Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y vs Intel Core m3-8100Y

Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 6500Y

The Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y is an energy-efficient, dual-core SoC designed for use in Windows tablets and passively cooled laptops. The Pentium is based on the old Amber Lake architecture that was initially introduced in 2018. The CPU was unveiled in Q1 2021; it is, in fact, not very different from Intel Core m3-8100Y, the only difference between the two being the slightly slower iGPU model (23 EU UHD Graphics 615 vs 24 EU UHD Graphics 615).

The two CPU cores run at 1.1 GHz to 3.4 GHz and are Hyper-Threading-enabled for 4 processing threads in total.

Architecture

Amber Lake family products are not known to have many improvements compared to the previous Kaby Lake and Skylake processors. They all share nearly the same per-MHz performance and nearly the same set of capabilities. Amber Lake processors do, however, have slightly higher clock speeds in comparison to their immediate predecessors.

Pentium 6500Y has a built-in dual-channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 memory controller as well as several PCI-Express 3.0 lanes for connecting graphics cards, SSDs and other devices. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It is supposed to get soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1515 socket interface).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 6500Y as of August 2023, we have tested at least one laptop featuring the Core i3-10100Y, a chip that's just a little faster (Amber Lake, 2 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.9 GHz). Based on that, we expect the 6500Y to trail behind the AMD 3020e and the AMD 3050e just slightly. In other words, this is a very slow chip, as of mid 2023.

Graphics

The Intel UHD Graphics 615 normally has 24 Execution Units at its disposal but, for reason unbeknownst to us, just 23 EUs are active in the case of this Pentium. The graphics adapter is not much different from the HD Graphics 615 as found in 7th Gen Y-class Intel Core processors. As such, it has no support for SUHD 4320p monitors, nor can it HW-decode AV1, the latest video codec. Just the more usual VP9, AVC and HEVC are supported.

The UHD Graphics runs at 300 MHz to 900 MHz. This is not a GPU that a gamer would be happy with; very poor 3D performance is to be expected because of the thermal constraints (both Core m3-8100Y and Pentium 6500Y were created with thin tablets and ultra-thin laptops in mind) as well as the rather low TDP of the SoC. Most games will not be playable even if set to Lowest quality preset at 720p resolution. The least graphically intensive titles, like Farming Simulator 19, will pose no problem for the iGPU, though.

Power consumption

The chip is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for fairly unimpressive, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

The Pentium 6500Y has a default TDP of 5 W (also known as the long-term power limit), half a watt higher than its immediate predecessors; despite the difference, a value this low makes the Pentium more than suitable for use in ultra-thin, passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs. The default TDP can be reduced slightly (with 3.5 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value) or increased (up to 7 W are possible) by laptop makers if needed, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result.

Intel Core m3-8100Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core m3-8100Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and will be announced around August 2018. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.1 - 3.4 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder.  Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core m3-7Y32), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the old 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts (previous generations were 4.5 Watt), and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

ModelIntel Pentium Gold 6500YIntel Core m3-8100Y
SeriesIntel Amber LakeIntel Amber Lake
CodenameAmber Lake-YAmber Lake-Y
Series: Amber Lake Amber Lake-Y
Intel Core i5-10310Y compare1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y compare1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y compare1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y compare1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y compare1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y « 1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310Y compare1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y compare1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y compare1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y compare1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y compare1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y « 1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 3400 MHz1100 - 3400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP5 Watt5 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesDDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
SocketBGA
$281 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - m3-8100Y
20.2 pt (28%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 232     avg: 257.7     median: 243 (27%)     max: 298 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 382     avg: 440.7     median: 413 (1%)     max: 527 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 157     avg: 190.8     median: 179.5 (1%)     max: 247 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 91     avg: 101.3     median: 96.6 (29%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3850 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
6055 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
906 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
18.6 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1646 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 4937     avg: 6246     median: 6245.5 (4%)     max: 7554 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2683     avg: 2983     median: 2982.5 (36%)     max: 3282 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
11.2 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
58.3 fps (13%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.42     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 1.96 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.7 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1893     avg: 2206     median: 2206 (16%)     max: 2519 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.942     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (23%)     max: 1.204 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
29.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
818 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2165     avg: 2747     median: 2579.5 (7%)     max: 3665 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 24135     avg: 26883     median: 26882.5 (22%)     max: 29630 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 20632     avg: 22076     median: 22076 (18%)     max: 23520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18736     avg: 26552     median: 26177 (22%)     max: 34742 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1941     avg: 2084     median: 1968 (5%)     max: 2460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2692     avg: 2986     median: 2837.5 (5%)     max: 3577 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 943     avg: 1061     median: 992 (4%)     max: 1248 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 809     avg: 846     median: 845.5 (36%)     max: 882 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1178     avg: 1397     median: 1396.5 (3%)     max: 1615 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
765 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1279 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3647 Points (36%)
4159 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5963 Points (7%)
6934 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4043 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6676 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5446 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2702 Points (53%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5958 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3081 Points (46%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8823 Points (71%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6189 Points (56%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5047 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6364 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6113 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1295     avg: 1652     median: 1715 (2%)     max: 2163 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 117.4     avg: 211     median: 211 (2%)     max: 304.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 14701     avg: 21429     median: 20267 (18%)     max: 29318 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 128     avg: 134.5     median: 135.5 (28%)     max: 139 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5961 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
25599 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9760 Points (64%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13598 Points (68%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core m3-8100Y → 115% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 19:24:05

#0 checking url part for id 13829 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10086 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13829 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#7 got single benchmarks 13829 +0.006s ... 0.038s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10086 +0.016s ... 0.054s

#9 got single benchmarks 10086 +0.02s ... 0.075s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.146s ... 0.22s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.242s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)