Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

Intel Core 2 Duo P9500

► remove from comparison Intel P9500

The Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo T9400 except for the lower TDP of 25 versus 35 Watt).

Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the P9500 offers enough performance for most demanding games (in 2009) and applications.

The P9500 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).

Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

► remove from comparison Intel T9550

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 was the middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9600 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt.

Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9550 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. 

The T9550 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P9500Intel Core 2 Duo T9550
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2530 MHz2660 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.05-1.212V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization, Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep (up to C6), ExBit, SSE4.1
Architecturex86x86
$348 U.S.$316 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P9500Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2758     avg: 2944     median: 2901 (26%)     max: 3234 Points
min: 2911     avg: 2958     median: 2966 (26%)     max: 3001 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5245     avg: 5607     median: 5501.5 (8%)     max: 6104 Points
min: 5418     avg: 5530     median: 5577 (8%)     max: 5615 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
30.5 s (6%)
29 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9550 +
922 s (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1687     avg: 2198     median: 2311 (5%)     max: 2350 Points
min: 2347     avg: 2384     median: 2385 (5%)     max: 2417 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17.67     avg: 18     median: 18 (4%)     max: 18.31 s
min: 16     avg: 17     median: 17 (4%)     max: 17.91 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 42.49     avg: 43.2     median: 43.2 (2%)     max: 43.91 s
min: 40     avg: 41.6     median: 42 (2%)     max: 42.84 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1101 s (5%)
min: 1059     avg: 1105     median: 1123 (5%)     max: 1132 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23667 MIPS (11%)
min: 6820     avg: 17433     median: 20774 (10%)     max: 24706 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
17820 MFLOPS (14%)
min: 5870     avg: 14981     median: 19516 (15%)     max: 19556 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4598     avg: 6203     median: 6250 (39%)     max: 7387 Points
min: 6414     avg: 6553     median: 6619 (42%)     max: 6625 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.4 Points (77%)
min: 3.9     avg: 5.1     median: 5.5 (79%)     max: 5.5 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5060     avg: 5142     median: 5157 (5%)     max: 5210 Points
min: 5252     avg: 5399     median: 5424 (6%)     max: 5496 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 → 101% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 08. 03:02:46

#0 checking url part for id 405 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 449 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 405 +0s ... 0.007s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#47 got single benchmarks 405 +0.019s ... 0.027s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 449 +0s ... 0.027s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#50 got single benchmarks 449 +0.015s ... 0.042s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.043s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#131 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.051s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#133 return log +0.004s ... 0.055s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)