Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T8300

Intel Core 2 Duo P7370

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.0 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. It is based on the 45nm Penryn core, but most likely Trusted Execution and Virtualization (VT-x) are disabled.

The P7370 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

Intel Core 2 Duo T8300

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 was at the time of announcement a fast dual-core CPU for laptops with 3 MB level 2 cache. It is based on the Penryn core with all features enabled (but without the full 6MB level 2 cache). The later announced Core 2 Duo P7450 was cheaper and used less power.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7370Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2400 MHz
FSB1066800
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
45 nm45 nm, 1-1.25V
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors410 Million
Die Size107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$241 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T8300

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2191 Points (18%)
min: 2406     avg: 2612     median: 2626 (21%)     max: 2704 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4022 Points (5%)
min: 3918     avg: 4773     median: 4837 (6%)     max: 4965 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1705     avg: 1712     median: 1711.5 (4%)     max: 1718 Points
min: 1986     avg: 2121     median: 2143 (5%)     max: 2181 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
25.2 s (5%)
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
60.3 s (3%)
min: 50     avg: 50.5     median: 50.5 (2%)     max: 51 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T8300 +
1206 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
17081 MIPS (8%)
22062 MIPS (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
14679 MFLOPS (11%)
17583 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
3060 Points (19%)
min: 4358     avg: 5255     median: 5311 (33%)     max: 6090 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.9 Points (70%)
min: 4     avg: 5.1     median: 5.3 (76%)     max: 5.4 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T8300 +
4628 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 → 122% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.19
log 28. 10:35:09

#0 checking url part for id 455 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 379 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 455 +0s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 455 +0.007s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 379 +0s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 379 +0.023s ... 0.033s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.034s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.039s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.04s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.04s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.041s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#48 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.042s

#49 return log +0.004s ... 0.046s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)