Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Phenom II X2 N620 vs AMD Phenom II X2 P650

AMD Phenom II X2 N620

► remove from comparison

The AMD Phenom II Dual-Core Mobile N620 is a dual core processor for laptops that clocks with 2.8 GHz. Due to the missing level 3 cache, the architecture is similar to the desktop Athlon II X2 (Athlon II X2 240e - Regor).

The performance should be similar to a 2.6 GHz Core 2 Duo (because of the larger Cache of the Core 2 series in this clock range). Compared to current Intel Core-i processors, the Phenom II N620 is only as fast as an entry level Core i3-330M in synthetic benchmarks.

As a difference to the Core 2 series, the Phenom II offers an integrated DDR3 memory controller on the processor die.

AMD Phenom II X2 P650

► remove from comparison

The AMD Phenom II Dual-Core Mobile P650 is a dual core processor for laptops that clocks with 2.8 GHz. Due to the missing level 3 cache, the architecture is similar to the desktop Athlon II X2 (Athlon II X2 240e - Regor). Compared to the similar Phenom II N620, the P650 is specified with a lower TDP of 25 versus 35 Watt.

The performance should be similar to a 2.6 GHz Core 2 Duo (because of the larger Cache of the Core 2 series in this clock range). Compared to the current Intel Core-i processors, the Phenom II is only as fast as a Core i3-330M in synthetic benchmarks.

As a difference to the Core 2 series, the Phenom II offers an integrated DDR3 memory controller on the processor die.

ModelAMD Phenom II X2 N620AMD Phenom II X2 P650
SeriesAMD Phenom II X2AMD Phenom II X2
CodenameChamplainChamplain
Series: Phenom II X2 Champlain
AMD Phenom II X2 X640 BE compare3.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Phenom II X2 X620 BE compare3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Phenom II X2 N660 compare3 GHz2 / 2
AMD Phenom II X2 N640 compare2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD Phenom II X2 P6502.8 GHz2 / 2
» AMD Phenom II X2 N6202.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD Phenom II X2 X640 BE compare3.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Phenom II X2 X620 BE compare3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Phenom II X2 N660 compare3 GHz2 / 2
AMD Phenom II X2 N640 compare2.9 GHz2 / 2
» AMD Phenom II X2 P6502.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD Phenom II X2 N6202.8 GHz2 / 2
Clock2800 MHz2800 MHz
FSB36003600
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
SocketS1S1
FeaturesDDR3 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VurtualizationDDR3 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Vurtualization
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Phenom II X2 N620

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N620 +
min: 2445     avg: 2491     median: 2503 (22%)     max: 2524 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N620 +
min: 4767     avg: 4828     median: 4810 (7%)     max: 4907 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N620 +
865 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N620 +
min: 26.7     avg: 26.9     median: 26.9 (5%)     max: 27.16 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 N620 +
28.1 s (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N620 +
min: 2209     avg: 2288     median: 2282 (5%)     max: 2373 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N620 +
min: 27.3     avg: 27.7     median: 27.5 (6%)     max: 28.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N620 +
65.3 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N620 +
min: 19060     avg: 19325     median: 19325 (9%)     max: 19590 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N620 +
min: 16120     avg: 17305     median: 17305 (13%)     max: 18490 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N620 +
4599 Points (29%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Phenom II X2 N620 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 22. 16:59:57

#0 checking url part for id 963 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1340 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 963 +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 got single benchmarks 963 +0.007s ... 0.012s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 1340 +0s ... 0.012s

#18 got single benchmarks 1340 +0s ... 0.012s

#19 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.012s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#42 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.016s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.024s ... 0.04s

#44 return log +0.005s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)