Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700X vs AMD Athlon 300U

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 2700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2017. Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 2700U, the PRO versions offer additional security features. It combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. The TDP can be configured by the laptop manufacturer between 12 to 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal) and therefore the APU is also suited for thin and light laptops. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance of the Zen CPU cores should be better than a high end Kaby-Lake-Refresh Quad-Core CPU (e.g. the Core i7-8650U) according to AMD. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is suited for all applications.

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 1700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is a fast desktop processor with 8 cores and SMT (16 threads) that was introduced in early 2017. It is based on the new Zen architecture and it is the second fastest model at the time of announcement.

The CPU cores clock from 3.4 base speed up to 3.9 GHz (XFR). The 2-core Turbo is specified at 3.8 GHz and using all 8 cores, the CPU can reach up to 3.5 GHz. Therefore, the CPU offers 200 MHz less than the Ryzen 7 1800X at the same TDP.

The performance in applications that can make use of all 8 cores is very competitive to high end Intel CPUs at a very good price point. However, non optimized apps like many games can't make full use of the new architecture.

A detailed look at the new Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X and 1700 can be found in our review (upcoming).

AMD Athlon 300U

► remove from comparison

The AMD Athlon 300U is a mobile entry level dual core SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. It is quite similar to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (2.6 - 3.5 GHz).

Compared to the Picasso APUs of the Ryzen 3000 series, the Athlon 300U is still based on the first generation of the 2000 series. Only the PRO variant is based on the new Zen+ microarchitecture that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvement.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Athlon 300U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

Performance wise, the Athlon 300 should be slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700UAMD Ryzen 7 1700XAMD Athlon 300U
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Ryzen 7AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameZenZenZen
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U « 2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X3.6 - 4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X « 3.4 - 3.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 17003 - 3.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2200 - 3800 MHz3400 - 3800 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 162 / 4
TDP15 Watt95 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4800 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm12 nm
SocketAM4AM4AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
$399 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
335 Points (37%)
308 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3280 Points (8%)
637 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1537     avg: 1544     median: 1537 (10%)     max: 1557 Points
308 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 152     avg: 154.3     median: 154 (46%)     max: 157 Points
119 Points (36%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 16.7     avg: 17     median: 17 (22%)     max: 17.2 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.72     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (43%)     max: 1.74 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4662 Points (28%)
3968 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31950 Points (23%)
8724 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 109     avg: 109.4     median: 109.4 (1%)     max: 109.8 s
510 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (1%)     max: 5.77 s
15.4 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3457     avg: 3728     median: 3728 (6%)     max: 3999 Points
1623 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
39624 MIPS (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3746 MIPS (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 89.5     avg: 90.1     median: 90.1 (31%)     max: 90.6 fps
18.5 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 174     avg: 180     median: 180 (42%)     max: 186 fps
88.6 fps (20%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.9 fps (16%)
1.8 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.892     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 0.898 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.6     avg: 9     median: 9 (23%)     max: 9.3 GB/s
1.9 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
327.1 Seconds (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9027     avg: 9076     median: 9076 (19%)     max: 9125 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.8 s (2%)
14.1 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
23.7 s (1%)
31.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
576 s (3%)
807 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3427 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41974 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41029 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
45359 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3217 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18407 Points (33%)
4729 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7806 Points (33%)
1361 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
882 Points (37%)
932 Points (39%)
867 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3183 Points (6%)
6275 Points (11%)
1840 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
765 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1552 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4277 Points (43%)
3287 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
24555 Points (27%)
6053 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4035     avg: 4184     median: 4184 (57%)     max: 4333 Points
3213 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19550     avg: 20294     median: 20294 (49%)     max: 21038 Points
5763 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
28135 Points (44%)
6471 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4004 Points (60%)
3196 Points (48%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6134 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2919 Points (57%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8730 Points (70%)
4852 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
7294 Points (66%)
4449 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
26601 Points (52%)
9250 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
22628 Points (46%)
6447 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 19561     avg: 19631     median: 19631 (51%)     max: 19701 Points
6868 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1452 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
133.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
22253 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
143 Points (30%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
169 Watt (29%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
165 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.3 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 1700X → 151% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon 300U → 78% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 01:53:56

#0 checking url part for id 10132 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8512 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11201 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10132 +0.003s ... 0.038s

#8 got single benchmarks 10132 +0.007s ... 0.045s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8512 +0.003s ... 0.048s

#10 got single benchmarks 8512 +0.011s ... 0.059s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11201 +0.003s ... 0.062s

#12 got single benchmarks 11201 +0.011s ... 0.073s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.296s ... 0.369s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.369s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)