Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Celeron N3000

Intel Celeron N3060

► remove Intel N3060

The Intel Celeron N3060 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.48 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor architecture Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). The N3060 is successor (refresh) to the Celeron N3050 and compared to it it offers a improved Turbo clock rate (2.48 vs 2.1 GHZ).

In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Depending on the cooling of the SoC, the Boost clock rate of 2.48 can be held for longer periods and therefore leading to a faster performance as the older Celeron N3050 that can only reach 2.16 GHz. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration. Although featuring a different name, the GPU was not changed from the N3050 (named HD Graphics alone).

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N3000

► remove Intel N3000

The Intel Celeron N3000 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.04 - 2.08 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock (IPC) has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Due to only two CPU cores, low clock rates and the weak IPC, the Celeron N3000 is not sufficient for demanding applications and may even struggle on complex websites. Overall, performance is similar to the old Celeron N2810.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 4 watts (SDP 3 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N3060Intel Celeron N3000
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
BraswellBraswell
: Celeron Braswell
Intel Celeron N3160 (compare)1600 - 2240 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3150 (compare)1600 - 2080 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N30601600 - 2480 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3050 (compare)1600 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N30001040 - 2080 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3160 (compare)1600 - 2240 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3150 (compare)1600 - 2080 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N30601600 - 2480 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3050 (compare)1600 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N30001040 - 2080 MHz2 / 2
1600 - 2480 MHz1040 - 2080 MHz
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
6 4
14 14
90 °C90 °C
FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 700 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 600 MHz)
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron N3060Intel Celeron N3000

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 68     avg: 71.3     median: 71.5 (2%)     max: 74 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 36     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (18%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (3%)     max: 0.86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 0.41     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (18%)     max: 0.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 1216     avg: 1252.7     median: 1267 (14%)     max: 1275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 2256     avg: 2351.7     median: 2397 (5%)     max: 2402 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
3426 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
1800 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
1361.2 seconds (16%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
43.1 seconds (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
5.5 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
28.4 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.5 GB/s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27.5 Seconds (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
61.2 Seconds (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566.1 Seconds (7%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 918     avg: 995     median: 993 (5%)     max: 1076 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
10140 Points (7%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
8087 Points (10%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 10498     avg: 11006.5     median: 11006.5 (14%)     max: 11515 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 668     avg: 735     median: 735 (2%)     max: 802 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
1124 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
1708 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
913 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Compute OpenCL Score
6555 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
1834 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
1087 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.1/4.2 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
1127 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.1/4.2 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
1911 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 4901.1     avg: 4928.5     median: 4928.5 (8%)     max: 4955.9 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 366.5     avg: 785     median: 976 (11%)     max: 1012.6 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 7341     avg: 7793     median: 7735 (16%)     max: 8303 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3060 → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2018, 2017
v1.8
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)