Notebookcheck Logo

AMD PRO A12-9800B vs AMD PRO A12-9830B vs AMD A10-9600P

AMD PRO A12-9800B

► remove from comparison AMD PRO A12-9800B

The AMD PRO A12-9800B is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. It is the business version of the AMD FX-9800P and features the same specifications. The PRO A12-9800B is (together with the FX-9800P) the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 15-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-Watt A12-8800B / FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The ULV chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the A12-9800B is slightly ahead of the old 15-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with a Intel Core i3-6100U (Skylake, 15 Watts). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9800B with 12-15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the APU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

AMD PRO A12-9830B

► remove from comparison AMD PRO A12-9830B

The AMD PRO A12-9830B is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. It is the business variant of the FX-9830P. The A12-9830B / FX-9830P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 45-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-35-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2400 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the A12-9830B is slightly ahead of the old 35-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with the entry-level dual-cores from Intel (Skylake and Kaby Lake). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz (compared to 758 MHz for FX-9800P/A12-9800B). Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9830B with 25-45 Watts, which is comparable to Intel quad-core processors from the H-series. This means the APU is a good choice for big and heavy notebooks with at least 15 inches.

AMD A10-9600P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-9600P

The AMD A10-9600P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz. It was announced in mid 2016 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9600P is slightly faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. Therefore, the CPU performance is similar to a Broadwell 15 Watt Core i3 like The i3-5010U. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

ModelAMD PRO A12-9800BAMD PRO A12-9830BAMD A10-9600P
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameBristol RidgeBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
» AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
» AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
Clock2700 - 3600 MHz3000 - 3700 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt25-45 Watt15 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C90 °C
SocketFP4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Bristol Ridge PRO A12-9800BAMD Bristol Ridge PRO A12-9830BAMD Bristol Ridge A10-9600P

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 222     avg: 225.3     median: 225 (2%)     max: 229 Points
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
min: 195     avg: 211     median: 216 (2%)     max: 217 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 75     avg: 75.7     median: 75 (26%)     max: 77 Points
min: 70     avg: 74.8     median: 76 (26%)     max: 77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.47     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (5%)     max: 2.7 Points
min: 2.59     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (5%)     max: 2.6 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.86     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (3%)     max: 0.9 Points
min: 0.87     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (3%)     max: 0.9 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2564     avg: 2593     median: 2592.5 (23%)     max: 2621 Points
min: 2340     avg: 2439     median: 2447 (22%)     max: 2520 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6854     avg: 7056     median: 7055.5 (10%)     max: 7257 Points
min: 5913     avg: 6467     median: 6508 (9%)     max: 6939 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10237 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3499 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
475.7 s (6%)
534 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
13.8 s (3%)
15.3 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1383 Points (8%)
1526 Points (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16.5 fps (7%)
16.3 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
77 fps (21%)
85.4 fps (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (8%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (7%)
0.3 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (7%)
1.5 GB/s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3249 Points (7%)
min: 2969     avg: 3224     median: 3287 (7%)     max: 3352 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.6 s (4%)
18.7 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.1 s (2%)
41.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
908 s (4%)
942 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 7115     avg: 7516     median: 7515.5 (8%)     max: 7916 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2232     avg: 2318     median: 2275 (8%)     max: 2448 Points
min: 2246     avg: 2418     median: 2387 (8%)     max: 2634 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 24353     avg: 25657     median: 25657 (16%)     max: 26961 Points
min: 21570     avg: 23140     median: 23093 (15%)     max: 24803 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 25150     avg: 25871     median: 25871 (21%)     max: 26592 Points
min: 18940     avg: 21504     median: 21065.5 (17%)     max: 24944 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 27021     avg: 27778     median: 27778 (23%)     max: 28535 Points
min: 22601     avg: 25235     median: 26061 (22%)     max: 26217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1989     avg: 2038     median: 2035 (5%)     max: 2089 Points
min: 1722     avg: 2000     median: 2031.5 (5%)     max: 2214 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2739     avg: 2999     median: 3007 (7%)     max: 3251 Points
min: 2455     avg: 2912     median: 2981 (7%)     max: 3229 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 437     avg: 439     median: 439 (2%)     max: 441 Points
1045 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2073 Points (32%)
2047 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4453 Points (11%)
4711 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5326 Points (9%)
min: 5252     avg: 5386     median: 5423 (10%)     max: 5445 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2031 Points (40%)
min: 2000     avg: 2064     median: 2074 (41%)     max: 2109 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5575 Points (9%)
5702 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2109 Points (35%)
2237 Points (37%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3270 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2974 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
7151 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6518 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5705 Points (15%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2152     avg: 2225     median: 2159 (3%)     max: 2363 ms
min: 2098     avg: 2251     median: 2328 (3%)     max: 2328 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
170.4 ms (2%)
min: 133.3     avg: 138.2     median: 133.3 (1%)     max: 148.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 16552     avg: 17731     median: 18206 (19%)     max: 18435 Points
min: 18921     avg: 19501     median: 19791 (20%)     max: 19791 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD PRO A12-9800B → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-9600P → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 14. 01:45:51

#0 checking url part for id 8544 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8550 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8094 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.015s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.016s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#24 composed specs +0s ... 0.016s

#25 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 8544 +0s ... 0.017s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#29 got single benchmarks 8544 +0.01s ... 0.027s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 8550 +0s ... 0.027s

#31 got single benchmarks 8550 +0s ... 0.028s

#32 getting avg benchmarks for device 8094 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#35 got single benchmarks 8094 +0.014s ... 0.044s

#36 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.015s ... 0.059s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.059s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.064s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.065s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#147 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#148 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#158 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#164 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#167 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#170 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#181 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#184 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#191 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#193 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.089s

#194 return log +0s ... 0.089s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)