, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron N3160 vs Intel Celeron N3000

Intel Celeron N3160

► remove from comparison Intel N3160

The Intel Celeron N3160 is a quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks, which has been announced in early 2016. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.24 GHz (Burst) and part of the Braswell platform. It is manufactured in a modern 14-nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. In addition to the four CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s). Compared to the predecessor Celeron N3150, the N3160 has a 160 MHz higher Burst clock.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations. The per-MHz performance is still much lower compared to the more expensive Core series (e. g. Broadwell).

Performance

With 4 CPU cores and a clock between 1.6-2.24 GHz, the technical specifications are similar to the previous Celeron N2930, so the processor performance is only slightly better. This means the processor is well-suited for everyday tasks (office, browsing) and even light multi-tasking should be no problem.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 640 MHz, however, the GPU performance is much lower. On average, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), so its a bit slower than the older HD Graphics 4000. Only older and simpler titles like Counter Strike: GO will run smoothly. The chip still includes an advanced video unit with support for 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can usually be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N3000

► remove from comparison Intel N3000

The Intel Celeron N3000 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.04 - 2.08 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock (IPC) has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Due to only two CPU cores, low clock rates and the weak IPC, the Celeron N3000 is not sufficient for demanding applications and may even struggle on complex websites. Overall, performance is similar to the old Celeron N2810.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 4 watts (SDP 3 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N3160Intel Celeron N3000
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
BraswellBraswell
Series: Celeron Braswell
» Intel Celeron N31601.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3060 compare1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N30001.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N31601.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3060 compare1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N30001.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2
1600 - 2240 MHz1040 - 2080 MHz
2 MB2 MB
4 / 42 / 2
6 4
14 14
90 °C90 °C
FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 640 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 640 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Intel Celeron N3160Intel Celeron N3000
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N3160 +
19687 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N3160 +
1696 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3160 +
1091 (14%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3160 +
3305 (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N3160 +
4300 ms (7%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N3160 +
991 ms (11%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N3160 +
8018 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 N3160 +
3380 Points (18%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 N3160 +
7992 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 N3160 +
5399 Points (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 N3160 +
7580 Points (38%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
100%
1 N3160 +
36 Points (88%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3160 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 21. 03:16:10

#0 checking url part for id 8167 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6782 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:08:09 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.012s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8167 +0s ... 0.012s

#7 got single benchmarks 8167 +0.008s ... 0.021s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6782 +0s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 6782 +0s ... 0.021s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.029s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.032s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)