: 30769 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3794 avg: 3875 median: 3859 (7%) max: 4007 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4053 avg: 4157 median: 4157 (5%) max: 4299 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 39220 avg: 113595 median: 123306 (15%) max: 199166 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1064 Points (1%)
min: 2229 avg: 2335 median: 2334.5 (3%) max: 2440 Points
min: 5375 avg: 5486 median: 5456 (8%) max: 5653 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
943 Points (1%)
min: 2025 avg: 2092 median: 2092 (2%) max: 2159 Points
min: 4997 avg: 5134 median: 5143 (4%) max: 5280 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
4566 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
10722 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 20018 avg: 20537 median: 20567 (6%) max: 21026 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3679 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
9184 Points (5%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 19209 avg: 19354 median: 19235 (11%) max: 19619 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
40779 Points (42%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
21603 Points (11%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
16583 Points (18%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
min: 7827 avg: 8312 median: 8509 (11%) max: 8599 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
17727 Points (23%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 24844 avg: 25964 median: 25604 (33%) max: 27269 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 20.3 avg: 20.4 median: 20.4 (7%) max: 20.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 51.8 avg: 52.7 median: 52.7 (17%) max: 53.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 32.4 avg: 42 median: 42.1 (19%) max: 51.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
10.1 fps (2%)
31.4 fps (6%)
min: 70.8 avg: 72.9 median: 72.6 (14%) max: 75.7 fps
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
13.3 fps (8%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
26.4 fps (16%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 42.14 avg: 44.4 median: 43.1 (26%) max: 55.8 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
16.2 fps (9%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
29.2 fps (17%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 42.91 avg: 44.9 median: 44.2 (25%) max: 50.3 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
25 fps (19%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
39.1 fps (30%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 46.29 avg: 50.2 median: 49.7 (38%) max: 54.2 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
8.3 fps (10%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
10.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 16.42 avg: 19.8 median: 19.6 (23%) max: 23 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
33.5 fps (25%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
51.4 fps (39%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 56.9 avg: 65 median: 57.7 (44%) max: 124.2 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
36 fps (39%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
42.1 fps (45%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 48.27 avg: 55.1 median: 55 (59%) max: 67.8 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
11.2 fps (5%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
24.9 fps (12%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 42.21 avg: 45.6 median: 46.2 (22%) max: 47.08 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
15 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
36.5 fps (19%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 48.34 avg: 53.6 median: 53.5 (28%) max: 61.6 fps
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 63 avg: 69.5 median: 70.2 (17%) max: 74.7 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 32.41 avg: 33.5 median: 33.2 (5%) max: 35.87 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 20.58 avg: 22.3 median: 21.9 (5%) max: 24.25 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 14.4 avg: 15.2 median: 14.7 (4%) max: 18.19 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 29.89 avg: 35.4 median: 35.7 (10%) max: 38.46 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 3.13 avg: 3.3 median: 3.2 (3%) max: 3.98 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 37.48 avg: 40.2 median: 39.7 (16%) max: 45 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 44.29 avg: 45.8 median: 45.8 (8%) max: 47.08 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
40 fps (7%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
7.1 Points (90%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
7.1 Points (90%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6771 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
6638 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 4519 avg: 5471 median: 4616 (3%) max: 6841 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
26.2 fps (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
46 fps (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
min: 43.32 avg: 77.7 median: 88.8 (31%) max: 94.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 45.03 avg: 90.7 median: 92.7 (5%) max: 115.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
78.1 fps (9%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
122.9 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
163.9 fps (10%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2000M GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
310.7 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 626 avg: 798 median: 791 (4%) max: 930 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 961 avg: 1344 median: 1426 (2%) max: 1556 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 3095 avg: 3145 median: 3145 (3%) max: 3195 Points
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 100% n=16 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 4000M → 195% n=16 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2000M → 349% n=16
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro M2000M:
51.8 52 ~ 52 fps
Quadro M2000M:
69 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
69 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 69 fps
Quadro M2000M:
56 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
57 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
60 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 58 fps
Quadro M2000M:
31 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
31 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
32 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
33 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 32 fps
Quadro M2000M:
22 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
23 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
23 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
23 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 23 fps
Quadro M2000M:
10 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
fps
Quadro M2000M:
67.7 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
68 75.7 76.2 76.8 81 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 74 fps
Quadro M2000M:
42.7 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
45.8 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
46.8 47 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
47.1 47.3 49 53 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 47 fps
Quadro M2000M:
19.5 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
19.9 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
20.2 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
22 23 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
25.5 25.9 26.3 ~ 23 fps
Quadro M2000M:
13.2 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
13.3 13.4 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
13.6 13.6 13.8 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
15 16 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 14 fps
Quadro M2000M:
8 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
9.4 ~ 9 fps
Quadro M2000M:
68.7 76 ~ 72 fps
Quadro M2000M:
32.7 33 ~ 33 fps
Quadro M2000M:
60 78 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
89.2 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 76 fps
Quadro M2000M:
56.1 58.8 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
60.7 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
61.9 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 59 fps
Quadro M2000M:
49.5 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
50.2 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
51 51.7 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
53.2 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 51 fps
Quadro M2000M:
26.3 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
26.4 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
27.1 27.3 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
27.8 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 27 fps
Quadro M2000M:
209.8 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
232.7 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 221 fps
Quadro M2000M:
156.6 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
174.6 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
174.9 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 169 fps
Quadro M2000M:
130.4 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
134.2 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
143.4 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
145.1 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 138 fps
Quadro M2000M:
24.7 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
25.5 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
25.5 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
26.2 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 25 fps
Quadro M2000M:
187.9 193 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
204.9 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
211 219 219 ~ 206 fps
Quadro M2000M:
128 128.7 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
131.8 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
132.3 132.8 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
133 139 ~ 132 fps
Quadro M2000M:
112.7 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
112.9 113.7 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
114.7 114.8 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
115.8 122.8 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
123 ~ 116 fps
Quadro M2000M:
39.5 42.5 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
42.6 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
43.3 44.1 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
45 46.5 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
72.2 ~ 47 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
140.5 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
34.6 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
12.7 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
450 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
192 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
132 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
64.2 fps
238%
Quadro M2000M:
149.8 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
155.5 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 153 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
50.3 fps
286%
Quadro M2000M:
139.9 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
141.8 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
149.8 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 144 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
41.5 fps
306%
Quadro M2000M:
120.5 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
126.9 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
128.1 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
134.3 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 127 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
25.1 fps
311%
Quadro M2000M:
75.6 [X] MSI WT72-6QJ Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2.6GHz
Quadro M2000M
77.7 [X] Lenovo ThinkPad P50 20ENV509PB Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 2.9GHz
Quadro M2000M
78.3 [X] HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
81.6 [X] MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 2.8GHz
Quadro M2000M
~ 78 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
121 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
100 fps
100%
Quadro 1000M:
53.2 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2000M → 285% NVIDIA Quadro M2000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Rise of the Tomb Raider 72 46 26 22 11 Rainbow Six Siege 154.1 101 52 38 16.4 Just Cause 3 70.9 59 34 30 12.2 Star Wars Battlefront 131 83.1 38.9 32.7 Batman: Arkham Knight 69 58 32 23 10 The Witcher 3 74 47 23 14 9 Dirt Rally 233 118 72 33 GTA V 121.1 110.1 42.2 17.5 Thief 76 59 51 27 Total War: Rome II 221 169 138 25 Metro: Last Light 110 90 54 29 BioShock Infinite 206 132 116 47 Tomb Raider 348.7 162.8 107.3 51.5 Mafia 2 153 144 127 78 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 6 8 5 5 4 2 7 3 2 7 6 1 5
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Dirt 3 140.5 54 34.55 12.68 Fifa 11 450 192 132 73 Mafia 2 64.2 50.3 41.5 25.1 Trackmania Nations Forever 121 100 53.2 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K StarCraft 2 180 112 79 71 Anno 1404 173 62 Sims 3 279 165 79 Racedriver: GRID 188 148 117 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 1 2 3 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 25. 19:41:39
#0 checking url part for id 2437 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 2431 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 6508 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.167s ... 0.168s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.169s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.169s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2437 +0.051s ... 0.22s
#9 got single benchmarks 2437 +0.015s ... 0.235s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2431 +0.002s ... 0.237s
#11 got single benchmarks 2431 +0.01s ... 0.247s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 6508 +0.02s ... 0.267s
#13 got single benchmarks 6508 +0.027s ... 0.294s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.294s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.406s ... 0.7s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.7s
#17 Got 207 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.718s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.718s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.015s ... 0.733s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.049s ... 0.782s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.782s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.784s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)