Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N475 vs Intel Atom N470

Intel Atom N475

► remove from comparison Intel N475

The Intel Atom N475 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2 and DDR3 main memory (max 2 GB, single channel) and the GMA 3150 graphics card. Compared to the N455, the N475 is higher clocked and is specified for 6.5 Watt TDP instead of 5.5 Watt of the N455. The N470 offers only DDR2 support.

The performance of the whole system (Atom N475 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is said to be only marginally above a similar clocked Atom Z / GMA 950.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 6.5 Watt TDP). Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops.

Intel Atom N470

► remove from comparison Intel N470

The Intel Atom N470 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2 main memory and the GMA 3150 graphics card. Compared to the N450, the N470 is higher clocked and is specified for 6.5 Watt TDP instead of 5.5 Watt of the N450.

The performance of the whole system (Atom N470 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is said to be only marginally above a similar clocked Atom Z / GMA 950. Compared to the N450, the CPU performance is about 5-10% better on average.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 6.5 Watt TDP). Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops.

 

 

 

 

 

show full text
ModelIntel Atom N475Intel Atom N470
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenamePineviewPineview
Series: Atom Pineview
Intel Atom N570 compare1.66 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N550 compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N475 « 1.86 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N4701.86 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N570 compare1.66 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N550 compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N4751.86 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N470 « 1.86 GHz1 / 2 cores
Clock1860 MHz1860 MHz
FSB533533
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 21 / 2
TDP6.5 Watt6.5 Watt
Transistors123 Million123 Million
Technology45 nm45 nm
Die Size66 mm266 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA559FCBGA559
Featuresintegrated DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPUintegrated DDR2 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, Hyper-Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$75 U.S.$75 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N475 +
min: 582     avg: 595     median: 594.5 (4%)     max: 607 Points
101%
N470 +
min: 570     avg: 593     median: 600 (4%)     max: 610 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N475 +
min: 940     avg: 949     median: 949 (1%)     max: 958 Points
min: 640     avg: 838     median: 930 (1%)     max: 943 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N475 +
3308 s (39%)
min: 3366     avg: 3404     median: 3403.5 (40%)     max: 3441 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N475 +
104.9 s (21%)
100%
N470 +
min: 105.4     avg: 106.7     median: 106.7 (21%)     max: 108 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N475 +
544 Points (1%)
min: 535     avg: 538     median: 537.5 (1%)     max: 540 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N475 +
80 s (17%)
min: 84     avg: 95     median: 84.9 (18%)     max: 116 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N475 +
176 s (8%)
min: 191     avg: 203.2     median: 193.6 (8%)     max: 225 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N475 +
3958 s (18%)
min: 4110     avg: 4739     median: 4739 (21%)     max: 5368 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N470 +
min: 4500     avg: 4560     median: 4559.5 (2%)     max: 4619 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N470 +
min: 3850     avg: 3854     median: 3853.5 (3%)     max: 3857 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N470 +
1479 Points (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
N475 +
2.6 Points (33%)
102%
N470 +
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (34%)     max: 2.7 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N475 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N470 → 99% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 17:56:14

#0 checking url part for id 604 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 540 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 604 +0.002s ... 0.023s

#7 got single benchmarks 604 +0.01s ... 0.033s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 540 +0.002s ... 0.035s

#9 got single benchmarks 540 +0.012s ... 0.047s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.057s ... 0.104s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.127s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)