Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2910 vs Intel Celeron N2807 vs Intel Celeron N2940

Intel Celeron N2910

► remove from comparison Intel N2910

The Intel Celeron N2910 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 1.6 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2910 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2910 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A6-1450. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2807

► remove from comparison Intel N2807

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.2 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2807 is clearly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2807 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed (313 - 750 MHz), the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (3 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2940

► remove from comparison Intel N2940

The Intel Celeron N2940 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.83 - 2.25 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2940 supports Quick Sync as well as Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2940 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2940 is similar to or slightly faster than the AMD Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts (4.5 W SDP - Scenario Design Power). Thus, the chip can be used in compact (and sometimes even passively cooled) subnotebooks and tablets.

ModelIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2940
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz1580 - 2160 MHz1830 - 2250 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB112 KB224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 24 / 4
TDP7.5 Watt4.3 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2940
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 854 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Speedstep
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)
65 Points (1%)
min: 89     avg: 110.5     median: 110.5 (1%)     max: 132 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
27 Points (8%)
35 Points (11%)
min: 35     avg: 35.5     median: 35.5 (11%)     max: 36 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.1 Points (2%)
0.5 Points (1%)
min: 1.57     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (1%)
0.3 Points (1%)
0.4 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
844 Points (7%)
986 Points (8%)
1150 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2907 Points (3%)
2093 Points (2%)
3958 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4302 Points (3%)
3047 Points (2%)
5784 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1206 Points (7%)
1584 Points (9%)
1663 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2807 +
1763 s (21%)
113%
1 N2940 +
867 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2807 +
57.4 s (12%)
106%
1 N2940 +
29.2 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2807 +
408 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2807 +
3.2 fps (1%)
297%
1 N2940 +
9.4 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2807 +
17 fps (4%)
276%
1 N2940 +
46.9 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2807 +
0 GB/s (0%)
340%
1 N2940 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2807 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
328%
1 N2940 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2807 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
337%
1 N2940 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2910 +
1612 Points (3%)
136%
1 N2940 +
2191 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27 s (6%)
38.8 s (8%)
27.5 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
61 s (3%)
84.7 s (4%)
61.2 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
1806 s (8%)
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2807 +
976 Points (3%)
168%
1 N2940 +
1635 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
13106 Points (8%)
6368 Points (4%)
17767 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1107 Points (3%)
548 Points (1%)
1257 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2807 +
1089 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2807 +
688 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2910 +
2001 Points (16%)
112%
1 N2807 +
2249 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2910 +
1743 Points (16%)
113%
1 N2807 +
1974 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2910 +
2189 Points (4%)
64%
1 N2807 +
1391 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2910 +
2544 Points (5%)
62%
1 N2807 +
1576 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2910 +
2205 Points (6%)
75%
1 N2807 +
1658 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2910 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2807 → 86% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2940 → 125% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.22
log 07. 04:27:22

#0 checking url part for id 4576 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5682 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6009 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 04 Dec 2022 10:20:04 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4576 +0.002s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 4576 +0.006s ... 0.04s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5682 +0.002s ... 0.041s

#10 got single benchmarks 5682 +0.006s ... 0.047s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 6009 +0.001s ... 0.048s

#12 got single benchmarks 6009 +0.009s ... 0.057s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.151s ... 0.208s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.208s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)