, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Pro A10-8700B vs AMD A8-8600P vs AMD Pro A12-8800B

AMD Pro A10-8700B

► remove from comparison AMD Pro A10-8700B

The AMD Pro A10-8700B is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

It is similar to the consumer version, the A10-8700P, but offers business support and a ensure a long-tail support program. 

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD A8-8600P

► remove from comparison AMD A8-8600P

The AMD A8-8600P is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC that contains two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding). Compared to the faster A10-8700P, the A8-8600P features a slower clocked CPU and GPU.

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. The faster Carrizo models gain about 35% in 3DMark 11 depending on the cTDP and results for the A8-8600P model should be similar.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD Pro A12-8800B

► remove from comparison AMD Pro A12-8800B

The AMD Pro A12-8800B is the top-tier Carrizo APU of 2015 for business laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 8 compute cores (512 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding). It is similar to the consumer version, the FX-8800P, but offers business support and a ensure a long-tail support program. 

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1992 points (15 Watts) to 2753 points (+38% with 35 Watts cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (based on the similar FX-8800P).

According to AMD, the 35 Watt configuration scores 12% (Cinebench single-thread) and 15% (Cinebench Multi-threaded) higher compared to the previous Steamroller generation (most likely the AMD FX-7600P). If configured to 15 Watt instead, the gains are higher (40% to 55%) compared to the 19 Watt Kaveri FX-7500 APU. See more benchmarks on our FX-8800P page.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD Pro A10-8700BAMD A8-8600PAMD Pro A12-8800B
AMD CarrizoAMD CarrizoAMD Carrizo
CarrizoCarrizoCarrizo
Series: Carrizo Carrizo
AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
» AMD Pro A10-8700B1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A10-8700B1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
» AMD Pro A12-8800B2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A10-8700B1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
1800 - 3200 MHz1600 - 3000 MHz2100 - 3400 MHz
2 MB2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 44 / 4
12 - 35 12-35 12-35
3100 3100 3100
28 28 28
FP4 BGAFP4 BGAFP4 BGA
HSA 1.0HSA 1.0HSA 1.0
iGPUAMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
AMD Carrizo Pro A10-8700B

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
192 Points (2%)
min: 202     avg: 207     median: 206 (2%)     max: 212 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
70 Points (26%)
min: 71     avg: 73.3     median: 72 (26%)     max: 77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.3 Points (4%)
min: 2.45     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (5%)     max: 2.58 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (26%)
min: 0.88     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (29%)     max: 0.93 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2200 (20%)
min: 2183     avg: 2236     median: 2236 (20%)     max: 2289
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5907 (10%)
min: 6009     avg: 6220     median: 6219.5 (10%)     max: 6430
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 7270     avg: 8224     median: 8224 (8%)     max: 9178 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3015     avg: 3057     median: 3057 (22%)     max: 3099 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
949 s (11%)
min: 501.747     avg: 516     median: 516.3 (6%)     max: 530.94 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
30.7 s (6%)
min: 16.191     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 16.788 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
897 (6%)
min: 1293     avg: 1336     median: 1336 (9%)     max: 1379
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.1 fps (4%)
min: 15.84     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (7%)     max: 15.85 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
45.4 fps (13%)
min: 71.99     avg: 75.9     median: 75.9 (22%)     max: 79.71 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (4%)
min: 0.195     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (8%)     max: 0.205 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (5%)
min: 0.313     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (9%)     max: 0.328 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (3%)
min: 1.5     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (6%)     max: 1.6 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2798 Points (15%)
min: 2715     avg: 2871     median: 2769 (15%)     max: 3130 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
43.1 s (9%)
min: 19     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.703 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
94.7 s (4%)
min: 42     avg: 43.9     median: 43.9 (2%)     max: 45.77 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1994 s (9%)
min: 898     avg: 934     median: 934.5 (4%)     max: 970.961 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 6609     avg: 6624     median: 6623.5 (8%)     max: 6638 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2096     avg: 2124     median: 2123.5 (8%)     max: 2151 Points
min: 2228     avg: 2375     median: 2361 (9%)     max: 2536 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
21226 Points (14%)
min: 23849     avg: 24509     median: 24550 (16%)     max: 25128 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 21853     avg: 23645     median: 23645 (25%)     max: 25437 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 25429     avg: 25705     median: 25705 (27%)     max: 25981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1870 Points (5%)
min: 1779     avg: 1920     median: 1850 (5%)     max: 2130 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1375     avg: 1976     median: 1975.5 (5%)     max: 2576 Points
min: 2293     avg: 2639     median: 2560 (6%)     max: 3064 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
675 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2728 (5%)
4691 (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
950 (20%)
1969 (40%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2906 (5%)
4949 (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1030 (21%)
2079 (42%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2262.4     avg: 3038     median: 3038.1 (5%)     max: 3813.7 ms
min: 2092.6     avg: 3152     median: 3152 (5%)     max: 4211.4 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 181.6     avg: 193     median: 193.4 (2%)     max: 205.1 ms
min: 139.7     avg: 165     median: 165.4 (2%)     max: 191 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 9042     avg: 12632     median: 12632 (18%)     max: 16222 Points
7621 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Pro A10-8700B → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Pro A12-8800B → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.16
log 02. 09:37:31

#0 checking url part for id 7008 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6846 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7007 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Aug 2021 13:08:38 +0200 +0s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.012s ... 0.013s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7008 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#8 got single benchmarks 7008 +0.007s ... 0.021s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6846 +0s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 6846 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 7007 +0s ... 0.025s

#12 got single benchmarks 7007 +0.007s ... 0.033s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.077s ... 0.109s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.109s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)