Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3000 vs Intel Celeron N3150

Intel Celeron N3000

► remove from comparison Intel N3000

The Intel Celeron N3000 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.04 - 2.08 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock (IPC) has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Due to only two CPU cores, low clock rates and the weak IPC, the Celeron N3000 is not sufficient for demanding applications and may even struggle on complex websites. Overall, performance is similar to the old Celeron N2810.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 4 watts (SDP 3 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N3150

► remove from comparison Intel N3150

The Intel Celeron N3150 is a quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks, which has been presented in early 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.08 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2930). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Compared to its predecessor Celeron N2930 (1.8 - 2.2 GHz) or the competing AMD APU E2-6110, the N3150 offers an almost identical performance. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet browsing or office applications, but may struggle in more demanding software.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 640 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle demanding 3D games of 2015. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

ModelIntel Celeron N3000Intel Celeron N3150
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBraswellBraswell
Series: Celeron Braswell
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N31501.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3060 compare1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N30001.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N31501.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3060 compare1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N30001.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2
Clock1040 - 2080 MHz1600 - 2080 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP4 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 640 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 640 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N3000Intel Celeron N3150

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N3150 +
118 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N3150 +
32 Points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N3150 +
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N3150 +
0.4 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N3150 +
1085 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N3150 +
3624 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N3150 +
945 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N3150 +
30.1 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N3150 +
915 Points (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N3150 +
9 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N3150 +
44.8 fps (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N3150 +
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N3150 +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N3150 +
0.8 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N3150 +
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N3150 +
41 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N3150 +
90.2 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N3150 +
1939 s (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N3150 +
1516 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N3150 +
15395 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N3150 +
1311 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N3150 +
1925 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3150 +
2824 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3150 +
850 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N3150 +
2423 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N3150 +
2167 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N3150 +
3246 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N3150 +
3347 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N3150 +
2983 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N3150 +
7863 ms (9%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N3150 +
412.3 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N3150 +
3963 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3150 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 14. 02:31:22

#0 checking url part for id 6782 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6780 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.011s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 6782 +0s ... 0.011s

#15 got single benchmarks 6782 +0s ... 0.011s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 6780 +0s ... 0.012s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#19 got single benchmarks 6780 +0.009s ... 0.021s

#20 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.022s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.023s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#52 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.034s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.021s ... 0.055s

#54 return log +0.004s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)