Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2910 vs Intel Celeron N2830 vs Intel Celeron N2930

Intel Celeron N2910

► remove from comparison Intel N2910

The Intel Celeron N2910 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 1.6 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2910 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2910 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A6-1450. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2830

► remove from comparison Intel N2830

The Intel Celeron N2830 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2830 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2830 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2830 even competes with older dual core CPUs like the Core 2 Duo SU9400. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 750 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2930

► remove from comparison Intel N2930

The Intel Celeron N2930 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.83 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2930 supports Quick Sync as well as Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2930 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2930 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact (and sometimes even passively cooled) subnotebooks and tablets.

ModelIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2830Intel Celeron N2930
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz2160 - 2410 MHz1830 - 2160 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB112 KB224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 24 / 4
TDP7.5 Watt7.5 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2830Intel Celeron N2930
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 854 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Speedstep
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
27 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.1 Points (2%)
min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.87 Points
min: 1.39     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.59 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (1%)
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.45 Points
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.41 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
844 Points (7%)
min: 1088     avg: 1178     median: 1184.5 (10%)     max: 1241 Points
min: 1120     avg: 1131     median: 1131.5 (9%)     max: 1141 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2907 Points (3%)
min: 2145     avg: 2253     median: 2239.5 (3%)     max: 2356 Points
min: 3687     avg: 3865     median: 3880 (4%)     max: 4013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4302 Points (3%)
3340 Points (3%)
min: 5663     avg: 5709     median: 5708.5 (4%)     max: 5754 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1206 Points (7%)
1783 Points (10%)
min: 1525     avg: 1567     median: 1566.5 (9%)     max: 1608 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2930 +
852 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2930 +
27.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2930 +
1181 Points (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2930 +
9.3 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2930 +
47 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2930 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2930 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2930 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2910 +
1612 Points (3%)
137%
1 N2930 +
2214 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2910 +
27 s (6%)
97%
1 N2930 +
38.7 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2910 +
61 s (3%)
99%
1 N2930 +
84.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 s (7%)
99%
1 N2930 +
1814 s (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 970     avg: 1018     median: 1027 (3%)     max: 1052 Points
163%
1 N2930 +
min: 1594     avg: 1666     median: 1679 (5%)     max: 1693 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
13106 Points (8%)
min: 10142     avg: 10740     median: 10610 (7%)     max: 11180 Points
min: 4049     avg: 14857     median: 17776 (11%)     max: 18182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1107 Points (3%)
min: 812     avg: 846     median: 850 (2%)     max: 877 Points
min: 331     avg: 1258     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1532 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 1557     avg: 1569     median: 1565 (3%)     max: 1589 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 891     avg: 908     median: 909 (18%)     max: 928 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2910 +
2001 Points (16%)
125%
1 N2930 +
2493 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2910 +
1743 Points (16%)
131%
1 N2930 +
2275 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2910 +
2189 Points (4%)
137%
1 N2930 +
2992 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2910 +
2544 Points (5%)
137%
1 N2930 +
3477 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2910 +
2205 Points (6%)
135%
1 N2930 +
2968 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 4141     avg: 4944     median: 4482 (5%)     max: 6996 ms
96%
1 N2930 +
min: 4664     avg: 9867     median: 7469.5 (9%)     max: 19863 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 319     avg: 432.7     median: 375 (4%)     max: 592 ms
99%
1 N2930 +
min: 378.6     avg: 828     median: 423.3 (5%)     max: 2304 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 4542     avg: 6715     median: 7211 (7%)     max: 7397 Points
58%
1 N2930 +
min: 1238     avg: 4231     median: 4176.5 (4%)     max: 7334 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 N2930 +
41680 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 N2930 +
2046 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2910 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2830 → 103% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2930 → 134% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 30. 05:40:39

#0 checking url part for id 4576 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5684 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5686 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:15:11 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.015s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.015s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4576 +0s ... 0.015s

#11 got single benchmarks 4576 +0.007s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 5684 +0s ... 0.023s

#13 got single benchmarks 5684 +0.019s ... 0.042s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 5686 +0s ... 0.042s

#15 got single benchmarks 5686 +0.011s ... 0.054s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.056s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.058s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.063s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.069s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.07s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.073s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.076s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.079s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.079s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.08s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.081s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.082s

#37 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.087s

#38 return log +0s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)