Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.26 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. It is an OEM CPU and similar to the Core 2 Duo P8400 (additional Trusted Execution Technology, and VT-x) and Core 2 Duo P7570.

The performance of the P7550 is on par with the fast Turion II Ultra with about 2.4 to 2.6 GHz. Modern demanding games like Supreme Commander may be limited by the CPU performance. High end gamers should choose a higher clocked Core 2 Duo (or Core i5 / i7).

The P7550 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

► remove from comparison Intel T9800

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 was the top dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. Later it was topped by the Core 2 Duo T9900 / X9100. Still the T9800 is a high end laptop CPU which is well suited for single and dual threaded applications.

Due to the high clock speed, the T9800 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. On average, only faster dual cores (like the T9900 or fast Core i7) or Core i7 quad cores can be faster than the T9800.

The T9800 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo T9800 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins: Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 « 2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 « 2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2260 MHz2920 MHz
FSB10661066
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm, 1-1.25 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBitVirtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
$530 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
Errors [Close]

#0 Stopped to cacheFillTable as currently in progress (1 sys_registry entries found) +0s ... 0.005s

#1 sys_registry tx_nbc2fe_gpusingle_2 entry uid:586042 from 2024.04.22 05:40 +0s ... 0.005s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2439> for benchmark 22, setting:36 +0s ... 0.059s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3633> for benchmark 22, setting:36 +0s ... 0.061s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4645> for benchmark 22, setting:37 +0s ... 0.062s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6839> for benchmark 22, setting:37 +0s ... 0.063s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1112> for benchmark 50, setting:204 +0s ... 0.064s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 35.6> for benchmark 50, setting:203 +0s ... 0.065s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2004> for benchmark 5, setting:2245 +0s ... 0.066s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2626> for benchmark 5, setting:2245 +0s ... 0.067s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 22.7> for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.068s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 15> for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.069s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 53.6> for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.07s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 38> for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.071s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1278> for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.072s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1008> for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.073s

#16 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 17680> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.074s

#17 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 26991> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.075s

#18 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 16630> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.076s

#19 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 20305> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.077s

#20 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4946> for benchmark 16, setting:19 +0s ... 0.078s

#21 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6618> for benchmark 16, setting:19 +0s ... 0.079s

#22 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5.7> for benchmark 20, setting:114 +0s ... 0.08s

#23 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5802> for benchmark 37, setting:155 +0s ... 0.081s

log 23. 02:49:28

#0 checking url part for id 525 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 448 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 will recreate cache as older than 5 days: 1713833368s = 19836.034351852d, id:gpuID:525 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 table tx_nbc2_benchcache_cpu already found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 About to fill cache table +0s ... 0.004s

#6 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.031s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 525 +0.002s ... 0.034s

#9 got single benchmarks 525 +0.009s ... 0.043s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 448 +0.002s ... 0.045s

#11 got single benchmarks 448 +0.013s ... 0.058s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.059s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.061s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.062s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.063s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.064s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.065s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.066s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.067s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.068s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.069s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.07s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.073s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.074s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.075s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.076s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.077s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.078s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.079s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.08s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.081s

#35 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.081s

#36 return log +0.024s ... 0.106s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)