AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

► remove

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April  2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 5 3500U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a mobile Dual-Core-SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen+ cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.6 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Ryzen 3 3200U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3200U should be faster than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500UAMD Ryzen 3 3200U
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Zen+Zen+
: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U (compare)2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U (compare)2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U (compare)2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz2 / 24 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U (compare)2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U (compare)2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 3200U2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U (compare)2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz2 / 24 MB
2100 - 3700 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz
384 KB192 KB
2 MB1 MB
4 MB4 MB
4 / 82 / 4
15 15
4500 4500
12 12
AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R5 PRO 3500U

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
40.1 pt (44%)
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Single Core)
369 Points (72%)
274 Points (53%)
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Multi Core)
1349 Points (15%)
453 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
611 Points (14%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620Tooltip
318 Points (7%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
144 Points (66%)
130 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
4258 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9284 Points (16%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
484 seconds (6%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
14 seconds (3%)
WinRAR - Result
1613 KB/s (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4
16531 MIPS (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
3516 MIPS (23%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
19.5 fps (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
97.8 fps (35%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
3.6 fps (13%)
010Tooltip
1.9 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.4 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
2.2 GB/s (11%)
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU *
786 Seconds (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
3755 Points (25%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.5 Seconds (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
29 Seconds (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
730 Seconds (3%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
6412 points (31%)
3835 points (19%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
43514 Points (28%)
41939 Points (27%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
42486 Points (51%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
49505 Points (57%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
6090 Points (15%)
3329 Points (8%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
9070 Points (31%)
4947 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
7535 Points (61%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
5586 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
9447 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
7540 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
7816 Points (20%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
6922 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
3282 Points (67%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
7496 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
3673 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
3626 Points (57%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
7237 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
3820 Points (60%)
3758 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
10419 Points (18%)
7733 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
830 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
1769 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
1325 ms (2%)
1374 ms (2%)
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
130 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
27689 Points (53%)
23991 Points (46%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 91%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.11
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)