The Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). It is the fastest Core 2 Duo P-model and the performance is comparable to the Core 2 Duo T9600. Still the TDP rating is considerably better (28 versus 35 Watt).
Due to the high clock speed, the P9700 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The P9700 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo P9700 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 is an entry to mid-range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn architecture, but features only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz. Compared to the similar T6670, the T6600 does not feature Virtualization features in hardware and is speced at a lower maximum temperature.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6600.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 → NAN%n=
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 → NAN%n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 30. 06:56:41
#0 checking url part for id 476 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 468 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 485 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:33 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 476 +0.002s ... 0.031s
#8 got single benchmarks 476 +0.012s ... 0.043s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 468 +0.002s ... 0.044s
#10 got single benchmarks 468 +0s ... 0.045s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 485 +0.002s ... 0.046s
#12 got single benchmarks 485 +0.05s ... 0.097s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.061s ... 0.158s