Notebookcheck Logo

AMD PRO A12-9800B vs AMD A10-9620P vs AMD A12-9720P

AMD PRO A12-9800B

► remove from comparison AMD PRO A12-9800B

The AMD PRO A12-9800B is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. It is the business version of the AMD FX-9800P and features the same specifications. The PRO A12-9800B is (together with the FX-9800P) the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 15-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-Watt A12-8800B / FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The ULV chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the A12-9800B is slightly ahead of the old 15-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with a Intel Core i3-6100U (Skylake, 15 Watts). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9800B with 12-15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the APU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

AMD A10-9620P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-9620P

The AMD A10-9620P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.5 - 3.4 GHz. In our tests the A10-9620P even hit 3.6 GHz.

It was announced in 2017 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-18600 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9620P is a bit faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

AMD A12-9720P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9720P

The AMD A12-9720P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was introduced in 2017. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts, not verified) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.7 - 3.8 GHz (4.05 GHz for single core were briefly achievable in our test sample), a Radeon R7 iGPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The performance of the A12-9720P should be slightly faster than the A12-9700P (the latter is notable for its slightly slower clock rates). Compared to Intel CPUs, the CPU is most comparable to Skylake Core i3 CPUs. Our first test sample however performed a bit worse than an average A12-9700P and on par with a i3-5010U (multi-core) and i3-4010U (single-core). Due to the TDP limitation, the performance of the A12-9720P will drop significantly under sustained workloads.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAM, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings.

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9720P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelAMD PRO A12-9800BAMD A10-9620PAMD A12-9720P
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameBristol RidgeBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
» AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4
Clock2700 - 3600 MHz2500 - 3400 MHz2700 - 3600 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C90 °C
SocketFP4FP4FP4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Bristol Ridge PRO A12-9800B

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 222     avg: 225.3     median: 225 (2%)     max: 229 Points
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
230 Points (2%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
min: 229     avg: 234.5     median: 234.5 (2%)     max: 240 Points
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 75     avg: 75.7     median: 75 (26%)     max: 77 Points
72 Points (25%)
min: 69     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (25%)     max: 76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.47     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (5%)     max: 2.7 Points
2.7 Points (5%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (5%)     max: 2.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.86     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (3%)     max: 0.9 Points
0.8 Points (3%)
min: 0.93     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (3%)     max: 0.94 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2564     avg: 2593     median: 2592.5 (23%)     max: 2621 Points
2277 Points (20%)
min: 2640     avg: 2743     median: 2743 (24%)     max: 2846 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6854     avg: 7056     median: 7055.5 (10%)     max: 7257 Points
7420 Points (10%)
min: 7200     avg: 7361     median: 7361 (10%)     max: 7522 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10237 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3499 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
475.7 s (6%)
470.9 s (6%)
415.5 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
13.8 s (3%)
14.4 s (3%)
13 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1383 Points (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16.5 fps (7%)
16.3 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
77 fps (21%)
76.6 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (8%)
0.2 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (7%)
0.4 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (7%)
1.8 GB/s (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3249 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.6 s (4%)
18.2 s (4%)
min: 17.77     avg: 19.6     median: 19.6 (4%)     max: 21.4 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.1 s (2%)
40.3 s (2%)
min: 39.77     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (2%)     max: 48.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
908 s (4%)
977 s (4%)
min: 864     avg: 902     median: 901.5 (4%)     max: 939 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2232     avg: 2318     median: 2275 (8%)     max: 2448 Points
2399 Points (8%)
2761 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 24353     avg: 25657     median: 25657 (16%)     max: 26961 Points
22553 Points (15%)
25648 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 25150     avg: 25871     median: 25871 (21%)     max: 26592 Points
24032 Points (20%)
24747 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 27021     avg: 27778     median: 27778 (23%)     max: 28535 Points
min: 24457     avg: 27079     median: 27079 (23%)     max: 29701 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1989     avg: 2038     median: 2035 (5%)     max: 2089 Points
2338 Points (6%)
min: 2258     avg: 2330     median: 2329.5 (6%)     max: 2401 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2739     avg: 2999     median: 3007 (7%)     max: 3251 Points
3175 Points (8%)
min: 3179     avg: 3265     median: 3264.5 (8%)     max: 3350 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 437     avg: 439     median: 439 (2%)     max: 441 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2073 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4453 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5326 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2031 Points (40%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5575 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2109 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3270 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2974 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
7151 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6518 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5705 Points (15%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2152     avg: 2225     median: 2159 (3%)     max: 2363 ms
2422 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
170.4 ms (2%)
min: 146.6     avg: 192.1     median: 192.1 (2%)     max: 237.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 16552     avg: 17731     median: 18206 (19%)     max: 18435 Points
min: 14783     avg: 16961     median: 16960.5 (18%)     max: 19138 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD PRO A12-9800B → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-9620P → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9720P → 104% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 09. 04:22:20

#0 checking url part for id 8544 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9188 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9192 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.013s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.017s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#24 composed specs +0s ... 0.017s

#25 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 8544 +0s ... 0.017s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#29 got single benchmarks 8544 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 9188 +0s ... 0.026s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#32 got single benchmarks 9188 +0.006s ... 0.032s

#33 getting avg benchmarks for device 9192 +0s ... 0.032s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#35 got single benchmarks 9192 +0.007s ... 0.04s

#36 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.021s ... 0.061s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#151 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.09s

#152 return log +0s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)