AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

► remove

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April  2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 5 3500U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Including the 35 Watt TDP, the 3750H should be a capable upper mid-range processor for laptops, including gaming laptops.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500UAMD Ryzen 7 3750H
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Zen+Zen+
: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U (compare)2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U (compare)2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (compare)2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U (compare)2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz2 / 24 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 3750H2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U (compare)2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U (compare)2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (compare)2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U (compare)2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz2 / 24 MB
2100 - 3700 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
384 KB384 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 MB4 MB
4 / 84 / 8
15 35
4500 4500
12 12
AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R5 PRO 3500U

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
40.1 pt (44%)
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Single Core)
369 Points (72%)
min: 340     avg: 359     median: 352 (68%)     max: 386 Points
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Multi Core)
1349 Points (15%)
min: 1633     avg: 1750     median: 1793 (20%)     max: 1825 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
611 Points (14%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620Tooltip
min: 672     avg: 753     median: 757 (17%)     max: 805 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
144 Points (66%)
min: 135     avg: 144     median: 143.5 (66%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
9.2 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
1.6 Points (67%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (49%)     max: 4898 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (35%)     max: 20750 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
197 seconds (2%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
7.4 seconds (1%)
WinRAR - Result
2866 KB/s (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4
16531 MIPS (18%)
min: 18689     avg: 18938     median: 18938 (20%)     max: 19187 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
3516 MIPS (23%)
min: 3511     avg: 3585     median: 3585 (24%)     max: 3659 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
48.6 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
139 fps (49%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
3.6 fps (13%)
010Tooltip
min: 4.352     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (16%)     max: 4.4 fps
010Tooltip
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.5 GB/s (25%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.7 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
5 GB/s (26%)
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU *
786 Seconds (6%)
min: 584.19     avg: 609     median: 608.6 (4%)     max: 633 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (50%)     max: 8812 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.7 Seconds (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
650 Seconds (3%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
25143 Points (35%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
6412 points (31%)
min: 6606     avg: 7734     median: 7941 (39%)     max: 8648 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
43514 Points (28%)
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (31%)     max: 57479 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (61%)     max: 56661 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (64%)     max: 63731 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
6090 Points (15%)
min: 5698     avg: 7502     median: 7786.5 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
9070 Points (31%)
min: 10737     avg: 11312     median: 11370.5 (39%)     max: 11900 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (77%)     max: 3819 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
3820 Points (60%)
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (66%)     max: 4186 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
10419 Points (18%)
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (23%)     max: 13738 Points
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (66%)     max: 959 Points
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (22%)     max: 3718 Points
Geekbench 5.1 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
874 Points (65%)
Geekbench 5.1 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
3537 Points (46%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
1325 ms (2%)
min: 1157.6     avg: 1182     median: 1161.5 (2%)     max: 1227.7 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
27689 Points (53%)
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (58%)     max: 30714 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 V28,10 Stress Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
min: 95     avg: 139     median: 138.5 (37%)     max: 182 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
min: 66.4     avg: 81.8     median: 81.8 (22%)     max: 97.1 Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 105%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.11
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)