AMD Pro A10-8700B vs AMD A10-8700P

AMD Pro A10-8700B

► remove AMD Pro A10-8700B

The AMD Pro A10-8700B is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

It is similar to the consumer version, the A10-8700P, but offers business support and a ensure a long-tail support program. 

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD A10-8700P

► remove AMD A10-8700P

The AMD A10-8700P is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD Pro A10-8700BAMD A10-8700P
AMD CarrizoAMD Carrizo
CarrizoCarrizo
: Carrizo Carrizo
AMD FX-8800P (compare)2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B (compare)2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-8700P1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
» AMD Pro A10-8700B1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD FX-8800P (compare)2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B (compare)2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-8700P1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A10-8700B1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
1800 - 3200 MHz1800 - 3200 MHz
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
12 - 35 12 - 35
3100 3100
28 28
FP4 BGAFP4 BGA
HSA 1.0HSA 1.0
iGPUAMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)
AMD Carrizo Pro A10-8700BAMD Carrizo A10-8700P

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
192 Points (4%)
min: 175     avg: 190.1     median: 194 (4%)     max: 198 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
70 Points (32%)
min: 59     avg: 67.6     median: 69 (32%)     max: 75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
2.3 Points (5%)
2.3 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.8 Points (41%)
0.8 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
2200 Points (24%)
min: 2170     avg: 2293.7     median: 2334 (26%)     max: 2389 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
5907 Points (9%)
min: 4808     avg: 6139.8     median: 6394 (10%)     max: 6443 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 8279     avg: 8769.3     median: 8924 (12%)     max: 8949 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 3080     avg: 3211.8     median: 3251 (31%)     max: 3264 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
948.5 seconds (11%)
min: 507     avg: 536     median: 509 (6%)     max: 591 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
30.7 seconds (6%)
min: 16     avg: 17.1     median: 17 (3%)     max: 17 seconds
WinRAR - Result
897 KB/s (11%)
min: 1293     avg: 1316.3     median: 1328 (16%)     max: 1328 KB/s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
9.1 fps (0%)
15.1 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
45.4 fps (17%)
min: 72     avg: 73.5     median: 73 (27%)     max: 74 fps
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (5%)
0.2 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (6%)
0.3 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.9 GB/s (4%)
1.5 GB/s (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
2798 Points (19%)
min: 2776     avg: 2985.3     median: 2977 (20%)     max: 3186 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
43.1 Seconds (9%)
min: 19     avg: 20.6     median: 20 (4%)     max: 22 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
94.7 Seconds (4%)
min: 44     avg: 46.1     median: 44 (2%)     max: 50 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1994 Seconds (9%)
min: 954     avg: 984.5     median: 963 (4%)     max: 1071 Seconds
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 6309     avg: 6652.6     median: 6586 (9%)     max: 7129 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 2096     avg: 2123.5     median: 2123 (11%)     max: 2151 points
min: 1794     avg: 2134.1     median: 2150 (11%)     max: 2310 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
21226 Points (14%)
min: 13862     avg: 19940.5     median: 20873 (13%)     max: 22998 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 13248     avg: 20904.2     median: 21997 (26%)     max: 23111 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 21515     avg: 23082     median: 23204 (27%)     max: 24168 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
1870 Points (5%)
min: 1774     avg: 1897.2     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 2007 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
min: 1375     avg: 1975.5     median: 1975 (6%)     max: 2576 Points
min: 2456     avg: 2673.3     median: 2685 (8%)     max: 2803 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
2728 Points (3%)
min: 4550     avg: 4669.5     median: 4676 (6%)     max: 4775 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
950 Points (19%)
min: 1941     avg: 1974.3     median: 1975 (41%)     max: 2006 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
2906 Points (8%)
min: 4832     avg: 5014     median: 5105 (14%)     max: 5105 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
1030 Points (21%)
min: 2065     avg: 2135     median: 2170 (44%)     max: 2170 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 2262     avg: 3038.1     median: 3038 (5%)     max: 3813 ms
min: 2229     avg: 2673.3     median: 2285 (4%)     max: 3488 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 181     avg: 193.4     median: 193 (2%)     max: 205 ms
min: 154     avg: 203     median: 164 (2%)     max: 363 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 9042     avg: 12632     median: 12632 (24%)     max: 16222 Points
min: 8324     avg: 11931.2     median: 11800 (23%)     max: 15801 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD Pro A10-8700B → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-8700P → 120%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)