Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver J5040 vs Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Pentium Silver N5030

Intel Pentium Silver J5040

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium J5040

The Intel Pentium Silver J5040 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini-PCs and was announced late 2019. It runs at 2 GHz (base) to 3.2 GHz (single core burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform (refresh). Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a better GPU architecture and a partly integrated WiFi support. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

Thanks to the higher clock speed and TDP, the Pentium J5040 is slightly faster than the mobile counterpart, the Pentium Silver N5030. Compare to AMD, it ranks on average slightly higher compared to the Athlon Silver 3050e (Zen based Dual-Core) that wins in single-core tests but looses out in multi-threaded tests. Intel Core i3 from 2019 (like the i3-1005G1) are clearly faster and win even in multi-threaded tests easily although being only dual-core CPUs.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 800 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

The J-variant of the Gemini Lake SoCs are specified at 10W TDP and therefore higher than the mobile N variants (6 Watt).

Intel Celeron N3350

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3350 is an Apollo Lake family, dual-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its two cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.4 GHz; these are not Hyper-Threading-enabled meaning there are no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 500, and eats very little (~6 W).

Amusingly enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Celeron as of late 2022, albeit the price has dropped from about $100 to about $20 per unit making the CPU even more popular with ultra-budget nettop and laptop makers.

Architecture & Features

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Celeron is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products (hello, Raspberry Pi).

The Celeron N3350 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture. This replaces the dated Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements and making for a double-digit IPC improvement. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations.

The Celeron is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Celeron is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N3350 in our database is just as fast as the Atom x5-Z8300 and the Core 2 Duo SU7300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is not fast at all. In fact, the two cores of this Celeron trail behind a single core of any half-decent CPU such as Intel's very own Core i3-7130U. A proper x86 CPU, Celeron N3350 will let you run nearly any Windows app, the caveat being that you will have to wait for several seconds every time you click on something. Windows 10 takes nearly a minute to fully boot with this CPU.

Graphics

The Intel HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is the highlight of this little Celeron. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD Graphics 500 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 2160p60. It will happily decode VP9 and AVC-encoded videos, too. These are the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on, as of 2021.

It's not all roses and sunshine. To keep power consumption under control, the number of Execution Units was reduced to 12 (the HD Graphics 520 has 24 EUs at its disposal, for reference). Besides, the UHD Graphics runs at up to 650 MHz which is not a lot. Very few games will be playable on this graphics solution - mostly, ones that were released in the 2000s or even in the 1990s.

Power consumption

The Celeron's default TDP (also known as the Power Limit 1) is 6 W, making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, makes for a much more responsive user experience, speaking subjectively.

Energy efficiency isn't great here, as Intel's 14 nm processes are very old as of mid 2022.

Intel Pentium Silver N5030

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N5030

The Intel Pentium Silver N5030 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2019. It runs at 1.1-3.1 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. The 5030 is the refresh of the older Pentium 5000 and offers a 400 MHz higher Boost clock. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a better GPU architecture and a partly integrated WiFi support. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N5030 in our database proves unable to beat the AMD 3020e, an entry-level dual-core CPU of similar power efficiency, in multi-thread performance, rendering the Pentium a poor option for anything but the most basic day-to-day activities, as of late 2022.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Pentium has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 6 W. This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs and handhelds.

The Intel Pentium N5030 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes making for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver J5040Intel Celeron N3350Intel Pentium Silver N5030
CodenameGemini Lake RefreshApollo LakeGemini Lake Refresh
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel CeleronIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Refresh
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 « 2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50301.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41252 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N40201.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J34551.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N34501.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J33552 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 « 1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41252 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N40201.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 3200 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz1100 - 3100 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 24 / 4
TDP10 Watt6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1090BGA1296BGA1090
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 605 (18 EUs, 200 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AESDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 605 (250 - 800 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 605 (200 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$24 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N3350
11.2 pt (19%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N5030
16.9 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1634 Points (2%)
328 Points (0%)
911 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
519 Points (22%)
252 Points (11%)
430 Points (18%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
202 Points (22%)
min: 100     avg: 103.5     median: 103.5 (11%)     max: 107 Points
min: 171     avg: 182.5     median: 182.5 (20%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
630 Points (2%)
min: 151     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (0%)     max: 190 Points
min: 360     avg: 425.5     median: 425.5 (1%)     max: 491 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
279 Points (2%)
min: 203     avg: 226     median: 226 (1%)     max: 248.9 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
91 Points (25%)
min: 75.8     avg: 80.9     median: 80.9 (22%)     max: 86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.5 Points (5%)
min: 1.07     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.12 Points
3.1 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.1 Points (26%)
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.6 Points
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2688 Points (16%)
min: 1458     avg: 1570     median: 1490 (9%)     max: 1917 Points
2498 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8279 Points (6%)
min: 1775     avg: 2505     median: 2654 (2%)     max: 2787 Points
7724 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
13248 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
4422 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
516 s (6%)
min: 1225     avg: 1300     median: 1258 (15%)     max: 1418 s
526 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.3 s (3%)
min: 42.2     avg: 46.1     median: 45.5 (9%)     max: 50.6 s
14.7 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1391 Points (2%)
616 Points (1%)
1163 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
8946 MIPS (5%)
min: 2692     avg: 2980     median: 2979.5 (2%)     max: 3267 MIPS
min: 6598     avg: 7238     median: 7238 (4%)     max: 7878 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2833 MIPS (33%)
min: 1653     avg: 1724     median: 1723.5 (20%)     max: 1794 MIPS
min: 2555     avg: 2645     median: 2645 (31%)     max: 2735 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
19.2 fps (6%)
6.2 fps (2%)
17.6 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
89.1 fps (21%)
32.5 fps (7%)
84 fps (19%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.7 fps (3%)
min: 0.63     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.65 fps
0.7 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (5%)
0.7 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
2060 Seconds (15%)
min: 6275     avg: 6276     median: 6276 (44%)     max: 6277 Seconds
min: 3319     avg: 3450     median: 3449.5 (24%)     max: 3580 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.3 sec (29%)
min: 2.21     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (50%)     max: 2.433 sec
min: 1.402     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (31%)     max: 1.473 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4296 Points (9%)
min: 1624     avg: 1655     median: 1654.5 (4%)     max: 1685 Points
3895 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
21.3 s (5%)
min: 27.5     avg: 29.2     median: 27.5 (6%)     max: 32.5 s
24.9 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
47.8 s (2%)
min: 61.2     avg: 64.5     median: 61.2 (3%)     max: 71.1 s
55.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1083 s (5%)
min: 1515     avg: 1532     median: 1538 (7%)     max: 1543 s
1247 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1159     avg: 1294     median: 1333 (3%)     max: 1356 Points
min: 2326     avg: 2377     median: 2377 (6%)     max: 2428 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 11556     avg: 12344     median: 12344 (10%)     max: 13132 Points
23701 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 11665     avg: 12042     median: 12041.5 (10%)     max: 12418 Points
23621 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 10653     avg: 12775     median: 13161.5 (11%)     max: 14698 Points
min: 26682     avg: 31360     median: 31360 (26%)     max: 36038 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 941     avg: 986     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1029 Points
min: 2155     avg: 2183     median: 2182.5 (6%)     max: 2210 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1293     avg: 1412     median: 1412 (3%)     max: 1501 Points
min: 3014     avg: 3209     median: 3209 (6%)     max: 3404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
704 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
2857 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
3123 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
538 Points (21%)
min: 310     avg: 320     median: 320 (13%)     max: 330 Points
min: 431     avg: 491.7     median: 512 (20%)     max: 532 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1672 Points (3%)
min: 591     avg: 606     median: 605.5 (1%)     max: 620 Points
min: 1039     avg: 1263     median: 1221 (2%)     max: 1529 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
535 Points (2%)
309 Points (1%)
356 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1664 Points (5%)
587 Points (2%)
1177 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2333 Points (23%)
min: 1374     avg: 1473     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1529 Points
2176 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6359 Points (6%)
min: 2427     avg: 2599     median: 2619.5 (3%)     max: 2731 Points
5662 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1464     avg: 1491     median: 1500 (17%)     max: 1510 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2529     avg: 2589     median: 2589 (4%)     max: 2648 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2409     avg: 2468     median: 2467.5 (4%)     max: 2526 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1314     avg: 1328     median: 1327.5 (26%)     max: 1341 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1957 ms (2%)
min: 3108     avg: 3519     median: 3443 (4%)     max: 4230 ms
min: 1914     avg: 2410     median: 2170 (3%)     max: 3145 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 255     avg: 370.3     median: 299.2 (3%)     max: 628 ms
355.8 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8457     avg: 9831     median: 9492.5 (7%)     max: 11461 Points
min: 21894     avg: 21899     median: 21899 (17%)     max: 21904 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
80.2 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
108.2 Points (19%)
min: 49.2     avg: 55.4     median: 52.2 (9%)     max: 68 Points
min: 91.3     avg: 100.9     median: 95.4 (17%)     max: 116 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3574 Points (19%)
8984 Points (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
7138 Points (15%)
31170 Points (67%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5377 Points (35%)
9447 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
7007 Points (35%)
13200 Points (66%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
426 Points (16%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.1 Watt (1%)
min: 9.09     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (2%)     max: 10.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.7 Watt (1%)
min: 7.98     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
12.5 Points per Watt (9%)
min: 25.4     avg: 25.7     median: 25.7 (19%)     max: 25.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver J5040 → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3350 → 46% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N5030 → 84% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 19. 09:13:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14651 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8185 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11531 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752909219s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 08:47:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14651 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 14651 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8185 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 8185 +0.021s ... 0.04s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11531 +0.003s ... 0.043s

#13 got single benchmarks 11531 +0.008s ... 0.051s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.065s ... 0.115s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.116s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)