Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2910 vs Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Celeron N2920

Intel Celeron N2910

► remove from comparison Intel N2910

The Intel Celeron N2910 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 1.6 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2910 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2910 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A6-1450. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2820

► remove from comparison Intel N2820

The Intel Celeron N2820 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2820 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2820 even competes with entry-level AMD APUs like the AMD E1-2500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2920

► remove from comparison Intel N2920

The Intel Celeron N2920 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2920 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. On average, the N2920 competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 844 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks and doesn't require extensive cooling systems.

ModelIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2920
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz2170 - 2390 MHz1860 - 2000 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB112 KB224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 24 / 4
TDP7.5 Watt7.5 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2920
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 756 MHz), Wireless Display, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 844 MHz), Dual-Channel DDR3L-1066 (max. 8 GB), Wireless Display
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N2820
8.9 pt (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N2820 +
347 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N2820 +
173 Points (8%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
79 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N2820 +
143 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)
min: 46     avg: 58     median: 58 (1%)     max: 70 Points
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
min: 116     avg: 118.5     median: 118.5 (1%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
27 Points (8%)
min: 26     avg: 34.3     median: 37.9 (12%)     max: 39 Points
min: 32     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (10%)     max: 33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.1 Points (2%)
min: 0.51     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.87 Points
min: 1.38     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (1%)
min: 0.29     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.43 Points
min: 0.37     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.38 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
844 Points (7%)
min: 900     avg: 1061     median: 1061 (9%)     max: 1222 Points
min: 1011     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (8%)     max: 1049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2907 Points (3%)
min: 1635     avg: 2010     median: 2010 (2%)     max: 2385 Points
min: 3434     avg: 3530     median: 3530 (4%)     max: 3626 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4302 Points (3%)
3243 Points (2%)
min: 4945     avg: 5095     median: 5094.5 (4%)     max: 5244 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1206 Points (7%)
1672 Points (9%)
1453 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2820 +
1543 s (18%)
108%
1 N2920 +
962 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2820 +
48.5 s (10%)
104%
1 N2920 +
32 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2820 +
675 Points (4%)
256%
1 N2920 +
1728 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N2820 +
2891 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N2820 +
1643 MIPS (20%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2820 +
5.8 fps (2%)
144%
1 N2920 +
8.4 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2820 +
26.5 fps (6%)
159%
1 N2920 +
42.1 fps (10%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N2820 +
0.4 fps (1%)
000.10.10.20.20.20.30.30.40.40.40.50.50.60.60.60.70.70.8Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2820 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
159%
1 N2920 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2820 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
164%
1 N2920 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2820 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
163%
1 N2920 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N2820 +
9415 Seconds (66%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N2820 +
3.1 sec (67%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1612 Points (3%)
1418 Points (3%)
min: 1821     avg: 1861     median: 1860.5 (4%)     max: 1900 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27 s (6%)
36.5 s (8%)
43.7 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
61 s (3%)
81.4 s (3%)
95 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
1696 s (8%)
2035 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N2920 +
22880 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N2920 +
12360 MFLOPS (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N2920 +
3606 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
967 Points (3%)
164%
1 N2920 +
min: 1485     avg: 1582     median: 1582 (4%)     max: 1679 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
13106 Points (8%)
5790 Points (4%)
15979 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
10079 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N2820 +
12137 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1107 Points (3%)
min: 196     avg: 521     median: 520.5 (1%)     max: 845 Points
1355 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 Points (3%)
125%
1 N2920 +
1952 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
221 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
405 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
215 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
393 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (11%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 1761     avg: 1763     median: 1762.5 (2%)     max: 1764 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
1553 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
879 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
1677 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2820 +
950 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2910 +
2001 Points (16%)
120%
1 N2820 +
2406 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2910 +
1743 Points (16%)
119%
1 N2820 +
2077 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2910 +
2189 Points (4%)
92%
1 N2820 +
2008 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2910 +
2544 Points (5%)
91%
1 N2820 +
2304 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2910 +
2205 Points (6%)
98%
1 N2820 +
2165 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2820 +
4659 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2820 +
min: 372.9     avg: 522     median: 522 (6%)     max: 671 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N2820 +
29.1 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N2820 +
41.1 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2910 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2820 → 90% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2920 → 116% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 27. 06:39:46

#0 checking url part for id 4576 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4991 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4993 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.013s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.018s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.018s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4576 +0s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 4576 +0.008s ... 0.026s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 4991 +0.005s ... 0.031s

#13 got single benchmarks 4991 +0.013s ... 0.044s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 4993 +0.001s ... 0.045s

#15 got single benchmarks 4993 +0.01s ... 0.054s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.063s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.066s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.067s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.07s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.072s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.076s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.077s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.013s ... 0.09s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.091s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.092s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.093s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.093s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.095s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.096s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.098s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.098s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.101s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.102s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.103s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.103s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.104s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.105s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.107s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.107s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.108s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.109s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.11s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.11s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.112s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.113s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.113s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.113s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.114s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.115s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.115s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.116s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.116s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.116s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.117s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.118s

#93 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.118s

#94 return log +0s ... 0.119s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)