Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Celeron N3050

Intel Celeron N3060

► remove from comparison Intel N3060

The Intel Celeron N3060 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.48 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor architecture Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). The N3060 is successor (refresh) to the Celeron N3050 and compared to it it offers a improved Turbo clock rate (2.48 vs 2.1 GHZ).

In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Depending on the cooling of the SoC, the Boost clock rate of 2.48 can be held for longer periods and therefore leading to a faster performance as the older Celeron N3050 that can only reach 2.16 GHz. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration. Although featuring a different name, the GPU was not changed from the N3050 (named HD Graphics alone).

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N3050

► remove from comparison Intel N3050

The Intel Celeron N3050 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to its predecessor Celeron N2815 (1.86 - 2.13 GHz), the N3050 offers an almost identical performance. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

ModelIntel Celeron N3060Intel Celeron N3050
CodenameBraswellBraswell
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Braswell
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 « 1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N30501.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N30601.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 « 1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1600 - 2480 MHz1600 - 2160 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 700 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 68     avg: 71.8     median: 72.5 (0%)     max: 74 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (11%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.41     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1216     avg: 1253     median: 1267 (8%)     max: 1275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2256     avg: 2352     median: 2397 (2%)     max: 2402 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3426 Points (2%)
min: 2935     avg: 2943     median: 2943 (2%)     max: 2951 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1800 Points (2%)
min: 1568     avg: 1573     median: 1572.5 (2%)     max: 1577 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1361 s (16%)
min: 1740     avg: 1757     median: 1757 (21%)     max: 1773 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
43.1 s (9%)
min: 52     avg: 54.4     median: 55.2 (11%)     max: 56.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 514     avg: 548     median: 529 (1%)     max: 619 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
5.5 fps (2%)
min: 4.7     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (2%)     max: 4.77 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
28.4 fps (7%)
min: 22.98     avg: 24.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 25.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (2%)
min: 0.04     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.059 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
min: 0.063     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0939 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.5 GB/s (1%)
min: 0.337     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.427 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 943     avg: 1150     median: 1243 (3%)     max: 1263 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27.5 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
61.2 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N3050 +
2247 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 918     avg: 995     median: 993 (3%)     max: 1076 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
10140 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
8087 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 10498     avg: 11007     median: 11006.5 (9%)     max: 11515 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 668     avg: 735     median: 735 (2%)     max: 802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1124 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1127 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1911 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1087 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1834 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1708 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
913 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 1594     avg: 1616     median: 1615.5 (3%)     max: 1637 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 895     avg: 905     median: 904.5 (14%)     max: 914 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N3050 +
2477 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N3050 +
2241 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N3050 +
2168 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N3050 +
2115 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N3050 +
2194 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4901     avg: 4929     median: 4928.5 (6%)     max: 4956 ms
min: 4926     avg: 5391     median: 5082.5 (6%)     max: 7633 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 366.5     avg: 785     median: 976 (11%)     max: 1013 ms
min: 378.8     avg: 407.1     median: 406.4 (4%)     max: 444.5 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7341     avg: 7793     median: 7735 (6%)     max: 8303 Points
min: 4059     avg: 6704     median: 7291 (6%)     max: 7545 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3060 → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3050 → 94% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 12. 06:20:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8067 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6781 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733980847s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Dec 2024 05:18:26 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8067 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 8067 +0.016s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6781 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 6781 +0.014s ... 0.037s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.067s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.069s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)