Intel Celeron N2930 vs Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Celeron N2810

Intel Celeron N2930

► remove Intel N2930

The Intel Celeron N2930 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.83 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2930 supports Quick Sync as well as Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2930 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2930 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact (and sometimes even passively cooled) subnotebooks and tablets.

Intel Celeron N2840

► remove Intel N2840

The Intel Celeron N2840 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.58 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2840 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2840 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Depending on the benchmark, the N2840 competes with older dual core CPUs like the Intel Core 2 Duo series. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 792 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2810

► remove Intel N2810

The Intel Celeron N2810 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2810 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to out benchmarks, the N2810 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2930Intel Celeron N2840Intel Celeron N2810
Intel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Bay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N29301830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051460 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N28402160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051460 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051460 MHz2 / 2
1830 - 2160 MHz2160 - 2580 MHz2000 MHz
224 KB112 KB112 KB
2 MB1 MB1 MB
4 / 42 / 22 / 2
7.5 7.5 7.5
22 22 22
105 °C105 °C
FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 854 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 792 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 792 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)
Intel Celeron N2930Intel Celeron N2840Intel Celeron N2810

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 123     avg: 129.4     median: 129 (3%)     max: 133 Points
min: 69     avg: 73.7     median: 76 (2%)     max: 76 Points
59 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 33     avg: 34.8     median: 35 (16%)     max: 36 Points
min: 37     avg: 38.7     median: 38 (17%)     max: 41 Points
31 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
1.5 Points (3%)
0.9 Points (2%)
0.7 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.4 Points (21%)
0.4 Points (22%)
0.4 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 1120     avg: 1131     median: 1131 (12%)     max: 1141 Points
min: 1328     avg: 1331     median: 1331 (14%)     max: 1334 Points
993 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 3687     avg: 3865     median: 3880 (6%)     max: 4013 Points
2533 Points (4%)
1474 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 5663     avg: 5708.5     median: 5708 (8%)     max: 5754 Points
min: 2585     avg: 3072.5     median: 3072 (4%)     max: 3560 Points
2672 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 1525     avg: 1566.5     median: 1566 (15%)     max: 1608 Points
min: 1471     avg: 1684     median: 1684 (16%)     max: 1897 Points
1318 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
852.4 seconds (10%)
1940.6 seconds (23%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
27.3 seconds (5%)
63.4 seconds (13%)
WinRAR - Result
1181 KB/s (14%)
680 KB/s (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
9.3 fps (0%)
4.3 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
47 fps (17%)
22.8 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (6%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (6%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (1%)
0.1 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
2214 Points (15%)
1510 Points (10%)
1043 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
38.7 Seconds (8%)
43 Seconds (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
84.7 Seconds (4%)
93.9 Seconds (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1813.6 Seconds (8%)
1999 Seconds (9%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
2038 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 1594     avg: 1666.2     median: 1679 (9%)     max: 1693 points
min: 860     avg: 1028     median: 1072 (6%)     max: 1107 points
858 points (4%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 4049     avg: 14857     median: 17776 (11%)     max: 18182 Points
min: 6624     avg: 6974.5     median: 6974 (4%)     max: 7325 Points
9157 Points (6%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
12854 Points (15%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 331     avg: 1258     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1532 Points
min: 644     avg: 651.5     median: 651 (2%)     max: 659 Points
710 Points (2%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
969 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
2493 Points (20%)
2192 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
2275 Points (21%)
2027 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
2992 Points (5%)
1715 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
3477 Points (6%)
1924 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
2968 Points (7%)
1898 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 2621     avg: 2686.4     median: 2703 (3%)     max: 2728 Points
1688 Points (2%)
1328 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 819     avg: 835.6     median: 839 (17%)     max: 842 Points
957 Points (20%)
762 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 4663     avg: 9866.5     median: 7469 (13%)     max: 19862 ms
min: 3842     avg: 4870     median: 4294 (7%)     max: 7094 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 378     avg: 827.5     median: 423 (5%)     max: 2303 ms
min: 306     avg: 493     median: 535 (6%)     max: 663 ms
Sunspider - 0.9.1 Total Score *
741.3 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 1238     avg: 4231.3     median: 4176 (8%)     max: 7334 Points
min: 4320     avg: 6695.4     median: 7486 (14%)     max: 8442 Points
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
41680 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
2046 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2930 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2840 → 83%

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2810 → 68%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)