, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Atom N550 vs Intel Atom N475

Intel Atom N550

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N550 is a dual core Atom CPU for small netbooks and offers relative slow performance but also features a low power consumption. Because of the "in order" execution, the Atom series CPUs are slower than Core / Celeron CPUs at the same clock rate. The N550 is produced in 45nm and supports DDR3 main memory. It contains the GMA3150 graphics card on the same chip.

Intel Atom N475

► remove from comparison Intel N475

The Intel Atom N475 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2 and DDR3 main memory (max 2 GB, single channel) and the GMA 3150 graphics card. Compared to the N455, the N475 is higher clocked and is specified for 6.5 Watt TDP instead of 5.5 Watt of the N455. The N470 offers only DDR2 support.

The performance of the whole system (Atom N475 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is said to be only marginally above a similar clocked Atom Z / GMA 950.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 6.5 Watt TDP). Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops.

Intel Atom N550Intel Atom N475
Intel AtomIntel Atom
PineviewPineview
Series: Atom Pineview
Intel Atom N570 compare1.66 GHz2 / 4
» Intel Atom N5501.5 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N4751.86 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom N470 compare1.86 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom N570 compare1.66 GHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N5501.5 GHz2 / 4
» Intel Atom N4751.86 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom N470 compare1.86 GHz1 / 2
1500 MHz1860 MHz
666533
112 KB
1 MB512 KB
2 / 41 / 2
8.5 6.5
176 123
45 45
87 mm266 mm2
437FCBGA559
Integrated DDR3 Memory Controller, MMX, SSE (1,2,3,3S), EM64T, Enhanced Speedstep, HyperThreading, Execute Disable Bitintegrated DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.$75 U.S.
Intel Atom N550Intel Atom N475
100 °C

Benchmarks

115%
N475 +
min: 582     avg: 595     median: 594.5 (5%)     max: 607
min: 940     avg: 949     median: 949 (2%)     max: 958
3308 s (39%)
105 s (21%)
544 Points (3%)
105%
N475 +
80 s (17%)
102%
N475 +
176 s (8%)
105%
N475 +
3958 s (18%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N550 +
min: 7534     avg: 7612     median: 7558.5 (4%)     max: 7764 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N550 +
min: 6296     avg: 6354     median: 6306.5 (5%)     max: 6487 MFLOPS
2.6 Points (33%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N550 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N475 → 91% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 19. 15:27:12

#0 checking url part for id 780 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 604 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:08:09 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 780 +0s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 780 +0.024s ... 0.032s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 604 +0s ... 0.032s

#9 got single benchmarks 604 +0.006s ... 0.038s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.047s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.051s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)