Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium N4200 vs AMD A9-9420

Intel Pentium N4200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium N4200 is an Apollo Lake family, quad-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its four cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.5 GHz, with only 2.4 GHz available when all the cores are fully loaded; there is no Hyper-Threading here and thus no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 505, and eats very little (~6 W).

Curiously enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Pentium as of early 2023.

Architecture

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Pentium is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products such as the Raspberry Pi series.

The Pentium N4200 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture that came to replace Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations, making for a double-digit IPC improvement.

The Pentium is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Pentium is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N4200 in our database competes with the Core i5-3339Y, a power efficient chip launched in 2013, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, with the (much less ancient) Celeron 6305 lurking a little behind the two. In other words, the Pentium is a slow processor suitable for the most basic tasks only. As of 2021, it is light years behind the latest processors making use of high-performance architectures, such as the Zen 2-powered AMD Ryzen 3 5300U.

The Acer Aspire ES 17 ES1-732 is among the fastest laptops built around the N4200 that we know of. It can be around 50% faster than the slowest system featuring the same CPU in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 505 (18 EUs) is a rather good iGPU, considering this is a lower-end SoC released in 2016 we are talking about. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD 505 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors simultaneously at up to 2160p60. It will also happily decode VP9 and AVC, the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on as of 2021.

The UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz. Its actual clock speed will be much lower than that, since the small power budget has to be shared between the iGPU and the CPU cores. Expect most games to run terrible, even ones that were released in 2012 or 2010.

Power consumption

Just like most other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N4200 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the Power Limit 1), making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by just one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, improves the chip's performance by a huge margin, speaking subjectively.

This Pentium is built with a 14 nm Intel process making for poor energy efficiency (considering 14 nm processes are really old as of mid 2022).

AMD A9-9420

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9420

The AMD A9-9420 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. At its launch, the A9-9420 is the fastest Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and takes over that place from the A9-9410 (-100 MHz CPU clock). It integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 3 - 3.6 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders at 800 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to the high maximum clock of up to 3.6 GHz, the single-core performance should be pretty good. The multi-core performance on the other hand is much lower compared to the Bristol Ridge models. Compared to older Carrizo-L/Beema quad-cores, the APU should still perform pretty well. The level of performance should be similar to a Core-m3 and therefore also be sufficient for more demanding applications.

The TDP can be configured between 10-25 Watts, so there can be big performance differences under sustained workloads.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) GPU has 192 active shader units (3 compute cores) clocked at up to 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9420 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-25 Watts. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks, but also 15-inch devices with better cooling capabilities.

ModelIntel Pentium N4200AMD A9-9420
SeriesIntel PentiumAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameApollo LakeStoney Ridge
Clock1100 - 2500 MHz3000 - 3600 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP6 Watt10-25 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1296BGA
FeaturesDDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AESSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 505 (200 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$161 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 « 3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Transistors1200 Million
Die Size124.5 mm2

Benchmarks

min: 124     avg: 132     median: 134 (1%)     max: 138 Points
min: 75     avg: 80.3     median: 81 (24%)     max: 85 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.02     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (3%)     max: 2.27 Points
min: 1.56     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.65 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.64     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.66 Points
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (25%)     max: 1 Points
min: 2761     avg: 2868     median: 2875 (17%)     max: 2969 Points
min: 4627     avg: 4830     median: 4841 (4%)     max: 5022 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 7699     avg: 7766     median: 7766 (5%)     max: 7833 Points
6757 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2375     avg: 2392     median: 2392 (3%)     max: 2409 Points
3410 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 704     avg: 714     median: 714 (8%)     max: 724 s
min: 673     avg: 710     median: 710 (8%)     max: 747 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 20.13     avg: 22.6     median: 22.6 (5%)     max: 25.03 s
min: 20.78     avg: 21.3     median: 21.3 (4%)     max: 21.8 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
944 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.4 GB/s (4%)
1.1 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2636 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
31.4 s (7%)
min: 18     avg: 18.3     median: 18.3 (4%)     max: 18.6 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
68.4 s (3%)
min: 39.16     avg: 40.5     median: 40.5 (2%)     max: 41.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1453 s (6%)
min: 824     avg: 866     median: 866 (4%)     max: 908 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4306 Points (4%)
min: 1569     avg: 1659     median: 1632 (4%)     max: 1776 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 15955     avg: 18834     median: 18514.5 (15%)     max: 22351 Points
19241 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9441     avg: 16242     median: 17153 (14%)     max: 21222 Points
18148 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17050     avg: 22089     median: 22096 (19%)     max: 26889 Points
min: 18866     avg: 18895     median: 18894.5 (16%)     max: 18923 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1574     avg: 1754     median: 1727 (4%)     max: 2034 Points
min: 1375     avg: 1455     median: 1455 (4%)     max: 1535 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2330     avg: 2608     median: 2525 (5%)     max: 3054 Points
min: 2153     avg: 2155     median: 2155 (4%)     max: 2157 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 642     avg: 694     median: 668 (3%)     max: 771 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
345 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
935 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1544     avg: 1576     median: 1571.5 (16%)     max: 1616 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4468     avg: 4604     median: 4608.5 (5%)     max: 4729 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1526     avg: 1563     median: 1560.5 (21%)     max: 1609 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4162     avg: 4385     median: 4376.5 (11%)     max: 4558 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4425     avg: 4593     median: 4595 (8%)     max: 4736 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1362     avg: 1394     median: 1395.5 (27%)     max: 1430 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4867 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1498 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3199 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2447 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4201 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4784 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3954 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2966     avg: 3044     median: 3027 (4%)     max: 3142 ms
2120 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
232 ms (3%)
148.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8632     avg: 11881     median: 12856 (12%)     max: 13290 Points
min: 15762     avg: 17290     median: 17290 (16%)     max: 18818 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5998 Points (39%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium N4200 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9420 → 104% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 04:19:25

#0 checking url part for id 8180 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9184 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.04s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8180 +0.003s ... 0.043s

#7 got single benchmarks 8180 +0.08s ... 0.123s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9184 +0.003s ... 0.127s

#9 got single benchmarks 9184 +0.023s ... 0.149s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.149s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.301s ... 0.451s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 0.489s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)