AMD Turion II N550 vs AMD Turion II P520

AMD Turion II N550

► remove

The AMD Turion II Dual-Core N550 ist a mobile laptop processor with two cores. It is based on the desktop Athlon II processors (due to the missing level 3 cache) and offers an integrated DDR3-1066 memory controller. The connection to the chipset is done with a single 16-Bit HyperTransport 3.0 link clocked at 1800MHz (3600MHz effective).

Compared to Intel Core 2 Duo processors at that clock range, the Turion II offers less cache and is therefore slower. Furthermore, comparing two CPUs with the same amount of cache, the Intel CPUs are still a bit faster (by 100 MHz on the average).

With 35 Watt TDP, the CPU is intended for mid sized laptops with a display size of 14-inches and larger.

AMD Turion II P520

► remove

The AMD Turion II Dual-Core Mobile P520 is a dual-core processor for laptops based on the same architecture like the desktop Athlon II CPUs (K10.5 with missing level 3 cache). The CPU integrates a 533 MHz dual-channel DDR3 memory controller and communicates with a single 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport 3.0 link. The Turion II P520 is manufactured in 45nm SOI.

The performance is somewhere between a 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo (e.g. T4300 in Cinebench 10 Multi) and a 2.3 GHz Core 2 Duo (e.g. wPrime). Therefore, the CPU is positioned in the entry level for multimedia laptops.

AMD Turion II N550AMD Turion II P520
AMD Turion IIAMD Turion II
ChamplainChamplain
: Turion II Champlain
AMD Turion II N570 (compare)2700 MHz2 / 2
» AMD Turion II N5502600 MHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II P560 (compare)2500 MHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II N530 (compare)2500 MHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II P540 (compare)2400 MHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II P5202300 MHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II N570 (compare)2700 MHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II N5502600 MHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II P560 (compare)2500 MHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II N530 (compare)2500 MHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II P540 (compare)2400 MHz2 / 2
» AMD Turion II P5202300 MHz2 / 2
2600 MHz2300 MHz
36003600
265 KB128 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
35 25
45 45
S1S1 (S1g4)
MMX, 3DNow!, SSE(1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, DDR3-1066 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0, integrated DDR3-1066 memory controller
AMD Turion II P520

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
P520 +
1.3 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
P520 +
min: 2043     avg: 2054.3     median: 2047 (22%)     max: 2073 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
P520 +
min: 3965     avg: 3983     median: 3969 (8%)     max: 4015 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
P520 +
5020 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
P520 +
2570 Points (25%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
100%
P520 +
1057.1 seconds (12%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
100%
P520 +
33.7 seconds (7%)
wPrime 1.55 - 32m *
100%
P520 +
34.3 seconds (18%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
P520 +
min: 1847     avg: 1891.7     median: 1863 (13%)     max: 1965 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
P520 +
min: 32.7     avg: 33.1     median: 33.1 (7%)     max: 33.5 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
P520 +
77.3 Seconds (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
P520 +
min: 16680     avg: 19647     median: 19647 (9%)     max: 22614 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
P520 +
13310 MFLOPS (10%)
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
100%
P520 +
4097 Points (26%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
P520 +
min: 5.6     avg: 5.7     median: 5.8 (74%)     max: 5.8 points
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
P520 +
3706 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Turion II P520 → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)