Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N570 vs Intel Atom N470 vs Intel Atom N475

Intel Atom N570

► remove from comparison Intel N570

The Intel Atom N570 is a dual core Atom CPU for small netbooks and offers relative slow performance but also features a low power consumption. Because of the "in order" execution, the Atom series CPUs are slower than Core / Celeron CPUs at the same clock rate. The N570 is produced in 45nm and supports DDR3 main memory. It contains the GMA3150 graphics card on the same chip.

Intel Atom N470

► remove from comparison Intel N470

The Intel Atom N470 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2 main memory and the GMA 3150 graphics card. Compared to the N450, the N470 is higher clocked and is specified for 6.5 Watt TDP instead of 5.5 Watt of the N450.

The performance of the whole system (Atom N470 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is said to be only marginally above a similar clocked Atom Z / GMA 950. Compared to the N450, the CPU performance is about 5-10% better on average.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 6.5 Watt TDP). Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops.

 

 

 

 

 

Intel Atom N475

► remove from comparison Intel N475

The Intel Atom N475 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2 and DDR3 main memory (max 2 GB, single channel) and the GMA 3150 graphics card. Compared to the N455, the N475 is higher clocked and is specified for 6.5 Watt TDP instead of 5.5 Watt of the N455. The N470 offers only DDR2 support.

The performance of the whole system (Atom N475 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is said to be only marginally above a similar clocked Atom Z / GMA 950.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 6.5 Watt TDP). Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops.

ModelIntel Atom N570Intel Atom N470Intel Atom N475
SeriesIntel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenamePineviewPineviewPineview
Series: Atom Pineview
» Intel Atom N5701.66 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N5501.5 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N4751.86 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom N4701.86 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom N5701.66 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N5501.5 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N4751.86 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom N4701.86 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom N5701.66 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N5501.5 GHz2 / 4
» Intel Atom N4751.86 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom N4701.86 GHz1 / 2
Clock1660 MHz1860 MHz1860 MHz
FSB666533533
L1 Cache112 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 41 / 21 / 2
TDP8.5 Watt6.5 Watt6.5 Watt
Transistors176 Million123 Million123 Million
Technology45 nm45 nm45 nm
Die Size87 mm266 mm266 mm2
Socket437FCBGA559FCBGA559
FeaturesIntegrated DDR3 Memory Controller, MMX, SSE (1,2,3,3S), EM64T, Enhanced Speedstep, HyperThreading, Execute Disable Bitintegrated DDR2 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, Hyper-Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, Execute Disable Bitintegrated DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU
Architecturex86x86x86
$86 U.S.$75 U.S.$75 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Atom N570Intel Atom N470Intel Atom N475
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N570 +
min: 417     avg: 534     median: 565.5 (5%)     max: 589 Points
106%
N470 +
min: 570     avg: 593     median: 600 (5%)     max: 610 Points
105%
N475 +
min: 582     avg: 595     median: 594.5 (5%)     max: 607 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N570 +
min: 1361     avg: 1569     median: 1629.5 (2%)     max: 1654 Points
min: 640     avg: 838     median: 930 (1%)     max: 943 Points
min: 940     avg: 949     median: 949 (1%)     max: 958 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N570 +
1863 s (22%)
min: 3366     avg: 3404     median: 3403.5 (40%)     max: 3441 s
3308 s (39%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N570 +
59 s (12%)
min: 105.4     avg: 106.7     median: 106.7 (21%)     max: 108 s
104.9 s (21%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N570 +
min: 661     avg: 738     median: 738 (2%)     max: 815 Points
min: 535     avg: 538     median: 537.5 (1%)     max: 540 Points
544 Points (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N570 +
min: 88.8     avg: 98.9     median: 98.9 (21%)     max: 109 s
104%
N470 +
min: 84     avg: 95     median: 84.9 (18%)     max: 116 s
105%
N475 +
80 s (17%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N570 +
238 s (10%)
102%
N470 +
min: 191     avg: 203.2     median: 193.6 (8%)     max: 225 s
103%
N475 +
176 s (8%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N570 +
3628 s (16%)
min: 4110     avg: 4739     median: 4739 (21%)     max: 5368 s
3958 s (18%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N570 +
8000 MIPS (4%)
57%
1 N470 +
min: 4500     avg: 4560     median: 4559.5 (2%)     max: 4619 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N470 +
min: 3850     avg: 3854     median: 3853.5 (3%)     max: 3857 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N470 +
1479 Points (9%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
N570 +
min: 3.2     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (42%)     max: 3.4 Points
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (34%)     max: 2.7 Points
2.6 Points (33%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N570 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N470 → 87% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N475 → 88% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 05. 09:08:16

#0 checking url part for id 1593 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 540 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 604 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 1593 +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#17 got single benchmarks 1593 +0.012s ... 0.022s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 540 +0s ... 0.023s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#20 got single benchmarks 540 +0.008s ... 0.031s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 604 +0s ... 0.032s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#23 got single benchmarks 604 +0.006s ... 0.038s

#24 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.039s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#79 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.049s

#80 return log +0s ... 0.049s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)