Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N455 vs Intel Atom N450

Intel Atom N455

► remove from comparison Intel N455

The Intel Atom N455 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR3 main memory (the difference to the Atom N450) and the GMA 3150 graphics card

The performance of the whole system (Atom N455 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is only marginally above a similar clocked Atom N280 / GMA 950.

An advantage of the combination, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 6.5 Watt TDP). Intel states 20% power reduction and 60% package reduction. Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops. Compared to the Z500 series combined with the US15W chipset (2.4+2.3 W), the power consumption is similar.

Intel Atom N450

► remove from comparison Intel N450

The Intel Atom N450 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2 main memory and the GMA 3150 graphics card. 

The performance of the whole system (Atom N450 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is only marginally above a similar clocked Atom N280 / GMA 950. To decode HD videos in 1080p the N450 / GMA3150 needs the help from a additional chip like the the ION2 or Broadcom video decoder.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 5.5 Watt TDP). Intel states 20% power reduction and 60% package reduction. Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops. Compared to the Z500 series combined with the US15W chipset (2.4+2.3 W), the power consumption is similar.

ModelIntel Atom N455Intel Atom N450
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenamePinetrailPinetrail
Series: Atom Pinetrail
Intel Atom D525 compare1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N455 « 1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N4501.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N435 compare1.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom D525 compare1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N4551.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N450 « 1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N435 compare1.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Clock1660 MHz1660 MHz
FSB533533
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 21 / 2
TDP6.5 Watt5.5 Watt
45 nm45 nm, 0.8-1.175V
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA559FCBGA559
Featuresintegrated DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, Hyperthreadingintegrated DDR2 (667 MHz) memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, Hyperthreading, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$64 U.S.$64 U.S.
Announced
Transistors123 Million
Die Size66 mm2
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N450 +
min: 0.23     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.24 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N455 +
min: 509     avg: 547     median: 564 (3%)     max: 568 Points
min: 457     avg: 553     median: 560 (3%)     max: 589 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N455 +
min: 840     avg: 856     median: 863 (1%)     max: 866 Points
100%
N450 +
min: 741     avg: 861     median: 865 (1%)     max: 938 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N455 +
min: 3712     avg: 3751     median: 3750.5 (44%)     max: 3789 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N455 +
min: 118     avg: 119.5     median: 119.5 (24%)     max: 121 s
101%
N450 +
min: 115.8     avg: 120.7     median: 117 (24%)     max: 161.7 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N455 +
min: 445     avg: 476.7     median: 490 (1%)     max: 495 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N455 +
min: 92     avg: 94     median: 95 (21%)     max: 95 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N455 +
min: 202     avg: 213.7     median: 207 (9%)     max: 232 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N455 +
min: 4417     avg: 4523     median: 4533 (20%)     max: 4618 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
N455 +
min: 4196     avg: 4197     median: 4198 (2%)     max: 4198 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
N455 +
min: 3505     avg: 3506     median: 3506 (3%)     max: 3506 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
N455 +
min: 1261     avg: 1317     median: 1266 (3%)     max: 1423 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
N455 +
min: 2.3     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (29%)     max: 2.4 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N450 +
813 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N455 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N450 → 104% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 01:17:41

#0 checking url part for id 602 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 539 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.014s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 602 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#7 got single benchmarks 602 +0.048s ... 0.064s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 539 +0.003s ... 0.068s

#9 got single benchmarks 539 +0.104s ... 0.172s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.172s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.084s ... 0.256s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.283s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)