Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

The Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is a professional high-end graphics card for powerful laptops and mobile workstations. The Max-Q variants are lower clocked versions that are running more efficient and can be used in smaller chassis than the regular versions. It is based on the same TU104 chip as the consumer GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q but offers more shaders (128 more). Compared to the desktop RTX 5000, the mobile variant offers lower clock speeds. There are different versions available with 90, 85 and 80 Watt TGP power consumption.

ModelTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro RTX 5000 Desktop23016201815
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile15013501770
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile11010351545
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q909301455
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q857651395
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q806001350

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Features

NVIDIA manufacturers the TU104 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games support it). The Quadro RTX 5000 is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).

Performance

Compared to the regular Quadro RTX 5000 version, the Max-Q variants can be up to 27% slower (lower Turbo speeds) and therefore reach levels of the slower RTX 4000. Compared to consumer verisons, the Quadro variants have advantages due to the professional drivers and the large VRAM.

The still relatively high power consumption of the RTX5000 Max-Q makes the card most suited for big laptops.

Quadro Turing Series

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19E-Q5 MAX-Q
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines3072 - unified
Core Speed600 - 930 - 1350 - 1455 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption80 - 90 Watt
Transistor Count13.6 Billion
technology12 nm
FeaturesNVLink, DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement27.05.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
9 pt (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 6801     avg: 7289     median: 7282.5 (21%)     max: 7920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 6999     avg: 7432     median: 7396 (20%)     max: 7977 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 25769     avg: 34615     median: 32096 (34%)     max: 52005 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 50993     avg: 78524     median: 64768 (17%)     max: 126073 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 16005     avg: 16773     median: 16600.5 (29%)     max: 18226 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 18247     avg: 19825     median: 19790 (22%)     max: 21115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 19250     avg: 21300     median: 20890 (29%)     max: 23789 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 24156     avg: 26602     median: 26465 (23%)     max: 28524 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 106.8     avg: 125.7     median: 122.8 (30%)     max: 156.9 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 120.7     avg: 139.8     median: 138.4 (20%)     max: 165 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 89     avg: 95.8     median: 96.5 (21%)     max: 100.3 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 57.8     avg: 62.6     median: 62.7 (16%)     max: 66.4 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 70.3     avg: 83.4     median: 81.6 (22%)     max: 105.4 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 13.3     avg: 14.5     median: 14.3 (13%)     max: 16.1 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 114.1     avg: 127     median: 125.2 (50%)     max: 145.1 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 113.1     avg: 126.4     median: 123.6 (20%)     max: 154.9 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 158.9     avg: 176.3     median: 180.9 (32%)     max: 184.3 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 119.7     avg: 135.3     median: 134 (36%)     max: 158.9 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 244.1     avg: 287     median: 289.8 (32%)     max: 306.1 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 89.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.5 (21%)     max: 98.7 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 79     avg: 89.8     median: 89.9 (19%)     max: 102.5 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 179.5     avg: 206.4     median: 206 (23%)     max: 231.3 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 35.39     avg: 37.3     median: 36.9 (12%)     max: 39.92 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 181.9     avg: 217.7     median: 220.5 (32%)     max: 238.4 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 186.9     avg: 222.1     median: 220.4 (24%)     max: 259.7 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 157.3     avg: 174.8     median: 176.5 (31%)     max: 181.8 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 175.3     avg: 205.9     median: 210 (12%)     max: 230 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 117     avg: 126     median: 126 (18%)     max: 135 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 122     avg: 123     median: 123 (17%)     max: 124 Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
90  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
85  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) 1920x1080
30
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
208.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
188.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
181.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
170  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
143  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
84.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
296  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
225.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
203.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
185.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
125.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
70.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
113.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
106  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
84.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
79.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
69.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
58.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
53.7
low 1280x720
120  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86 89 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
69  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
100.1 127.2 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
100.5 112.6 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.3 103.8 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
97.4 101.5 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
70 73.7 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39 41.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
214 219 ~ 217 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
158 166 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135 143 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107 108 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
82.8 83 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44.4 47 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
177.7 226.8 ~ 202 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
126.6 151 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90.7 110.2 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73.6 84.6 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
50 54.3 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24 27.6 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
213.8 216.7 ~ 215 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
159.9 161.9 ~ 161 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
142.3 145 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
137.8 140.6 145.3 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
92.5 103.2 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.1 54.5 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
158.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
52.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
107.5 124.2 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84.8 89.1 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.8 63.9 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.7 41.3 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32 32.9 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.8 25.2 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
88.5 105 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83.1 99.5 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80.4 89.7 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64 66.3 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.5 34 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
92.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
65.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
156.5 185.2 ~ 171 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
111.2 130.6 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
99 103.6 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86.7 91.8 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
62.2 65.2 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34 35.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
63.2
62.6
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 3840x2160
25.2
24.5
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
131.5 178.8 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
107.8 155.6 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.2 118.5 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79.2 87.2 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
61.4 62.7 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.8 38.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
117 127 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96 105 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
92 93 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65 68 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47 49 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26 28 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
118.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
42.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
223.5 228.8 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.2 96.7 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.5 69.9 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
42.7 43 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.1 20 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
40.2
40.8
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
113 192 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
101 165 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93 131 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88 118 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
83 86 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52 56 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
218.6 243.7 ~ 231 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
120.2 129 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80.9 87.3 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.5 64.9 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
34.1 43.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.5 21.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
224  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
114.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
94.5 95.8 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90.9 97.8 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69.3 73.9 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.4 38.9 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31.5 34.7 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
241.2 275 ~ 258 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
169.4 188.9 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
153 160.3 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89.3 90.7 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.8 70.2 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
104 107 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90 98 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88 90 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81 86 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72 74 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43 43 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
115.2 145.6 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.8 96.3 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.9 72.8 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.4 59.2 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.4 45.6 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.2 27 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
47.5
48.9
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
142.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
104.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
53.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
139.4 153.6 156.6 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105.4 130.7 130.8 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.2 120.4 124.5 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.2 112.1 114.7 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68.3 90.8 91.6 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.5 53.4 53.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
66.8
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
87.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
85.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
73.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
95 107 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80 91 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75 80 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54 57 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47 48 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30 31 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
105 127 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94 102 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
91 98 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85 87 90 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59 62 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29 33 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
106
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
128  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
74  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
115
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
595  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
367.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
175.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
109.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
96.1 96.3 100 109 113 117 118 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84.9 86.9 88 94.9 98.9 99 102 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.2 72.9 73.4 78.7 82 85 85.7 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.8 56.6 60.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
87 132 154 177 ~ 138 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82.3 99.7 101 103 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65.8 77.3 79.4 80.8 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56 58.4 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.6 32.8 33.9 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
113  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset TAA 2560x1440
64
low 1280x720
130.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
85.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset 16xAF TAA 3840x2160
27.5
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
246.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
162.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
156  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
123.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Extreme Preset 16xAF TAA 3840x2160
40.8
low 1280x768
84.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
281.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
198.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
134.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
110.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
254.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
226.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
191.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
183.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
86.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset 16xAF TAA 3840x2160
79
low 1280x720
138.4 140.8 142 148 156 161 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
126 128.7 130.1 137 142 143 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117 119 120.1 124.5 130 132 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
111 112 114.9 122 122.3 126 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
96.7 98.7 102 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
281.8 286.9 298.9 299 320 323.2 353.2 ~ 309 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
225.5 229.5 235 235.8 238.8 249.4 249.8 ~ 238 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
125.4 139.1 141 144.8 145.3 149.8 158.2 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71 77.3 79.5 81.1 83.3 83.6 84.6 85 85.3 88.5 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
46.4 47.5 49.2 50.4 52.5 55.4 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
34.3
35.9
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
169.1 177 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
163.4 170 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
132.3 150.4 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72 77.6 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68.4 89.1 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
320.5 365.3 ~ 343 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
283.2 321.5 ~ 302 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
265 296.5 ~ 281 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
167.2 168.5 174.3 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Watch Dogs Legion908575513721
FIFA 21208.3188.7181.617014384.4
Star Wars Squadrons296225.7203.3185.3125.970.4
Mafia Definitive Edition113.690.382.956.730.2
Serious Sam 410684.779.869.657.534.9
Flight Simulator 202058.3494434.326.916.1
Horizon Zero Dawn12010393886942
Death Stranding114107101997240
F1 20202171621391088346
Gears Tactics202139100795226
Doom Eternal2151611441419851
Hunt Showdown158.2106.29452.526.7
Red Dead Redemption 21168759413223
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order9791856534
Need for Speed Heat92.384.477.572.165.436.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019171121101896435
GRID 2019155132107836238
Ghost Recon Breakpoint12210193674827
Borderlands 3118.899.978.462.542.922.8
Control22695684320
F1 20191531331121038554
Total War: Three Kingdoms23112584613920
Rage 2224114.896.494.359.428.7
Anno 1800959472383321.2
The Division 214411297565127
Dirt Rally 2.0258179157906939.8
Far Cry New Dawn1069489847343
Metro Exodus1309270573626
Apex Legends144144144142.8104.953.4
Battlefield V1501221111038450
Hitman 287.785.378.475.373.346.6
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey1018678564831
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1169895876131
Far Cry 5128106101967440
World of Tanks enCore595367.5175.5109.652.3
X-Plane 11.11107947955
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark13897765732
Middle-earth: Shadow of War113108988638
Ghost Recon Wildlands130.491.985.758.738.6
For Honor246.1162.1156123.248.1
Ashes of the Singularity84.477.775.442.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider281.4198.6134.5110.145.4
Rainbow Six Siege254.8226.7191.8183.486.9
Dota 2 Reborn14813412411899
The Witcher 33092381438250
GTA V1731671417579
BioShock Infinite343302281170
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
15
30

1
26
20

2
31
13

8
25
8
1
16
17
2
13
28
5

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 14:06:49

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.054s ... 0.055s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.055s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9880 +0.035s ... 0.09s

#7 got single benchmarks 9880 +0.034s ... 0.125s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.125s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.203s ... 1.327s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.327s

#11 Got 477 rows for game benchmarks. +0.108s ... 1.435s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.435s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.04s ... 1.475s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +3.199s ... 4.675s

#15 return log +0.066s ... 4.741s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q graphics card

HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Workstation Review: Vapor Chamber for Maximum Performance

HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Workstation Review: Vapor Chamber for Maximum Performance

10 percent lighter and 12 percent smaller than the previous generation ZBook 15 G6, the ZBook 15 G7 is a huge overhaul that doesn't sacrifice key workstation fe...
Intel Xeon W-10885M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.4 kg
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Review: Powerful workstation with weaknesses

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Review: Powerful workstation with weaknesses

The Asus workstation scores some major points in our review thanks to a very high level of performance, 4K display and 16 GB of VRAM. Moreover, our review devic...
Intel Core i7-9750H | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 15.60" | 2 kg
MSI WS66 10TMT Workstation Laptop Review: Faster Than The Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition

MSI WS66 10TMT Workstation Laptop Review: Faster Than The Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition

As it turns out, gaming laptops can make for pretty good workstations. The MSI WS66 doesn't sacrifice performance for its compact size, but you'll have to make ...
Intel Core i9-10980HK | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.3 kg
Dell Precision 7550 Mobile Workstation Review: The Antithesis To The Precision 5550

Dell Precision 7550 Mobile Workstation Review: The Antithesis To The Precision 5550

If the XPS 15 had gained some weight, it would probably look a lot like the Precision 7550. This high-end mobile workstation drops the super-thin and sexy desig...
Intel Xeon W-10885M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.8 kg
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (2020) Laptop Review: Small changes, better overall package

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (2020) Laptop Review: Small changes, better overall package

Razer’s workstation features a lot of performance, a 4K OLED touchscreen, a Thunderbolt 3 port, 32 GB of RAM (running in dual-channel mode), 16 GB of VRAM and a...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.2 kg

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition in Review: Solid Workstation with a Lot of Performance

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE: Intel Core i7-9850H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P53 in Review: Classic workstation with a lot of GPU performance

HP ZBook Fury 15 G7: Intel Xeon W-10885M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Fury 15 G7

Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G1-20ST001HGE: Intel Core i9-10885H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G1-20ST001HGE

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G1, Xeon W-10885M RTX 5000 Max-Q: Intel Xeon W-10885M, 17.30", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G1, Xeon W-10885M RTX 5000 Max-Q

MSI WS66 10TMT-207US: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI WS66 10TMT-207US

Dell Precision 7550: Intel Xeon W-10885M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 7550

Acer ConceptD 7 Pro CN715-71P-770L: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 7 Pro CN715-71P-770L

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T-HC013R: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T-HC013R

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN0012PB: Intel Xeon E-2276M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN0012PB

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE: Intel Core i7-9850H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE

HP ZBook Fury 15 G7: Intel Xeon W-10885M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
   » HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 owners should update their BIOS or face immense performance deficits

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2 kg
   » The Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15: 5000 Euros (~$5908) is too much money for a workstation without a Thunderbolt 3 port

MSI WS66 10TMT-207US: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.3 kg
   » Core i9-powered MSI WS66 workstation is super sleek, super fast and super loud

Dell Precision 7550: Intel Xeon W-10885M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
   » Dell Precision 7550 comes with almost everything you'd expect from a mobile workstation except for full-power Quadro RTX 5000 graphics

Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
   » Deep blacks thanks to an OLED screen - The Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 review

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE: Intel Core i7-9850H, 15.60", 2.7 kg
   » Lenovo's ThinkPad P53 offers incredible GPU horsepower

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Graphics Card
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-06-17)