Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2910 vs Intel Celeron N2807 vs Intel Celeron N2840

Intel Celeron N2910

► remove from comparison Intel N2910

The Intel Celeron N2910 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 1.6 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2910 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2910 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A6-1450. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2807

► remove from comparison Intel N2807

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.2 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2807 is clearly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2807 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed (313 - 750 MHz), the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (3 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2840

► remove from comparison Intel N2840

The Intel Celeron N2840 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.58 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2840 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2840 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Depending on the benchmark, the N2840 competes with older dual core CPUs like the Intel Core 2 Duo series. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 792 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2840
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz1580 - 2160 MHz2160 - 2580 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB112 KB112 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 22 / 2
TDP7.5 Watt4.3 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 792 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2840
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 792 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, Speedstep
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)
65 Points (1%)
min: 69     avg: 73.7     median: 76 (1%)     max: 76 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
27 Points (8%)
35 Points (11%)
min: 37     avg: 38.7     median: 38 (12%)     max: 41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.1 Points (2%)
0.5 Points (1%)
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (1%)     max: 0.92 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (1%)
0.3 Points (1%)
min: 0.43     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
844 Points (7%)
986 Points (8%)
min: 1328     avg: 1331     median: 1331 (11%)     max: 1334 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2907 Points (3%)
2093 Points (2%)
2533 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4302 Points (3%)
3047 Points (2%)
min: 2585     avg: 3073     median: 3072.5 (2%)     max: 3560 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1206 Points (7%)
1584 Points (9%)
min: 1471     avg: 1684     median: 1684 (9%)     max: 1897 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2807 +
1763 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2807 +
57.4 s (12%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2807 +
408 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2807 +
3.2 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2807 +
17 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2807 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2807 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2807 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2910 +
1612 Points (3%)
94%
1 N2840 +
1510 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2910 +
27 s (6%)
97%
1 N2807 +
38.8 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2910 +
61 s (3%)
99%
1 N2807 +
84.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 s (7%)
99%
1 N2807 +
1806 s (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2807 +
976 Points (3%)
110%
1 N2840 +
min: 860     avg: 1028     median: 1072.5 (3%)     max: 1107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
13106 Points (8%)
6368 Points (4%)
min: 6624     avg: 6975     median: 6974.5 (4%)     max: 7325 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N2840 +
12854 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1107 Points (3%)
548 Points (1%)
min: 644     avg: 652     median: 651.5 (2%)     max: 659 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2807 +
1089 Points (2%)
155%
1 N2840 +
1688 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2807 +
688 Points (13%)
139%
1 N2840 +
957 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2910 +
2001 Points (16%)
112%
1 N2807 +
2249 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2910 +
1743 Points (16%)
113%
1 N2807 +
1974 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2910 +
2189 Points (4%)
64%
1 N2807 +
1391 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2910 +
2544 Points (5%)
62%
1 N2807 +
1576 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2910 +
2205 Points (6%)
75%
1 N2807 +
1658 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 3843     avg: 4870     median: 4295 (5%)     max: 7094 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 306.9     avg: 493     median: 535 (6%)     max: 664 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2840 +
741 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N2840 +
min: 4320     avg: 6695     median: 7486 (8%)     max: 8442 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2910 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2807 → 82% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2840 → 101% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 28. 09:43:46

#0 checking url part for id 4576 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5682 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6008 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.015s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.015s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4576 +0s ... 0.015s

#11 got single benchmarks 4576 +0.007s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 5682 +0s ... 0.022s

#13 got single benchmarks 5682 +0.006s ... 0.028s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 6008 +0s ... 0.029s

#15 got single benchmarks 6008 +0.024s ... 0.053s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.055s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.056s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.058s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.066s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.07s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.072s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#66 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.078s

#67 return log +0s ... 0.078s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)