Intel Celeron N2930 vs Intel Celeron N2815

Intel Celeron N2930

► remove from comparison Intel N2930

The Intel Celeron N2930 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.83 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2930 supports Quick Sync as well as Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2930 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2930 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact (and sometimes even passively cooled) subnotebooks and tablets.

Intel Celeron N2815

► remove from comparison Intel N2815

The Intel Celeron N2815 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.13 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2815 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2815 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2930Intel Celeron N2815
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Bay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
1830 - 2160 MHz1860 - 2133 MHz
224 KB112 KB
2 MB1 MB
4 / 42 / 2
7.5 7.5
22 22
105 °C105 °C
FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 854 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Intel Celeron N2930Intel Celeron N2815
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 123     avg: 129     median: 129 (3%)     max: 133 Points
min: 49     avg: 55.5     median: 55.5 (1%)     max: 62 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 33     avg: 34.8     median: 35 (13%)     max: 36 Points
min: 31     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (12%)     max: 34 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.39     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.59 Points
min: 0.62     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (13%)     max: 0.41 Points
min: 0.32     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (11%)     max: 0.4 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1120     avg: 1131     median: 1131.5 (10%)     max: 1141
1068 (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3687     avg: 3865     median: 3880 (7%)     max: 4013
2038 (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 5663     avg: 5709     median: 5708.5 (5%)     max: 5754 Points
2781 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1525     avg: 1567     median: 1566.5 (12%)     max: 1608 Points
1509 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
852 s (10%)
1818 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
27.3 s (5%)
57.8 s (12%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1181 (8%)
594 (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.3 fps (4%)
4.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
47 fps (14%)
24.1 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (5%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (5%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.2 GB/s (1%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2930 +
2214 Points (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
38.7 s (8%)
42.3 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
84.7 s (4%)
92.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1814 s (8%)
1965 s (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1594     avg: 1666     median: 1679 (7%)     max: 1693 Points
min: 850     avg: 872     median: 871.5 (4%)     max: 893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 4049     avg: 14857     median: 17776 (11%)     max: 18182 Points
min: 2209     avg: 5878     median: 5878 (4%)     max: 9547 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 331     avg: 1258     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1532 Points
min: 166     avg: 459     median: 459 (1%)     max: 752 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2815 +
1017 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2493 Points (20%)
2183 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2275 Points (21%)
1950 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2992 Points (6%)
1747 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3477 Points (7%)
1993 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2968 Points (8%)
1917 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2621     avg: 2686     median: 2703 (5%)     max: 2728
1343 (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 819     avg: 836     median: 839 (17%)     max: 842
781 (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 4663.9     avg: 9867     median: 7469.7 (13%)     max: 19862.8 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 378.6     avg: 828     median: 423.3 (5%)     max: 2303.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 1238     avg: 4231     median: 4176.5 (7%)     max: 7334 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 N2930 +
41680 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 N2930 +
2046 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2930 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2815 → 67% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)