Intel Celeron N3000 vs Intel Celeron N3150

Intel Celeron N3000

► remove Intel N3000

The Intel Celeron N3000 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.04 - 2.08 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock (IPC) has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Due to only two CPU cores, low clock rates and the weak IPC, the Celeron N3000 is not sufficient for demanding applications and may even struggle on complex websites. Overall, performance is similar to the old Celeron N2810.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 4 watts (SDP 3 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N3150

► remove Intel N3150

The Intel Celeron N3150 is a quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks, which has been presented in early 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.08 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2930). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Compared to its predecessor Celeron N2930 (1.8 - 2.2 GHz) or the competing AMD APU E2-6110, the N3150 offers an almost identical performance. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet browsing or office applications, but may struggle in more demanding software.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 640 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle demanding 3D games of 2015. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N3000Intel Celeron N3150
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
BraswellBraswell
: Celeron Braswell
Intel Celeron N3160 (compare)1600 - 2240 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N31501600 - 2080 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3060 (compare)1600 - 2480 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3050 (compare)1600 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N30001040 - 2080 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3160 (compare)1600 - 2240 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N31501600 - 2080 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3060 (compare)1600 - 2480 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3050 (compare)1600 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N30001040 - 2080 MHz2 / 2
1040 - 2080 MHz1600 - 2080 MHz
2 MB2 MB
2 / 24 / 4
4 6
14 14
90 °C90 °C
FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 640 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 640 MHz)
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron N3000Intel Celeron N3150

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
118 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
32 Points (15%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
1.5 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.4 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
1085 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
3624 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
945.1 seconds (11%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
30.1 seconds (6%)
WinRAR - Result
915 KB/s (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
9 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
44.8 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.8 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
41 Seconds (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
90.2 Seconds (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1939.2 Seconds (9%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
1516 points (8%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
15395 Points (10%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
1311 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
1925 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
2423 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
2167 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
3246 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
3347 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
2983 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
2824 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
850 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
7862.6 ms (13%)
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
412.3 ms (10%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
3963 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3150 → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2018, 2017
v1.8
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)