Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Celeron J4005

Intel Pentium N4200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium N4200 is an Apollo Lake family, quad-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its four cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.5 GHz, with only 2.4 GHz available when all the cores are fully loaded; there is no Hyper-Threading here and thus no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 505, and eats very little (~6 W).

Curiously enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Pentium as of early 2023.

Architecture

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Pentium is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products such as the Raspberry Pi series.

The Pentium N4200 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture that came to replace Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations, making for a double-digit IPC improvement.

The Pentium is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Pentium is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N4200 in our database competes with the Core i5-3339Y, a power efficient chip launched in 2013, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, with the (much less ancient) Celeron 6305 lurking a little behind the two. In other words, the Pentium is a slow processor suitable for the most basic tasks only. As of 2021, it is light years behind the latest processors making use of high-performance architectures, such as the Zen 2-powered AMD Ryzen 3 5300U.

The Acer Aspire ES 17 ES1-732 is among the fastest laptops built around the N4200 that we know of. It can be around 50% faster than the slowest system featuring the same CPU in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 505 (18 EUs) is a rather good iGPU, considering this is a lower-end SoC released in 2016 we are talking about. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD 505 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors simultaneously at up to 2160p60. It will also happily decode VP9 and AVC, the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on as of 2021.

The UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz. Its actual clock speed will be much lower than that, since the small power budget has to be shared between the iGPU and the CPU cores. Expect most games to run terrible, even ones that were released in 2012 or 2010.

Power consumption

Just like most other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N4200 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the Power Limit 1), making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by just one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, improves the chip's performance by a huge margin, speaking subjectively.

This Pentium is built with a 14 nm Intel process making for poor energy efficiency (considering 14 nm processes are really old as of mid 2022).

Intel Celeron N4000

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4000

The Intel Celeron N4000 is a dual-core SoC designed for affordable laptops and mini-PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1 GHz to 2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst maxes out at 2.5 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features a larger L2 cache (4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4000 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4300Y, a fairly old dual-core processor of nearly the same energy efficiency, in multi-thread performance. In other words, the Celeron is a very slow processor that's good enough for the most basic of tasks only. Expect long load times no matter the app.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 650 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other N-class Intel chips, the Celeron N4000 has a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is not much at all, allowing laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs around the chip. The SoC can briefly consume up to 15 W, though, depending on how a system is configured.

Last but not the least, this Celeron is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron J4005

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron J4005 is a dual-core desktop SoC primarily for mini PCs and mini ITX mainboards. It runs at 2 - 2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is permanently soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4005 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N3450 and the Celeron 3865U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an abysmally poor result, as of early 2023.

Power consumption

This Celeron series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 10 W. That's not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops and mini-PCs.

The J4005 is built with one of Intel's old 14 nm processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Pentium N4200Intel Celeron N4000Intel Celeron J4005
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameApollo LakeGemini LakeGemini Lake
Clock1100 - 2500 MHz1100 - 2600 MHz2000 - 2700 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 22 / 2
TDP6 Watt6 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1296BGA1090BGA1090
FeaturesDDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AESDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 505 (200 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$161 U.S.$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 « 2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
L1 Cache112 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4000
15.2 pt (21%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
160 Points (18%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
273 Points (1%)
min: 121     avg: 132.7     median: 138 (1%)     max: 139 Points
144 Points (1%)
min: 65     avg: 70.3     median: 70.9 (21%)     max: 75 Points
77 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.02     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (3%)     max: 2.27 Points
1.7 Points (2%)
1.4 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.64     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.66 Points
0.9 Points (22%)
0.9 Points (21%)
2152 Points (13%)
2085 Points (13%)
4030 Points (3%)
3500 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 7699     avg: 7766     median: 7766 (5%)     max: 7833 Points
4741 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2375     avg: 2392     median: 2392 (3%)     max: 2409 Points
3365 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 704     avg: 714     median: 714 (8%)     max: 724 s
1007 s (12%)
1042 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 20.13     avg: 22.6     median: 22.6 (5%)     max: 25.03 s
31.9 s (6%)
33.1 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
944 Points (1%)
760 Points (1%)
798 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
4114 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2298 MIPS (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
9.5 fps (3%)
10 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60 fps (14%)
47.3 fps (11%)
49.9 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.8 fps (1%)
0.9 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.4 GB/s (4%)
0.9 GB/s (2%)
1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4736 Seconds (33%)
4124 Seconds (29%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (36%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2636 Points (6%)
2259 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
31.4 s (7%)
25.3 s (5%)
16.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
68.4 s (3%)
57.5 s (2%)
35.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1453 s (6%)
1295 s (6%)
1245 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4306 Points (4%)
min: 1638     avg: 1713     median: 1712.5 (5%)     max: 1787 Points
1877 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 15955     avg: 18834     median: 18514.5 (15%)     max: 22351 Points
18895 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9441     avg: 16242     median: 17153 (14%)     max: 21222 Points
18968 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17050     avg: 22089     median: 22096 (19%)     max: 26889 Points
19351 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1574     avg: 1754     median: 1727 (4%)     max: 2034 Points
1577 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2330     avg: 2608     median: 2525 (5%)     max: 3054 Points
1974 Points (4%)
2241 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 642     avg: 694     median: 668 (3%)     max: 771 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1389 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
345 Points (15%)
min: 431     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (18%)     max: 436 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
935 Points (2%)
min: 797     avg: 802     median: 801.5 (1%)     max: 806 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
434 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
791 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1544     avg: 1576     median: 1571.5 (16%)     max: 1616 Points
1862 Points (19%)
1997 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4468     avg: 4604     median: 4608.5 (5%)     max: 4729 Points
3219 Points (4%)
3491 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1526     avg: 1563     median: 1560.5 (21%)     max: 1609 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4162     avg: 4385     median: 4376.5 (11%)     max: 4558 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4425     avg: 4593     median: 4595 (8%)     max: 4736 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1362     avg: 1394     median: 1395.5 (27%)     max: 1430 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4867 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1498 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3199 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2447 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4201 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4784 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3954 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2966     avg: 3044     median: 3027 (4%)     max: 3142 ms
min: 2306     avg: 2382     median: 2381.5 (3%)     max: 2457 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
232 ms (3%)
446.5 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8632     avg: 11881     median: 12856 (12%)     max: 13290 Points
15679 Points (14%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 71.2     avg: 78.6     median: 78.6 (16%)     max: 86 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5998 Points (39%)
7604 Points (50%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6152 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22786 Points (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
10205 Points (51%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium N4200 → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4000 → 90% n=21

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4005 → 92% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 23. 13:19:55

#0 checking url part for id 8180 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9426 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10044 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8180 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#8 got single benchmarks 8180 +0.057s ... 0.099s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9426 +0.014s ... 0.113s

#10 got single benchmarks 9426 +0.042s ... 0.155s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10044 +0.002s ... 0.157s

#12 got single benchmarks 10044 +0.006s ... 0.163s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.163s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.317s ... 0.48s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.48s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)