Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium P6200 vs Intel Pentium U5400

Intel Pentium P6200

► remove from comparison Intel P6200

The Intel Pentium P6200 is an entry level CPU for laptops. It clocks with 2.13 GHz and supports no TurboBoost for automatic overclocking. Furthermore AES instructions and hyperthreading are disabled. The CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but there may be some other power saving features disabled (as the Penryn - Pentium series had).

The P6200 is based on the Arrandale CPUs and therefore contains an integrated memory controller and Intel HD Graphics graphics card (both manufactured in 45nm, the CPU in 32nm). The also called GMA HD graphics in the CPU is clocked at 500MHz and is able to overclock to 667MHz due to Turbo Boost (GPU only).

The performance of the CPU is a bit limited due to the low clock rate and the missing Turbo Boost and Hyperthreading. Still the performance per GHz should be a bit better than similar clocked Core 2 Duo, because of the integrated memory controller and small improvements in the core.

Intel Pentium U5400

► remove from comparison Intel U5400

The Intel Pentium U5400 is an entry level CPU for thin and light laptops. It is based on the Arrandale core (Core i3/i5) but Turbo Boost (for the CPU), Hyper-Threading, Virtualization, Trusted Execution, and AES functions are disabled. Due to the slow clock speed, the U5400 is only sufficient for non demanding applications.

The Arrandale Pentium CPU features the integrated Intel HD Graphics graphics card which is clocked at 166-500 MHz (due to Turbo Boost). Furthermore, the CPU also features an integrated memory controller that supports up to 8 GB of DDR3-800 main memory.

ModelIntel Pentium P6200Intel Pentium U5400
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Pentium
CodenameArrandaleArrandale
Series: Pentium Arrandale
Intel Pentium P6300 compare2.27 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6200 « 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6100 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6000 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium U5600 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium U54001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6300 compare2.27 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P62002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6100 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6000 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium U5600 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium U5400 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Clock2133 MHz1200 MHz
FSB25002500
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt18 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million382+177 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm
Die Size81+114 mm281+114 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketPGA988BGA1288
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIntel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.28     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 P6200 +
0.7 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2389     avg: 2404     median: 2394 (14%)     max: 2428 Points
min: 1229     avg: 1286     median: 1285.5 (8%)     max: 1342 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4594     avg: 4619     median: 4620 (3%)     max: 4643 Points
min: 2593     avg: 2599     median: 2599 (2%)     max: 2605 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 5763     avg: 5773     median: 5773 (4%)     max: 5783 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2987     avg: 2997     median: 2996.5 (4%)     max: 3006 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 987     avg: 1031     median: 1031 (12%)     max: 1075 s
min: 1772     avg: 1791     median: 1790.5 (21%)     max: 1809 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 31.1     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (7%)     max: 33.84 s
min: 55.3     avg: 55.8     median: 55.8 (11%)     max: 56.2 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1396     avg: 1812     median: 1949 (4%)     max: 1954 Points
min: 1124     avg: 1126     median: 1126 (2%)     max: 1128 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 20.4     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (4%)     max: 20.75 s
min: 35     avg: 35.5     median: 35.5 (8%)     max: 36 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 46.88     avg: 47.5     median: 47.5 (2%)     max: 48.17 s
84.1 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1114 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
19570 MIPS (9%)
11000 MIPS (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
13850 MFLOPS (11%)
7660 MFLOPS (6%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 U5400 +
2641 Points (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
5.8 Points (74%)
3.9 Points (50%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium P6200 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium U5400 → 71% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 11:11:03

#0 checking url part for id 1507 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 993 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 05:32:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.015s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1507 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#7 got single benchmarks 1507 +0.023s ... 0.041s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 993 +0.002s ... 0.043s

#9 got single benchmarks 993 +0.02s ... 0.064s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.113s ... 0.177s

#12 return log +0.03s ... 0.207s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)