Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Phenom II X4 P940 vs AMD Phenom II X4 N970 vs AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE

AMD Phenom II X4 P940

► remove from comparison

The AMD Phenom II X4 P940 is a slow clocked quad-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the desktop Phenom II, the mobile Phenom II X4 offer no level 3 cache and are therefore compareable to the desktop Athlon X4 line. The slow clock speed allows the low powerconsumption (25 W TDP) but may lead to a bad performance in single threaded applications and games. The single thread performance should be between a 1.4 GHz and 1.7 GHz Core 2 Duo processor. If all four cores are used in benchmarks, the performance may reach the level of a Core i3 processor.

As the current Intel Core i3 CPUs, the P940 offers an integrated DDR3 memory controller (up to DDR3-1066). However it is still manufactured in 45nm (SOI process).

AMD Phenom II X4 N970

► remove from comparison

The AMD Phenom II X4 N970 Quad Core is a laptop CPU clocked at 2.2 GHz. Due to a missing Turbo and no level 3 cache, the performance of the N970 should be between a Core i3-330M and a Core 2 Quad Q9000. Compared to desktop CPUs, the Phenom II laptop CPUs are similar to the desktop Athlon II processors because of the missing level 3 cache. Therefore, the N970 is similar to a low clocked Athlon II X4 CPU produced in 45nm SOI.

The Phenom II includes an integrated memory controller for DDR3 (max. 1333) main memory. It supports MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A.

AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE

► remove from comparison

The AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE (Black Edition) Quad Core was the fastest version of the Phenom II X4 for laptops in Q2 2010 and features an unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking. It was later replaced by the 100 MHz higher clocked X940 BE. With 45W TDP the AMD CPU needs as much power as the Core i7 quad cores but due to the missing level 3 cache, the performance should be worse. Compared to the desktop CPUs, the mobile Phenom II X4 is similar to a Athlon II X4 and produced in 45nm SOI.

The performance of the X920 differs from benchmark to benchmark. If only one core is used, the AMD quad core processor is only on par with a slow 2 GHz Core 2 Duo (e.g. Cinebench R10 Single). The old single threaded SuperPi benchmark is traditionally for AMD even worst on a level of a 1.4 GHz Core 2 Duo. However, if all four cores are used, the performance scores are in regions of the fast dual cores Core i5-540M to i7-640M (Cinebench R10 Multi, wPrieme 2, CB 11.5). The slowest Core i7 quad core (720QM) is still in every benchmark faster than the AMD CPU.

The Phenom II includes an integrated memory controller for DDR3 (max. 1333) main memory. It supports MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A.

ModelAMD Phenom II X4 P940AMD Phenom II X4 N970AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE
SeriesAMD Phenom II X4AMD Phenom II X4AMD Phenom II X4
CodenameChamplainChamplainChamplain
Series: Phenom II X4 Champlain
AMD Phenom II X4 X940 BE2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 N9702.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 N9502.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 N9302 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 P9601.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 P940 « 1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 P9201.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 X940 BE2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 N970 « 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 N9502.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 N9302 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 P9601.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 P9401.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 P9201.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 X940 BE2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE « 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 N9702.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 N9502.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 N9302 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 P9601.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 P9401.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Phenom II X4 P9201.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock1700 MHz2200 MHz2300 MHz
FSB360036003600
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP25 Watt35 Watt45 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm45 nm
SocketS1 (S1g4)S1S1
FeaturesMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, integrated DDR3-1066 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0integrated DDR3-1333 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplier
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N970 +
2.5 Points (3%)
104%
1 X920 BE +
min: 2.6     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.62 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N970 +
1861 Points (11%)
104%
1 X920 BE +
min: 1878     avg: 1940     median: 1935 (12%)     max: 2008 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N970 +
min: 6795     avg: 6811     median: 6810.5 (5%)     max: 6826 Points
104%
1 X920 BE +
min: 6900     avg: 7048     median: 7082 (5%)     max: 7161 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N970 +
8347 Points (6%)
101%
1 X920 BE +
min: 8276     avg: 8391     median: 8390.5 (6%)     max: 8505 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N970 +
2327 Points (3%)
102%
1 X920 BE +
min: 2362     avg: 2379     median: 2379 (3%)     max: 2396 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N970 +
min: 543     avg: 549     median: 548.5 (6%)     max: 554 s
100%
1 X920 BE +
min: 528     avg: 540     median: 540 (6%)     max: 552 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N970 +
17.8 s (4%)
100%
1 X920 BE +
min: 16.66     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (4%)     max: 18.33 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 X920 BE +
17.1 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N970 +
min: 3039     avg: 3043     median: 3042.5 (6%)     max: 3046 Points
104%
1 X920 BE +
min: 3118     avg: 3241     median: 3164 (7%)     max: 3442 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N970 +
min: 34.7     avg: 35     median: 35 (8%)     max: 35.3 s
100%
1 X920 BE +
min: 24.7     avg: 30.5     median: 33 (7%)     max: 33.74 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N970 +
min: 79.6     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (3%)     max: 80.9 s
100%
1 X920 BE +
min: 76     avg: 76.7     median: 76.7 (3%)     max: 77.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N970 +
1883 s (8%)
100%
1 X920 BE +
1793 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N970 +
32130 MIPS (15%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N970 +
25330 MFLOPS (19%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 X920 BE +
4683 Points (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 N970 +
6.9 Points (88%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N970 +
7282 Points (6%)
105%
1 X920 BE +
7671 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N970 +
1940 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Phenom II X4 N970 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 29. 02:40:39

#0 checking url part for id 1296 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1551 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 890 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1296 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#8 got single benchmarks 1296 +0s ... 0.037s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1551 +0.003s ... 0.04s

#10 got single benchmarks 1551 +0.012s ... 0.052s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 890 +0.003s ... 0.055s

#12 got single benchmarks 890 +0.016s ... 0.071s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.123s ... 0.194s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.194s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)