Notebookcheck Logo

Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 vs Apple A5 vs Texas Instruments OMAP 4430

Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4470

The OMAP 4470 is a fourth generation SoC (System on Chip) developed by Texas Instruments (TI) for use in mobile phones and tablets. The 45 nm chip includes dual ARM Cortex-A9 CPU cores running at 1.3 GHz up to 1.8 GHz on an ARM v7 instruction set and ARM NEON SIMD (Single instruction, multiple data) engine. 

The SoC integrates an SGX540 GPU from PowerVR clocked at 277 - 384 MHz, which can utilize the same 400 MHz dual-channel LPDDR2 memory controller as the two core processors. Compared to the OMAP 4430, the 4470 is clocked higher on both the CPU and GPU.

Apple A5

► remove from comparison

The Apple A5 is a dual-core processor that contains two Cortex A9 cores. Each core is max. clocked at 900 MHz. Furthermore, the A5 integrates a relative fast PowerVR SGX 543MP2 graphics card and 512MB ram (in the same package for the iPad 2). Apple states a maximum of 2x the performance compared to the previous single core Apple A4.

Texas Instruments OMAP 4430

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4430

The Texas Instruments (TI) OMAP 4430 is a SoC with two ARM Cortex-A9 cores including NEON SIMD engine, two Cortex M3 cores (to save power), a PowerVR SGX540 graphics card (304-365 MHz) and a dual channel LPDDR2 memory controller (max 400 MHz).

ModelTexas Instruments OMAP 4470Apple A5Texas Instruments OMAP 4430
Series Apple
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9Cortex A9
Series: Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44601.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM281551.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44301 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Apple A5x1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Apple A51 GHzcores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44601.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM281551.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44301 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Apple A5x1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Apple A5 « 1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44601.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM281551.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 « 1 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Apple A5x1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Apple A51 GHzcores Cortex A9
Clock1500 MHz1000 MHz1000 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 222 / 2
Technology45 nm40, 32 nm45 nm
FeaturesDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal ProcessorDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal Processor
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
TDP0.6 Watt
Manufacturerwww.ti.com

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 436     avg: 438     median: 438 (4%)     max: 440 Points
74%
A5 +
min: 297     avg: 317.7     median: 323 (3%)     max: 333 Points
191 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1302     avg: 1326     median: 1325.5 (12%)     max: 1349 Points
63%
A5 +
min: 751     avg: 807     median: 833 (8%)     max: 838 Points
923 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1895     avg: 1929     median: 1929 (4%)     max: 1963 Points
47%
A5 +
min: 737     avg: 855     median: 906 (2%)     max: 923 Points
183 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1118     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (2%)     max: 1153 Points
59%
A5 +
min: 552     avg: 638     median: 671 (1%)     max: 691 Points
449 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1367     avg: 1381     median: 1381 (4%)     max: 1395 Points
54%
A5 +
min: 631     avg: 715     median: 750 (2%)     max: 764 Points
424 Points (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 80.5     avg: 87.6     median: 87.6 (3%)     max: 94.6 MFLOPS
145%
A5 +
min: 124.4     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (4%)     max: 129.8 MFLOPS
min: 38.78     avg: 59.5     median: 63.7 (2%)     max: 71.9 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 52.5     avg: 55.4     median: 55.4 (5%)     max: 58.3 MFLOPS
148%
A5 +
min: 78.1     avg: 81.8     median: 81.8 (8%)     max: 85.4 MFLOPS
min: 36.48     avg: 40.8     median: 40.6 (4%)     max: 45.39 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1438     avg: 1497     median: 1497 (14%)     max: 1556 ms
96%
A5 +
min: 1557     avg: 1863     median: 1888.5 (18%)     max: 2118 ms
min: 1761     avg: 1955     median: 1895.5 (18%)     max: 2269 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 2747     avg: 3447     median: 3447 (8%)     max: 4147 points
min: 2475     avg: 2571     median: 2571 (6%)     max: 2666 points

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Apple A5 → 86% n=8

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 → 54% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 04:25:22

#0 checking url part for id 3647 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2331 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3004 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.112s ... 0.113s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.113s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3647 +0.003s ... 0.116s

#8 got single benchmarks 3647 +0.009s ... 0.125s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 2331 +0.003s ... 0.128s

#10 got single benchmarks 2331 +0.009s ... 0.137s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3004 +0.003s ... 0.139s

#12 got single benchmarks 3004 +0.022s ... 0.162s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.162s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.22s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.22s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)