Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M

NVIDIA NVS 2100M

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro NVS 3100M is a business graphics card that is based on the GT218 core (e.g. GeForce G210M / NVS 3100M) but with drivers that are optimized for stability and compatibility in business applications). Compared to the NVS 3100M, the NVS 2100M features a lower clock rate and therefore a bit slower performance.

Therefore, it is an entry level graphics card with low 3D performance that should be sufficient for low end games and demanding games in very low detail settings and resolutions. For example the old FEAR ran on a (faster) G210M in medium to high details fluently. Still, because of the "business drivers", the gaming performance of the NVS2100M may be worse.

The NVS 2100M supports PureVideo HD (with Video Processor VP4) to decode HD videos in the formats H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 ASP using the GPU. This helps reducing the CPU load and should lead to higher battery runtimes when viewing HD videos.

The chip should also support CUDA and DirectX Compute to access the computing power of the graphics card for general tasks (like encoding a video).

The power consumption of under 14 Watt (TDP of G210M) is relatively high for a business notebook, but compared to integrated graphic cards, the NVS 2100M should still provide more 3D performance.

NVIDIA NVS 4200M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA NVS 4200M (or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 4200M) is a business graphics card for laptops which is most likely based on the same core as the GeForce GT 520M. According to the Nvidia Homepage, the 4200M is allowed to be clocked up to 810MHz, compared to the 550MHz of the GT 520M. However, the clock rates of the NVS 4200M in the Dell Latitude 6420 is similar to the GT 520M.

The NVS series is optimized for business applications and stability and may therefore perform a bit worse in games due to the special drivers and BIOS optimizations.

The gaming performance may be a bit worse compared to similar clocked GeForce cards due to the stability optimizations of the NVS. In theory the raw performance of the chip is enough to run current games of 2010/2011 in low-medium details and resolutions.

As the GT 520M, the NVS4200M should support PureVideo HD (VP4) to accelerate HD videos and OpenCL / CUDA / DirectX Compute to use the render cores for other applications.

The graphics card supports HDMI 1.3 up to 1920x1080 and Multimode DisplayPort up to 2560x1600. Furthermore, 7.1 channel HD audio can be trasmitted over the HDMI port.

NVIDIA NVS 2100MNVIDIA NVS 4200M
NVS Series
NVS 4200M 48 @ 0.81 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
NVS 3100M compare 16 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
NVS 2100M 16 @ 0.54 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
NVS 4200M 48 @ 0.81 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
NVS 3100M compare 16 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
NVS 2100M 16 @ 0.54 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
ArchitectureGT2xxFermi
Pipelines16 - unified48 - unified
Core Speed535 MHz810 MHz
Shader Speed1230 MHz1620 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, DDR3DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm40 nm
Date of Announcement07.01.2010 22.02.2011
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/nvs_techspe...http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvs_techspe...
Notebook Sizemedium sized

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 507     avg: 605     median: 572 (1%)     max: 806 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 496     avg: 519     median: 507 (1%)     max: 541 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA NVS 2100M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
992 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 2142     avg: 2309     median: 2298 (2%)     max: 2443 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA NVS 2100M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
769 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 1819     avg: 1896     median: 1917 (1%)     max: 1969 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 18589     avg: 20086     median: 20085.5 (21%)     max: 21582 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 9591     avg: 9597     median: 9597 (5%)     max: 9603 Points
min: 12527     avg: 12674     median: 12634 (7%)     max: 12860 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6439     avg: 6443     median: 6442.5 (9%)     max: 6446 Points
min: 9189     avg: 9507     median: 9462 (13%)     max: 9801 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA NVS 2100M
3DMark 06
2971 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 4601     avg: 4906     median: 4929 (7%)     max: 5118 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA NVS 2100M
3DMark 06
3375 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA NVS 2100M
3DMark 06
3449 Points (5%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 7.1     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (1%)     max: 7.8 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 1.99     avg: 2.4     median: 2.1 (1%)     max: 3.29 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 0.7     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.97 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 4.4     avg: 5.4     median: 5.1 (6%)     max: 6.68 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 0.82     avg: 1     median: 1 (4%)     max: 1.12 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 3.04     avg: 4.9     median: 5.4 (4%)     max: 6.27 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 6.79     avg: 8.6     median: 9 (10%)     max: 9.97 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 5.1     avg: 5.7     median: 5.8 (3%)     max: 6.36 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 2.6     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (4%)     max: 3.71 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
5.7 Points (72%)
min: 6.4     avg: 6.4     median: 6.4 (81%)     max: 6.5 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
4.9 Points (62%)
min: 4.7     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (71%)     max: 6.4 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA NVS 2100M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3000     avg: 3084     median: 3084 (13%)     max: 3168 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 4816     avg: 5327     median: 5185 (22%)     max: 6163 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA NVS 2100M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 7.13     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (3%)     max: 7.15 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 15.5     avg: 16.1     median: 16.1 (6%)     max: 16.71 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA NVS 2100M → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA NVS 4200M → 172% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
47.7  fps
med. 1366x768
NVS 4200M:
17.6  fps
high 1366x768
NVS 4200M:
11.7  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
NVS 4200M:
95  fps
med. 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
36  fps
high 1360x768
NVS 4200M:
24  fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVS 4200M:
12  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
108.6 116 ~ 112 fps
high 1360x768
NVS 4200M:
74 76 ~ 75 fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
NVS 4200M:
41  fps
med. 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
24.7 31 ~ 28 fps
high 1360x768
NVS 4200M:
19.1 25 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVS 4200M:
14  fps
low 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
149  fps
med. 1360x768
NVS 4200M:
30  fps
high 1360x768
NVS 4200M:
19  fps
low 1024x768
100%
NVS 2100M:
26  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
NVS 2100M:
12  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
22 25.5 ~ 24 fps
high 1366x768
NVS 4200M:
14 16.1 ~ 15 fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
33  fps
high 1366x768
NVS 4200M:
23  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
43.2 48 ~ 46 fps
high 1360x768
NVS 4200M:
19 19.1 ~ 19 fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
100.7  fps
ultra 1280x1024
NVS 4200M:
12.9  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
100%
NVS 2100M:
93  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
NVS 2100M:
30  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA NVS 2100M → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 19:34:39

#0 checking url part for id 1633 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2439 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 May 2022 17:25:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.045s ... 0.045s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.046s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#7 composed specs +0s ... 0.046s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#9 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1633 +0.029s ... 0.075s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#12 got single benchmarks 1633 +0.007s ... 0.083s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 2439 +0s ... 0.083s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#15 got single benchmarks 2439 +0.015s ... 0.099s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.099s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.1s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.101s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.101s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.102s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.103s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.103s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.104s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.107s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.11s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.111s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#126 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.114s

#127 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.114s

#128 Got 36 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.121s

#129 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.121s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#146 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.124s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.126s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.128s

#155 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#157 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.129s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#169 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.132s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#173 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.133s

#174 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.134s

#176 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#177 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.135s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.136s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#183 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.136s

#184 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.136s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.137s

#186 return log +0.003s ... 0.139s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)