Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 3700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 7 3700U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U should be slightly ahead the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is an eight-core desktop processor that can handle sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 7 2700 is the second fastest Ryzen 7 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 7 2700 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 50% more efficient than the 105 W TDP Ryzen 7 2700 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 4.1 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 7 2700X. The Ryzen 7 2700 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 7 2700's eight cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has good performance in games. However, if it is operating at a lower base clock because of low TDP, then the Ryzen 7 2700 falls behind the Ryzen 5 2600 in gaming benchmarks. This behaviour could be because many games currently lack multi-core support. Hence, games rely more on clock speed more than core count.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 7 2700.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700UAMD Ryzen 7 2700
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Ryzen 7
CodenameZen+Zen+
Series: Ryzen 7 Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X compare3.7 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 « 3.2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock2300 - 4000 MHz3200 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 16
TDP15 Watt65 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4940 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
SocketAM4AM4 (1331)
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
Die Size213 mm2
$299 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
658 Points (4%)
1551 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
149 Points (45%)
161 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 2700 +
16.7 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 2700 +
1.8 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
4505 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
31385 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
49441 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
7756 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
130.5 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
5.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 R7 2700 +
4440 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
16735 MIPS (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3680 MIPS (44%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 R7 2700 +
89.7 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 R7 2700 +
195.7 fps (45%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
3.6 fps (6%)
9.5 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 R7 2700 +
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 R7 2700 +
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 R7 2700 +
9 GB/s (23%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
785 Seconds (6%)
308.3 Seconds (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 R7 2700 +
9475 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
11.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
24.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
597 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 R7 2700 +
51796 Points (45%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6539 Points (18%)
13959 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 R7 2700 +
64158 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 R7 2700 +
64932 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 R7 2700 +
66419 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2098 Points (5%)
12224 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
9338 Points (17%)
17915 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2706 Points (11%)
8049 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
808 Points (34%)
1000 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3018 Points (5%)
6560 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
839 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3091 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3928 Points (39%)
4681 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
11249 Points (13%)
22776 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1278 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
27979 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
140.9 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
143.2 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R7 2700 +
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700 → 222% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 18:48:59

#0 checking url part for id 11332 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10030 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11332 +0.003s ... 0.027s

#7 got single benchmarks 11332 +0.008s ... 0.035s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10030 +0.003s ... 0.038s

#9 got single benchmarks 10030 +0.009s ... 0.046s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.179s ... 0.225s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.249s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)