AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

► remove AMD PRO 2700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2017. Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 2700U, the PRO versions offer additional security features. It combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. The TDP can be configured by the laptop manufacturer between 12 to 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal) and therefore the APU is also suited for thin and light laptops. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance of the Zen CPU cores should be better than a high end Kaby-Lake-Refresh Quad-Core CPU (e.g. the Core i7-8650U) according to AMD. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is suited for all applications.

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

► remove AMD 2800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 2800H is a mobile SoC that was announced late 2018. It is intended for mid-sized to big laptops and combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 3.3 (base) - 3.8 GHz (boost) with a Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders). The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-3200 memory.

Compared to the older Ryzen 7 2700U for slim and light laptops, the 2800H offers a higher TDP (45 Watt versus 15 Watt), higher clocked memory, a higher base clock (3.4 versus 2.2 GHz), and a faster integrated GPU.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance should be slightly better than the Ryzen 7 2700U due to the higher TDP and base clock speed. Especially longer loads should profit from this. Due to the high TDP (configurable from 35 - 54 Watt), the Ryzen 7 2800H is best suited for bigger laptops.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700UAMD Ryzen 7 2800H
AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
ZenZen
: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G (compare)3600 - 3900 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H3300 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U (compare)2200 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2200 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H (compare)3200 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G (compare)3500 - 3700 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U (compare)2000 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (compare)2000 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U (compare)2000 - 3400 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U (compare)2000 - 3400 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U (compare)2500 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U (compare)2500 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U (compare)2400 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G (compare)3600 - 3900 MHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 2800H3300 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U (compare)2200 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2200 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H (compare)3200 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G (compare)3500 - 3700 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U (compare)2000 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (compare)2000 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U (compare)2000 - 3400 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U (compare)2000 - 3400 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U (compare)2500 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U (compare)2500 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U (compare)2400 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
2200 - 3800 MHz3300 - 3800 MHz
384 KB384 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 MB4 MB
4 / 84 / 8
15 35
4500 4500
14 14
AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz)
AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) PRO 2700U

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.9
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)