Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N435 vs MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz

Intel Atom N435

► remove from comparison Intel N435

The Intel Atom N435 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2/DDR3 main memory and the GMA 3150 graphics card

The performance of the whole system (Atom N435 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance of the CPU is on a level with the slow Atom Z520.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 5 Watt TDP). Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks and thin laptops.

MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz

► remove from comparison

The MediaTek MT8163 V/A is an ARM based entry-level to mid-range SoC for (Android based) tablets. It offers four ARM Cortex-A53 processor cores (quad-core) that are clocked with up to 1.5 GHz. Furthermore, an ARM Mali-T720 MP2 graphics card clocked at 600 MHz, a DDR3x32 1600Mbps memory controller, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11 b/g/n, GPS and FM are integrated in the SoC.

The similar named MediaTek MT8163 V/B is the slower clocked version, with a CPU clock o up to 1.3 GHz (-6%) and GPU of up to 520 MHz (-13%).

The performance is situated in the entry level of 2015 and often similar to the Kirin 910T (see benchmark below).

ModelIntel Atom N435MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz
SeriesIntel AtomMediatek
CodenamePinetrailCortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
Intel Atom D525 compare1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N455 compare1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N450 compare1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N435 « 1.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz « 1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1333 MHz1500 MHz
FSB533
L2 Cache512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 24 / 4
TDP5 Watt
Technology45 nm28 nm
SocketFCBGA559
Featuresintegrated DDR2/DDR3 memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, HyperthreadingDDR3x32 memory controller 1600Mbps, T720 MP2@520MHz, internal Display up to 1366x768, HMID up to 1080p, H.265 1080p video decode, 13MP image signal processor, WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n, embedded GPS module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM TrustZone
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2 (600 MHz)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8790     avg: 10063     median: 9926 (8%)     max: 11472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
776 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 768     avg: 831     median: 781 (9%)     max: 945 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
134 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
375 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 549     avg: 636     median: 636 (6%)     max: 723 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1553     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (2%)     max: 2009 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 12550     avg: 14061     median: 14060.5 (16%)     max: 15571 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2972     avg: 3261     median: 3261 (3%)     max: 3550 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 33452     avg: 37816     median: 37815.5 (13%)     max: 42179 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 4042     avg: 4277     median: 4276.5 (13%)     max: 4511 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 13724     avg: 15979     median: 15979 (20%)     max: 18234 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 2431     avg: 2672     median: 2671.5 (1%)     max: 2912 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 19354     avg: 21013     median: 21013 (13%)     max: 22672 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 39551     avg: 43893     median: 43892.5 (8%)     max: 48234 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2133 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
1923 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 3071     avg: 3328     median: 3424 (22%)     max: 3489 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
4576 Points (23%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 21:50:46

#0 checking url part for id 2692 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8109 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.057s ... 0.059s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.059s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2692 +0.003s ... 0.061s

#7 got single benchmarks 2692 +0.009s ... 0.07s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8109 +0.003s ... 0.073s

#9 got single benchmarks 8109 +0.017s ... 0.09s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.135s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.16s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)