Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N455 vs Intel Atom N435 vs MediaTek MT8161

Intel Atom N455

► remove from comparison Intel N455

The Intel Atom N455 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR3 main memory (the difference to the Atom N450) and the GMA 3150 graphics card

The performance of the whole system (Atom N455 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is only marginally above a similar clocked Atom N280 / GMA 950.

An advantage of the combination, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 6.5 Watt TDP). Intel states 20% power reduction and 60% package reduction. Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops. Compared to the Z500 series combined with the US15W chipset (2.4+2.3 W), the power consumption is similar.

Intel Atom N435

► remove from comparison Intel N435

The Intel Atom N435 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2/DDR3 main memory and the GMA 3150 graphics card

The performance of the whole system (Atom N435 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance of the CPU is on a level with the slow Atom Z520.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 5 Watt TDP). Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks and thin laptops.

MediaTek MT8161

► remove from comparison

The MediaTek MT8161 is an ARM based entry-level to mid-range SoC for (Android based) tablets. It offers four ARM Cortex-A53 processor cores (quad-core) that are clocked with up to 1.3 GHz. Furthermore, an ARM Mali-720 graphics card, a LPDDR3 memory controller (e.g., accessing 1 GB in the Lenovo Tab 2 A8-50), Bluetooth 4.0 and dual-band 802.11 b/g/n are integrated in the SoC.

The performance is situated in the entry level of 2015 and often similar to the Kirin 910T (see benchmark below).

ModelIntel Atom N455Intel Atom N435MediaTek MT8161
SeriesIntel AtomIntel AtomMediatek
CodenamePinetrailPinetrailCortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
Intel Atom D5251.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N455 « 1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N4501.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N4351.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom D5251.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N4551.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N4501.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N435 « 1.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1660 MHz1333 MHz1300 MHz
FSB533533
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 21 / 24 / 4
TDP6.5 Watt5 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm28 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCBGA559FCBGA559
Featuresintegrated DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, Hyperthreadingintegrated DDR2/DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, HyperthreadingLP-DDR3 memory controller, 1080p video encode, 1080p video decode, embedded GPS / GLONASS / BeiDou module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM Jazelle, ARM TrustZone
Architecturex86x86ARM
$64 U.S.
Announced
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N455 +
min: 509     avg: 547     median: 564 (3%)     max: 568 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N455 +
min: 840     avg: 856     median: 863 (1%)     max: 866 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N455 +
min: 3712     avg: 3751     median: 3750.5 (44%)     max: 3789 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N455 +
min: 118     avg: 119.5     median: 119.5 (24%)     max: 121 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N455 +
min: 445     avg: 476.7     median: 490 (1%)     max: 495 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N455 +
min: 92     avg: 94     median: 95 (21%)     max: 95 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N455 +
min: 202     avg: 213.7     median: 207 (9%)     max: 232 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N455 +
min: 4417     avg: 4523     median: 4533 (20%)     max: 4618 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N455 +
min: 4196     avg: 4197     median: 4198 (2%)     max: 4198 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N455 +
min: 3505     avg: 3506     median: 3506 (3%)     max: 3506 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N455 +
min: 1261     avg: 1317     median: 1266 (3%)     max: 1423 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 N455 +
min: 2.3     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (29%)     max: 2.4 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MT8161 +
8693 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 MT8161 +
8398 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT8161 +
9598 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8161 +
1838 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8161 +
616 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8161 +
24610 ms (29%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8161 +
1713 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8161 +
1654 ms (16%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
2510 Points (2%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 MT8161 +
911 Points (24%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 MT8161 +
1398 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 MT8161 +
1866 Points (25%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
7512 points (17%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
26820 Points (27%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT8161 +
768 Iter./s (24%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT8161 +
7742 Iter./s (25%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8161 +
43768 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
3396 Points (17%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N455 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8161 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 01:43:21

#0 checking url part for id 602 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2692 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6882 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.058s ... 0.06s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.06s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 602 +0.003s ... 0.062s

#8 got single benchmarks 602 +0.049s ... 0.112s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 2692 +0.003s ... 0.114s

#10 got single benchmarks 2692 +0.006s ... 0.12s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 6882 +0.003s ... 0.123s

#12 got single benchmarks 6882 +0.013s ... 0.136s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.136s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.084s ... 0.22s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.22s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)